Republican lawmakers are proposing blocking kids from accessing social media in schools that receive federal broadband subsidies.

52 points

TBH, I’m not generally opposed to this idea. Social media consumption has a lot of negative consequences, and we could all do with a little less in our lives. However, given the source, I don’t trust Republicans to be making these demands in good faith.

What’s going to be funny, though, is the number of tech-saavy kids who know how VPNs work. 🍿

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

The question is whether they will be blocked on school WiFi, or via software on the students’ take home laptops that some schools do. If it’s blocked on the WiFi, the tech savvy kids won’t even need a VPN to get around it. If they have a phone, they can tether it and use their phone’s internet plan instead of the school WiFi. Most android phones have this as a feature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

They all have phones. Which is how most people use social media. There is no need for any of this shit because they will just use their phones with their data plans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bingo. I like the idea, but it’s coming out of a Republicans mouth so there’s something insidious we’re not noticing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Wouldn’t using DuckDuckGo bypass this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

DDG isn’t a vpn

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Y’all know about 5G, right?

We already block social media at a lot of schools. Doesn’t do shit when all you need to do is disconnect from the schools wifi to see what you want…

permalink
report
reply
6 points

In before they address this and propose tracking each student’s phone to see if they are in a school zone (and of course to see much more).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

School would have to provide the phones, not even close to within our budget

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Plus plenty of students just wouldnt accept them an if forced to take them would just toss em into a drawer and forget about them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Not unless we had a large cohort of people doing everything in their power to undermine our freedom and privacy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That would be impossible to do without impacting the ability of neighboring homes to access the internet as well. It’s not like the signals magically stop at the school parking lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Exactly what I’m getting at

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Kids are suspended if caught with a cellphone on school property in our district.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m sure glad that isn’t true in mine. My daughter called me today to tell me she was really sick and the nurse wasn’t going to send her home. I knew my wife has been really sick and so I knew she needed to go to the doctor. I wouldn’t have even heard about it until after she got home from school if she didn’t have a phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This varies greatly from district to district. I know of plenty of schools that do the same. But I also know school districts (and luckily live in one) where this would never fly. They tried doing this during my daughter’s sophomore year of high school, and the parents all said “Oh, fucking no. If I want to be able to get in touch with my kid, I’ll make that decision, not you.”

I also know of districts that tried this and just abandoned the idea because it was nigh-on impossible to enforce without suspending like 90% of the kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I also know of districts that tried this and just abandoned the idea because it was nigh-on impossible to enforce without suspending like 90% of the kids.

That is what is happening. They suspended the Senior class president who was caught with a phone because they were waiting on a college scholarship call.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Easy enough to setup a wifi hotspot in the bathroom and keep it in your pocket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How did they get the ok for that? Kids with cell phones can help in active shooter situations so to remove a tool that potentially could save a lot of lives seems crazy

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

MAGA invaded the school board. They also banned a ton of books.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Honestly, I’m generally okay with this. As long as they don’t push some other agenda along with it.

Social media is, generally, toxic. There are areas that are not but the algos most commercial social media outlets use for engagement are just bad for everyone.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Cutting kids off from social media is all about cutting them off from outside information and support. We desperately need a bill of rights for kids, it’s tragic how many people are fine with treating them like property.

Many abusive parents already control all of their kids’ time outside of school, and for some, the only place to find understanding & support is in forums like r/raisedbynarcissists or LGBT spaces.

Like adults, kids are informed by social media, and if we want to improve their mental health we need to actually address the problems they learn about there, instead of simply preventing them from learning about the real world.

Things like our unwavering march toward an unlivable climate, the malign growth of oppressive, theocratic, authoritarian movements in many governments around the world, the crushing inequitable grind of capitalist culture, or just the ignorant / abusive / bigoted mindset of many fellow citizens are all bad for anyone’s mental health, but they need to be understood accurately to be addressed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It is pretty much technically impossible. Using the phone data plan alone will negate it. I am not against it either in theory but not possible in practice.

Social Media is little overused. Email is social media in reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Social media has legitimate research potential. This doesn’t stop any kid from doing what they’re already doing: using social media on their cell phone with cellular data.

I worry that a bill like this will have riders attached that would change scope drastically. I honestly think in this case it should be up to the school district to self regulate and let the local communities decide what is right in their districts.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Anytime a Republican does something I always believe it is for the worse intentions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

(kicks rocks) I’m gonna have to agree with the Republicans.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 477K

    Comments