8 points

Yes, provided the chase didn’t stop a cat should easily do it.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I dunno. Build one and try it with your cat and let us know the results.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Cat expert here. Yes a cat could.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

At least 3 of my cats could do that, even at low speeds.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

The cat is moving in a circle, so it has a centripetal acceleration and a centripetal force. At the apex of the loop, that force is the sum of gravity, and resistance from the track. The track force is greater than or equal to zero, so acceleration due to gravity is less than or equal to the total centripetal acceleration.

g ≤ v²/r
So,
r ≤ v²/g

Taking top speed of a cat as 8.278m/s (from Wolfram Alpha), and g on earth as 9.81m/s², this gives us r ≤ 6.99m. So long as the cat can maintain its top speed all around the loop, it can successfully do a loop of up to 14 meters diameter. This is a lot bigger than I expected, to the extent that I suspect some flaw in my reasoning.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

The cat won’t be able to maintain its top speed because of deceleration from lack of friction

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Claws homie

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

True. But if top speed allows for 14 meters, surely a 1.5 to 2 m loop should be possible (especially given a cat’s incredible reflexes and control given a lack of friction or even freefall). I’d guess that a cat, given enough motivation, could keep running under the little friction provided by the centripetal force for a few hundred milliseconds - likely long enough to complete a 1m loop, maybe even 2, given sufficient space for a top-speed run before entering…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Good point. It has zero contact force at the apex, so 14m is an upper bound on possible cat-loops.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I get the same math… Seems fucky but… This is assuming the sum of centripetal acceleration and gravity at the peak of the loop is zero. It may be physically possible for a cat to learn to manage a loop with such velocity but I imagine a cat wouldn’t be able to maintain a stride through a zero-g portion of the loop the first time it tried it.

So, instead let’s throw an assumption that the cat must maintain at minimum sum of -1g at the maxima of the loop. That may be badly phrased, assuming the cat must have at minimum a net force of at least one g between it’s paws and the surface of the loop it was currently using to accelerate…

3.5 meters = 11.5 feet

Radius, so still a freaking 7 meter diameter loop feels incredible…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 7.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 289K

    Comments