For people who want news coverage of this, the are articles from the Associated Press and Reuters

5 points

Too many undefined asterisks. Everytime they say clean energy im skeptical, like its intentionally distinct from renewable energy. Like natural gas projects with carbon offset schemes, or some bullshit like clean coal again.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

Yeah, it would be better to do nothing! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

As opposed to more fossil fuel projects, yeah.

Looking a bit more into the specific projects though, it looks like there’s no energy generating projects at all here, its all distribution infrastructure, with sprinklings of renewable energy wording because they use powerlines too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Your desperation to be displeased, while oh so edgy and endearing to the ladies, isn’t helpful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Clean usually means nuclear is included

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Carbon “sequestration”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Rookie numbers

permalink
report
reply
12 points

It’s part of the Inflation Reduction Act, so it’s far from the only thing happening. My expectation is that consistent with the history of US electric supply, private capital will supply the bulk of what’s needed here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

For sure. This is basically the incentives and kick starting. Sustainable energy and utility production are already massively profitable. This is just a basic usage of the tax system to prioritize and incentivize specific actions for the systems/places that likely need it most.

A ton of private capital will be flowing and it’s likely that many investors and private business owners will get very wealthy from these programs. Not to mention that many others will gain valuable employment.

Will it be completely perfect? Nope. But it’s exactly what developed nations do to create a nice place to live with reliable, advanced infrastructure. And they’ll create many economic windfalls while doing so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’ll take this over nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
16 points

We probably won’t see a dime here in Texas since our dumbass politicians think it’s best to separate ourselves from the grid. In hopes that Texas might sucede or some stupid shit.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

More wind and solar is always awesome! I would say I hope this involves more nuclear power as well, but that just takes so long to get up and running. I still think it’s a good investment, but setting up clean energy that gives more immediate returns is also extremely helpful and could even make building nuclear in the future even easier.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Part of the reason nuclear takes forever is because the contractors don’t have experience with building them. Bit of a catch 22

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators