Fox News’s Bret Baier is scheduled to host a televised forum for the three candidates for Speaker of the House — an unusual move that follows Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s (R-Calif.) unprecedented ouster as Speaker.

House Majority Leader Scalise (R-La.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Republican Study Committee Chairman Kevin Hern (R-Okla.) would participate in the event on Monday at 6 p.m. EST.

The three men will all appear on the same stage together, according to two sources familiar with the plans, a format that Fox News is billing as a “joint interview” rather than a “debate.”

The network said Baier will “press the congressmen on who should be the next Speaker of the House and discuss the issues facing Congress and the Republican party going forward.”

31 points
*

Wow, they are really dead set on making this whole process a hyper-embarrassing circus of dysfunction, huh?

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

I feel like that is kind of the whole point behind this thing. They get to completely shut down the government while they play up all the internal strife as if it’s not manufactured to keep the government from performing it’s job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think it’s manufactured. They want Biden to eat the blame for the shutdown and economic damage they’re about to cause. It gets harder and harder to do that when they’re clearly the problem.

It’s possible they’re betting that optics won’t matter and that the president always eats the blame for the economy. But this is testing that theory as hard as humanly possible. Seems counterproductive to make more of a show of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
16 points

If they’re going to do this, they should include Hakeem Jeffries, as well. Yes, Jeffries is a Democrat, and the current Minority Leader of the House, but he has the votes of all Democrats, which means he likely has more support now than any of the Republican candidates.

Just like the Republican candidates have to convince a handful of Ultra MAGA representatives, Jeffries only has to convince a handful of more moderate Republicans.

Although, especially with Jim Jordan in the mix, it’s possible that the three candidates might ruin the GOP on their own.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Lol so uh, this is intended to be an internal process that the House just takes care of. I fail to see what the point of a “debate” would be in this context.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

You can’t fundraise and commit stochastic terrorism off an internal process!

Like do you even republican, man?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

but why?

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments