Do you think that it’s possible to build a web service to chat compatible with email , xmpp and matrix?
(and why not even with activityPub or rocketChat ?? )

[exemple and why in the post…]

7 points
*

Email is not chat (and there isn’t a nice gateway for Deltachat AFAIK), otherwise yes that is possible. I run a modern IRC network that can be fully used with federated XMPP and Matrix accounts.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Nice! :)
Do you have to setup a bridge/bot for each room? Or is it at configuration at the server level?

For exemple if I have a matrix account and I use Element to create a new channel and invite some guys with IRC and some with XMPP?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

No, it’s all automatic, but the core is IRCv3 so some knowledge of IRC is good to have for some more advanced features like channel registration and moderation.

But yes, you can create a channel though the Matrix portal and then share the link to it to IRC and XMPP users, just the syntax for these links is somewhat different for each protocol. Ideally, I could modify the XMPP invite portal (similar to matrix.to but easier to modify) to also work for Matrix and the IRC web-client, but so far they are separate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thank you :)

That sounds not so complex for me.

But I think of no-technical guys and I think that create a channel and share the link is already to complex! I mean, I can teach them that, but that’s not obvious as Signal or similar app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think Matrix has bridges to all these networks, except ActivityPub (it may, I just don’t know).

permalink
report
reply
1 point

That’s right, but it’s not activated by default. And it’s not easy at all.

I tried for myself but that require that I configure bridge for the server, then for each room, with some strange /command I have to remember.

When I think of a service I mean a service that anyone can use, even the no tech guys.
It’s nice that it’s technically possible, though! :)

The biggest part of the question is more a UI/UX question then a technical one actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Have you heard of Beeper?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

@sylphio @lascapi

> Beeper Clients
> Native iOS and Android clients (closed source forks of Element iOS and Android)
> Mac OS, Windows and Linux clients (closed source forks of Element Web/Desktop)

How can they make a closed source fork of an open source (Apache-2.0) project?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hi :) yes I did. And I tried. 🙂

It’s a great multi protocol app. But you cannot chat in the same conversation with two different protocol. :/

And there is no xmpp support.

Even for the matrix federation it was possible only with the desktop app.

So that’s not that I looking for.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Thunderbird works with email xmpp and matrix

permalink
report
reply
1 point

That’s right but you cannot create a conversation between you and a guy with xmpp and another one with matrix.

That’s my question. :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve wondered before now about an e-mail system which hosts the emails on one’s own device, and uses the activity-pub protocol : decentralised email, I guess…

The closest I’ve seen is Tox.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

E-mail is already decentralised

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They’re kept on other people’s servers, is what I meant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

You can run your own mail server and keep your emails on a device you control instead of e.g., gmail.

It’s non-trivial so most people stick with letting someone else handle it. Just like you’re probably not running your own Lemmy instance, but Lemmy is still decentralized.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The problem with peer2peer messaging is:

Though several apps that use the Tox protocol seem similar in function to regular instant messaging apps, the lack of central servers similar to XMPP or Matrix currently has the consequence that both parties of the chat need to be online for the message to be sent and received (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tox_(protocol)#Usability_as_an_instant_messenger )

That’s why I think about using only decentralized protocol.

Both (decentralized and p2p) are usefull, but that not the same usage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s nice, but it looks like a workaround.

I can do it for myself because I’m a geek (but I don’t want to), but if I say to my friends/colleagues that they need another smartphone at home they are going to look at me like I’m crazy !! 🫣

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Yes… I guess if someone were to only use Tox, the device they were using it on would have to be on all the time, with one of the Tox clients running at least in the background.


Addendum At least you know when the other person is online… There’s some advantage to that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Open Source

!opensource@lemmy.ml

Create post

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments