This is the best summary I could come up with:
A Kenyan court temporarily blocked the government from deploying hundreds of police personnel in Haiti in a UN-approved mission aimed at helping the Caribbean nation tackle rampant gang violence.
The court order issued on Monday is valid until 24 October and followed a petition jointly filed by one of the opposition political parties and two Kenyans who say the decision to deploy the police officers outside the east African country is illegal.
According to a court document seen by Reuters, the order bars Kenyan government officials including the president and his interior minister “from deploying police officers to Haiti or any other country until 24th October 2023”.
In July, Kenya pledged to offer 1,000 police officers after Haiti appealed for international help with security personnel to assist in its battle against gangs blamed for spiraling violence.
The United Nations estimates some 200,000 Haitians have been displaced during escalating violence, with armed gangs carrying out indiscriminate killings, kidnappings, gang rapes and torching people’s homes.
According to the petitioners, the deployment of the police officers is “not only nonsensical and irrational but unconstitutional”.
The original article contains 209 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 13%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Huh? Just for clarity’s sake, is this a good or bad thing?
Depends on how you see it. Last time U.N. peacekeepers were in Haiti it was a complete disaster. They were caught running child sex trafficking rings.
It was in fact, so prolific there is an entire wiki dedicated to it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse_by_UN_peacekeepers
On the other hand, without some sort of outside intervention or help the status quo in Haiti will remain. I don’t really think any of it is " good " so to speak but I struggle to imagine another U.N. mission will bring about fruitful results for anyone involved.
I’m not going to deny the shitshow it was last time the UN sent troops to Haiti but here’s me naively hoping that this kind of mess doesn’t repeat.
On thing I read these days it’s a good thing they’re sending police officers (who are generally charged to return things to order and peace) and not soldiers (who, generally, are tasked to destroy an enemy).
Granted that’s a broad generalisation since I don’t believe UN peacekeeping troops are sent to places with the explicit orders to destroy something but I think there is a difference in the general mindset and training between police an military.
So maybe, maybe this will do some good? If Kenya is allowed to send police officers.
If you read the wiki it details that police and soldiers took part in the abuse alike. Of course this doesn’t happen with every U.N. deployment, but the bad blood and amnesty towards peacekeepers will not be easily forgotten by the locals.
The courts are probably saving everyone some trouble here.
Love to see it when the bourgeois liberal structures are used against bourgeois liberal interests. Hopefully the courts can keep this whole thing from happening. We need to starve the West of all reserves and that means they can’t delegate their imperialism to any more puppets than they already have.
The USA, who trained the Colombian team and directed them in their assassination of Moise; the UK who colonized Kenya; France who colonized Haiti; and of course, despite the multi-national agreement for its creation, the UN, which was based on the previous European-contrived League of Nations, and today has been used primarily as a tool by the West to launder and justify its hegemony.
