178 points

How about just not auto-convert everything and keep the integrity of the data unless specifically asked to? Is that so hard?

permalink
report
reply
114 points
*

Microsoft assumes their users are complete idiots, even when they (the users) are actively trying to convince them (Microsoft) otherwise. No matter how advanced the feature may be, they’ll assume you found instructions somewhere to do something entirely unrelated and they constantly have to save you from yourself. As a result you constantly have to fight the OS for access and control to get it to do what you want.
If you’re even a bit of a power user that is, of course.

But more often than not Microsoft’s assumption is probably spot on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That assumption is perfectly good for a default. Not a mandatory feature that power users have to live with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

As a default, sure. Should be one that’s easily changed, though. Repeatedly fighting the machine that’s supposed to do your bidding and make your life easier gets old rather quickly. A machine you own and administrate, let’s not forget that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Excel is inherently flawed in its design.

The thing is, that excel already has half the means of what would be necessary to really fix this bug. That is a field for each cell where the original text can stay.

An excel sheet is just a bunch of XML files zipped in a specific structure. You can unpack a file and look for yourself.
Each worksheet is it’s own file and each cell is subdivided into the value and the formula, that generated this value (or nothing, if there is no formula).
Excel could easily fix this issue by adding another possible cell attribute like “original” or “plain” that, when set, allows you to roll back any conversion.

But no, they go a half assed way as always and screw up even more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

In order to do that I think they would first have to ratify a standards change to the Excel format, which is open.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Uh, I mean kinda…

Excel implements two Microsoft file format standards:

  • ECMA-376
  • ISO 29500

Those are not the same and even incompatible in parts. It is correct, that Microsoft tries to use ISO 29500 more, but most files (2007) still are ECMA-376.

But yes, they kinda would have to change their shitty, ISO-incompatible ISO “standard” to fix this issue this way.

Or use the formula field, idk. 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Excel is never ever going to break backwards compatability. In fact, quite some “features” in Excel are just there to stay bug-for-bug compatible with existing systems.

Example: Excel stores dates internally as a float - called the serial date, you can view it by running DATEVALUE on any cell that contains a date. It is supposed to be the number of days since 1 January 1900. However, since early Excel versions had to be compatible with Lotus1-2-3, Excel had to be compatible with a bug in Lotus123: they had erroneously assumed 1900 to be a leap year. In addition, the indexing is off by one. So the actual 0 epoch of an Excel serial date is 30 December 1899 for all dates starting 1 March 1900.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

Me before reading the article: It’s got to be dates. Excel thinks everything is a date.

Me after reading the article: Even the workaround is halfhearted. Jeebus.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Microsoft’s blog adds caveats, such as that Excel avoids the conversion by saving the data as text, which means the data may not work for calculations later. There’s also a known issue where you can’t disable the conversions when running macros.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Apart from actual dates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

The idea that any scientist is doing data analysis in Excel is honestly terrifying on every level.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

You don’t want to know…

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I remember when a biologist asked us for help - Excel crashed on processing his 700MB tables. Took some time and Chatgpt to convince him to do the analysis in R. It worked out in the end and he is now recommending this solution to his colleagues, which is nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Flashback to the time the UK government lost 16,000 positive COVID patients because Excel has a 1 million row limit.

If only there were better ways of storing large amounts of records with a fixed structure. Maybe the future will provide such technology…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And is so bad at it that they can’t work around this issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Excel is excellent at data analysis… Python integrations and everything

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

As an alternative, maybe just Python?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Because every scientist is also a programmer?
Especially if they struggle to use Excel properly, no chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Excel sucks open ass. At storing data, at displaying data, at analyzing data. Scientists, of all people, should understand how to use an RDBMS and a data processing framework like R.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I believe that accessibility is what makes Excel so good. And the world agrees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve seen idiots doing “bioinformatics” with excel & vba. FFS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

What the hell else is there? Good luck getting universities using OpenOffice

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Scientists should be using programming languages like R or Python. They are both extremely popular in this field, much more than Excel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Shoulda coulda. Not everyone is a programmer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Thank god! You have no idea how awful this is for scientists. Need to paste some gene names down? Better hope it’s not MARCHF8 or in the Septin gene family, otherwise you have to convert columns to text then import the data. Seems like a simple fix, but many wet lab biologists are technologically challenged.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

It’s no good having this as part of the user options. It should be a sheet characteristic and the default should be “keep cells exactly as entered regardless of data type”.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Changing the default will break the workflows of tens of thousands in the business industry

Scientists should be using something like MATLAB, not Excel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Matlab is used, if at all, by physicists.

We’re talking about molecular biologists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You could make a new filetype, default new versions to it, & not break compatibility. Wouldn’t do anything for existing workbooks, and keep xlsx an option, but “it would break compatibility” is not a be-all end-all argument against this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They’re not doing their analysis in Excel. MATLAB solves no problems here?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 554K

    Comments