85 points

Hot take here, judging by the company, but I think Biden’s doing great. He’s moved the federal government in a more progressive direction than any presidential administration since Lyndon Johnson, and I’m confident with more Democrats in the legislature he could do even more.

Simultaneously, the opposition has become so dangerous that it’s absolutely critical the Democratic coalition remain together. There are always going to be criticisms you can level against any leader. I certainly don’t agree with Biden 100% of the time. But if you check out the other hot takes here, making Biden out to be the devil, or saying they’ll never vote for him…those people are trying to elect Donald Trump again.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

Biden is definitely doing much better than I expected. No question. Nowhere near the Bernie Sanders type that we need, but a pleasant surprise.

In another time, I probably would go on a rant about Boomer politics killing us slowly. But since Republicans have literally become fascist lunatics, Democrats have to stick together no matter what.

History has shown us just how bad things can get under fascism, and these Republicans are dangerous, stupid, and cruel, and stupid. And yes, I know I put stupid twice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

In another time, I probably would go on a rant about Boomer politics killing us slowly. But since Republicans have literally become fascist lunatics, Democrats have to stick together no matter what.

God, isn’t that the truth. If you told me in 2012 that Mitt fucking Romney, theocrat and corpo cocksucker extraordinaire, was going to be one of the least fascist members of the GOP in 10 years, I would have laughed in your face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Or that we’d be happy with Liz Cheney?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m just impressed he didn’t crack down on the left first thing.

Not snark here, I had worried he would.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I have no problem with democrats ‘sticking together’ as far as voting blue next election, but don’t sit back after you’ve done that.

The seeds for fascism in the USA are the same ones that were in Germany when Hitler rose - rampant inequality and poverty leading to desperate people leading to christian nationalism, and later fascism. I hate to break it to you but a Democratic party with no one to the left of them has no incentive to fix the root problems, and every incentive to stay on the take and then escape to their favorite country with their wealth if they push it too far.

Campaign finance reform, election reform, labor reform … pick a cause and find some friends. We cannot have a democracy without working for it. Fascism will rise in the absence of effort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What we need is a left-wing candidate to win a primary, and pull the party to the left the way Bush and Trump pulled their party to the alt-right

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

It’s the #walkaway all over again, which really was conservatives saying that they won’t vote for democrats “again”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I don’t know if I’d say great, but he was considerably less disappointing than I’d feared.

Ultimately, we need an overhaul rather than incremental change - but bet your ass I’m voting Dem for every Federal office come 2024, Biden included. The overhaul the fascists promise, after all, is not one that can be reversed.

permalink
report
parent
reply

but bet your ass I’m voting Dem for every Federal office come 2024, Biden included.

And just a reminder, why don’t we all get warmed up voting in our local elections in 2023.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I have to admit, I was definitively in the “they’re really gonna make me vote for Joe Biden?” Camp, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised. His work with the railroad union really solidified it, where sure, don’t love the strike breaking, but the post-strike negotiations end results was certainly a win for those same rail workers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*

Man I’m so fully employed that I have three part time jobs. All of which I need to pay rent. Pretty sweet!

No I do not have health insurance.

permalink
report
reply
-11 points

Oof life is a grind but if you can surround yourself with the right relationships/community and keep putting your best foot forward things will get better on the job front.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Yeah I’ve worked my way into a profession where if you’re not the lucky 1/500 that gets the full time, tenure track job, you’ve just got to work at 2-3 different universities part time, with no insurance. There are worse choices I could have made, but academia was not a good one. At this point I will never have a full time job unless I change professions; once you’ve adjuncted long enough you’re essentially toxic to any hiring committee. And as far as I can tell, I unlike other industries, personal and university connections are actively detrimental; it reflects poorly on a department to hire people who’ve got a connection to the department.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s really sad. My father entered into academia in 1960, got tenure in a reasonable amount of time and, by the time he retired, was making a really good salary, able to afford things like taking us on a two-week vacation to Italy. I have a friend whose husband is in academia and suffering similar problems from you. What the hell changed and why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Why are you working part time jobs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I can’t get full time jobs. I’ve only ever had one and got laid off. Theyre also harder to get because your employer has to pay for health insurance if you work more than 28 hours per week.

I’m also a weird case cause I’m an adjunct professor. Precarity comes with the territory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Why not quit being a professor and use your doctorarte degree to get a salaried position?

You will absolutely make more money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Full time jobs hardly ever work with a part time job. Finding times to fit usually means two part time jobs than a full time and part time. Plus businesses get jealous when you don’t dedicate your life to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The goal should be zero employment. Making people work to justify their existence is the antithesis of what we’ve fought and suffered for a hundred thousand years to achieve.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

The goal should be zero employment.

Hunting and gathering is still working to justify your existence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

With the pretty huge difference that when they got enough for everyone, they stopped and lived life.

We on the other hand, sit there and try to find ways to complete our work day despite having completed our goals, we even work more than what the world needs, driving up profits for our masters and throwing away what isn’t used. And yet we still can’t feed everyone despite producing more than enough, because it would be less profitable to spread those resources equally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Lol this is just unhinged man. You’re really arguing to go back to hunter-gathering. I thought you were kidding lol

Not even worth an argument. No one is going back to that en masse.

Move to Alaska. Hunt and gather all you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes and we should be doing less work than they did, not more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Your life is massively easier, safer, healthier, and more convenient than theirs. Your life expectancy is massively higher. The trade off there is an interconnected and interdependent series of jobs.

You are welcome to go be a subsistence farmer or scavenging hermit at any point if youd prefer, but expecting all the same benefits without contribution is a bit odd.

There is a reason people choose even sweatshop labor over subsistence farming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

“Full employment” is a lie…

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Maybe they used speech recognition. They meant fool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s not helping me or anyone I know, so…

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 481K

    Comments