X (Twitter) to soon begin charging $1 annual subscription in order to tweet and interact.

Next move must be to charge users deleting their accounts $1. And Elon can sell your data to make more money.

108 points

Sounds more like a way to ID everyone on the platform. And perhaps normalize this practice for other platforms going forward.

permalink
report
reply
70 points

Quick access to massive credit card info as well. Micro step to “the everything app”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Yeah this is a high possibility.

People might think he’s just a bad businessman, but I think they’re overlooking the fact that he’s an evil businessman relentlessly pursuing his dreams of dictatorship based off of actual dictatorships… that is also very bad at business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Somehow I doubt this credit card info will stay un-hacked for very long…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

TIL my identity is worth $1 a year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

No, your identity is worth negative $1. You’re paying to give it away. He didn’t offer $1 to get it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points

I’m gonna call it. This is an (obvious) attempt to squeak in monetization for everyone on twitter that is as unobjectionable as possible, and once everyone’s locked in the price will increase, and tiers will be introduced, etc etc., and it’s going to work. Nobody still on twitter is gonna care about $1/year to keep access. They’ll lap it up and thank Musk for the opportunity to be fleeced.

Musk could still fuck it up by being overly greedy and ramping up too much too fast like he tried to do last year (or this year? I’ve lost track), but I’d say this has reasonable odds of working out.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Elon simps are already going “lol $1 i literally paid more than that for my coffee”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

and then the capitalism admirers: “I don’t have problem to pay for a good service. What do you people think? Isn’t it costly to run a good service?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah except that the spammers already have blue checkmarks. They’re already paying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

for everyone on twitter that is as unobjectionable as possible, and once everyone’s locked in the price will increase, and tiers will be introduced, etc etc., and it’s going to work.

I’m not so sure about that. The internet is littered with companies that gave away their product for free hoping users would pay for premium features. When they didn’t and the companies then had to charge a minimum entry fee for everyone, people dropped the product. There’s a barrier to putting in your credit card. Lots of people just aren’t interested.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There are also a whole lot of governmental, health and official bodies where putting through an invoice is a real pain in the bum. It forces a decision whereas previously if had been a simple business as usual process

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re definitely right about that being the general result to these sorts of moves, but I don’t think it’ll apply as harshly to this situation. Like I said, anyone still on the site has already faced numerous insults and abuse at the hands of Musk. They want to be there despite all of that, or maybe even because of it. I do think a $1/month or something higher would be pretty likely to fail, but $1/year is such a low-level ask and will gently push the users there past the barrier to where the price can be raised higher later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

$1/year is such a low-level ask and will gently push the users there past the barrier to where the price can be raised higher later.

The amount being asked isn’t the barrier I’m referring to. Twitter could be charging one penny, and they’d still lose this particular group. Consumers have been burned by entering a credit card for a low or free trial only later to discover sudden fees they couldn’t get refunded. The only protection is to not give your credit card.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Not really. I was working with the communications department of a large local authority in London recently. They use Twitter/X as a broadcast medium for public snnouncements via Hootsuite. I don’t think they had noticed any disruption at all. Similarly with Public Health and the NHS

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Musk wants Twitter to become a ‘platform for everything’. Having a payment system in place everyone uses already is key for that.

Not going to say that this is a good idea, but thats the rational.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think he’s expecting a tax break from twitter

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

We should probably stop devoting news cycles to this manchild and his vanity pet projects.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Honestly I want this covered. Elon is a toddler who’s never been told “no” and he can’t stand not having all the attention on him. As long as he’s throwing his toys and sticking his fingers into light sockets, burning every bridge he’s ever built bought to keep himself in the headlines, I don’t mind spurring him on. Let everyone see how smart he is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

I’m gonna continue my run of not giving Elon Musk a fucking cent.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Unfortunately, if you’re a U.S. taxpayer, you’ve given him a lot of your cents whether you want to or not in the form of subsidies for Tesla and SpaceX.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Some of my cents. I wouldn’t say a lot of my cents.

I’m doing mediocre financially but it’s not that bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Are we sure this man understands business?

permalink
report
reply
43 points

He purposefully is destroying it to prevent the poor from organizing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

We can just organize on open platforms like mastodon instead!

Yeah we’re fucked lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You are overselling Twitter if you think Twitter can do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I mean, idk how it is after the musk take over but twitter used to be a legitimate tool for political organizing. Iirc they used it a lot during the Hong Kong protests and it was a driving factor during the Arab spring. Free communication for the masses helps in these situations, especially in an otherwise state controlled media environment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

twitter is/was not doing that on purpose but twitter had been used for political organizing and quick news spreading during mass protests in multiple countries. There are cases that it was the main means of communication of the people protesting bypassing censorship or downplay of the local news agencies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What’s stopping him from just pulling the plug if that’s his goal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He lost so much money, and he is badly in debt. His wealth is still on bloated Tesla stock, which he cannot sell without destroying the company value. Business genius.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

A lot of us are sure that he doesn’t. He is a very skilled con man though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Im fairly sure hes intentionally destroying twitter

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well he has millions of sycophants that would fucking kill someone of Elon asked them too.

It’s the exact same gift Trump has been pulling off, except instead on constantly begging for donation, hes just “selling” features on twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 481K

    Comments