18 points

Comes with a free space heater too. Neat.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Remember when CPU’s / GPU’s had clockspeeds that didn’t include “up to”

I understand why it’s better net performance doing it this way and better uses the whole potential performance of the chip.

That still doesn’t make me like it, not because of the technical reasons, but because of the way they twist the marketing, it could hit 6ghz for 1 microsecond and they could still claim #nowupto6ghz!

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Tell me the base clock, not the “up to… when powered by a fusion reactor” value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I remember 20 years ago already seeing 3ghz CPUs, isn’t technology supposed to improve fast?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

We’re running into hard physical limits now, the transistors in each chip are so small that any smaller and they’d start running into quantumn effects that would render them unreliable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Clock speed isn’t improving that quickly anymore. Other aspects, such as more optimized power consumption, memory speeds, cache sized, less cycle-demanding operations, more cores have been improving faster instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

And it has. The phone you have is faster than the 3GHz chip back then. A phone powered by a battery. And faster by like 20 times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

My dad had one of the first consumer 3GHz chips available. By the time I inherited it in 2009 it was completely outclassed by a <2GHz dual-core laptop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I remember when chips first hit 1GHz around 1999. Tech magazines were claiming that we’d hit 7GHz in 5 years.

What they failed to predict is that you start running into major heat issues if you try to go past ~3GHz. Which is why CPU manufacturers started focusing on other ways to improve performance, such as multiple cores and better memory management.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The ultimate fix remains unexplored: reversible computing uses 0-1 pairs. Basically you do logic on the left one and swap them to invert that logical bit. Because the charge is simply transmitted, instead of grounded away or powered up, negligible entropy is involved.

I suspect you’d have to sink the values eventually… but I expect you could send them off “behind the woodshed” for that. Do all the work in some tiny flake of silicon, then transmit a stream of noise to a big dumb block of metal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Just use the heat to power the machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah, that’s how it works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

That would’ve been a single 3ghz cpu core. Now we have dozens in one chip. Also, the instruction sets and microcode has gotten way better since then as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I thought Intel was dropping the K9 branding and skipping desktop chips for 14th Gen…

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Winter is coming. Time to buy a space heater

permalink
report
reply
-7 points

or an amd rig

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For when you want to sleep in sub zero temps!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 554K

    Comments