Republicans have at long last elected a House speaker: Representative Mike Johnson, a fundamentalist Christian who was also once called a key “architect” in Congress’s efforts to overthrow the 2020 election.

Johnson finally secured the speaker’s gavel after Republican infighting left the House without a speaker for 22 days. He secured 220 votes.

Johnson is a four-term congressman representing Louisiana. His win also represents the rise of the MAGA front in the Republican Party. Earlier Wednesday morning, Donald Trump endorsed Johnson as House speaker—after quickly killing Mike Emmer’s nomination the day before.

365 points

This next election is going to be an absolute shitshow. I guarantee they’ll refuse to certify the election, and they’ll try to hijack the electoral college (again).

permalink
report
reply
105 points

The 119th Congress will be seated on January 3rd 2025 and the presidential election certification will be January 6th. So if the Dems win the majority in 2024, they won’t have the power to deny certificatation outright. Though, I’m sure a minority will still object to every swing state like they did in 2020, just to draw it out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Fascism just keeps coming back and we gotta stave it off again

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Weeds needs trimming. Or in this case punching, stomping, and and a good old dick twist

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The cost of freedom is eternal vigilance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

And even if the 119th Congress was exactly the same as this one, the House Republicans can only do so much.

First, they would need to object to Electoral Votes with a Senator. (Unfortunately, this wouldn’t be hard for them to do.) Next, the House and Senate would separate to vote on each objection. Only if both chambers voted to set the Electoral Votes aside would they be set aside.

With a Democratic Senate, this won’t happen.

So the House Republicans can slow things down, but they won’t be able to overturn elections. This isn’t to say that there aren’t threats on the state and local level. There are. And if the Republicans gain control of the House and Senate, I could see them sustaining objections because “it must be fraud if Biden won,” thus giving the election to Trump. That just shows why it’s more important than ever to vote blue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They are very unlikely to win the majority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

I’m betting on this guy not lasting until November 2024 (not sure what the over/under is on November 17, 2023).

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

How do you think he’ll get removed? It took them this long to agree on someone to elect, it seems unlikely enough of them would agree to remove him. They could maybe get the Democrats along with a small subset of Republicans to vote him out like the last time, but I’m not sure the Democrats would be up for that. Maybe if they wait until right before the election, but I can’t imagine the GOP being dumb enough to oust the speaker right before elections happen (although that does raise the question of who certifies the election if there’s no speaker. I’m assuming the speaker pro tem?).

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Yeah, this is the guy the MAGAs could support. The little rebellion is over, and they got what they wanted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

deleted by creator

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The only possible chance the democrats don’t collectively vote him out, given the chance, is if the budget hasn’t gone through yet. Otherwise, they will take any call to eject the speaker as an opportunity to oust him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I tend to agree, but let’s remember that Republicans ousted McCarthy, it only took one member requesting to call for a vote, and they had had a giant number of votes to get him in initially. Those maga Republicans are nutty, I wouldn’t count on them not getting pissed off and trying to break all the toys again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

What are the chances election denial just become the new norm indefinitely?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bold of you to assume that they’ll hang on to their majority. I don’t see how they do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Trump won’t even be on the ballot in most states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

“this one’s marked Jesus Christ”

“Yeah we count those as for the Republican”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Donaghy you magnificent son of a bitch!

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Hopefully, but I also doubt that will stop them trying to elect him anyway. Or if not him I’m sure they’ll find someone worse. I doubt we’re going to see another Democrat elected in the next few elections that doesn’t result in them trying to refuse to certify the election and just in general whine and complain while throwing around baseless accusations. If we’re lucky that’s as far as it goes, but considering how many parallels to 1920s Germany we’re seeing lately I’m very worried the MAGAts recent fascist dabblings are just a taste of things to come.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Outrageously false.

There is nothing that even comes close to settling that in any state at this point. Any speculation on the matter is as good as a handful of shit. Less, maybe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Colorado has already blocked him from the ballot under the 14th Amendment Section three. Only a 2/3 vote in Congress will change that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I wonder if that also makes write-ins invalid…

Like is he just removed from the ballot, or is he ineligible altogether?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Election law varies from state to state. But generally from what I gather, a write-in candidate is only valid if the candidate registers with the state in advance.

If there’s a winning plurality for Mickey Mouse in your state for a statewide office, it won’t matter. The state won’t be forced to see if there’s anyone there that has the name Mickey Mouse and then pick which (if more than one) was the individual meant by the voters. Someone has to register with the state saying that they’re going to run a write-in campaign for office with name XYZ.

Note that these details are a bit of a side track. The above person was talking about Trump being excluded due to the 14th amendment. However that doesn’t say “not on the ballot” — it invalidates people from office entirely. If applied to Trump, the not being on the ballot would be a consequence of being determined ineligible for office, not a method to make him unable to win. Also it’s all moot: while I think on the face of it the correct action would be to apply the 14th amendment to Trump, the fact of the matter is that this will not happen. States are not going to be willing to risk the political backlash from going down that path, so they will not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wait really?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No. Not really. Not even a little bit.

There ARE legal challenges in some states, however. To date, none of those are even close to being settled

permalink
report
parent
reply
249 points

a fundamentalist Christian

Yeah… we just call them christofascists these days.

permalink
report
reply
92 points

I just call them Republicans means the same thing now

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Yup. Always has been. Proven time and time again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

Classic. You continue to generalize while ignoring the large diverse reasons these idiots vote this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Sure, lets start with racism, homophobia, ignorance, religion and greed. What other reasons do these idiots have for voting for politicians even pond scum looks down on?

Either way, they’re supporting shitty people and making life worse for everyone else just because they can, so fuck em.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Go on. It’ll be funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Nat-c’s for short.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

And, he’s 3rd in line to the presidency.

Fucking fascists. This close to control. What a sad state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Isn’t he second in line after VP?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I did nat-c that coming… yeah, it works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nazi and/or traitor work as well

Much shorter, too

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
148 points

“Breaking: Giant piece of shit selected by a bunch of other pieces of shit. Nation shocked”

permalink
report
reply
21 points

“I’m shocked… SHOCKED… well, not really… not even a little.” — Nation

permalink
report
parent
reply
-75 points

Wait they elected Pelosi again ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

You… do understand the Republicans control the… nevermind

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They do, these asshats just refuse to believe they elect more than just greedy assholes, they elect the worst of the worst kinds of people so they need to deflect and say “you elected a jerk too so everything is even and I don’t have to worry about the people I elected.” It’s ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-40 points

You realize it was a joke because Pelosi is a piece of shit too

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

This mf is third in line for the US presidency?

Please tell me I’m wrong. I hope I’m fucking wrong. Wtf America

permalink
report
reply
90 points
*

Please tell me I’m wrong. I hope I’m fucking wrong. Wtf America

Do you want the good news or the bad news first?

I’ll start with the good news first

You’re wrong. He’s not third in line for the US presidency.

The bad news is

He’s second. VP -> Speaker

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Oh great, what’s the real good news? Anything? Anything? /sadsack

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I got into wine about a month ago and wish I had sooner. It really isn’t as expensive as I thought it would be. I can buy a bottle of stuff I and my wife enjoy for about 20 bucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It would require two people to either die or resign. Granted the President is like 130 and the Presidency ages you in dog years so the likelihood he dies in office is higher than most. But then there’s a healthy Kamala Harris next up who gets to pick her own VP, who would then become first in line.

While I disagree with Kamala Harris on pretty much everything and don’t think she would make a good President, she’d be a lot better than this wanker.

The down side is it does position him high in the Republican Party making him a presumptive front runner unless another option emerges.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Sorry, no good news other than he was wrong as hoped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He and the Republican conference look so ridiculous that it will diminish the Republicans’ election chances in 2024. Voters don’t want abortion to be banned and feel iffy about January 6th, so there’s a strong chance that 2024 will be dismal for Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So all the Republicans would have to do is assassinate the President and they have their own puppet in the office to sabotage the nation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

No, second-in-line means there’s one person before them: the Vice President

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Every single state is gerrymandered to all hell. No we didn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

California isn’t. We have an independent third party organization that draws the districts.

Heck Massachusetts is actually gerrymandered to hell and gone, but that’s just because of the Dems sense of fair play. They made sure that the Republicans have a single district that they have a shot at winning. Gerrymandering isn’t always a bad thing. It’s just always a bad thing when Republicans are doing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points
*

Hey it could be worse. You could be living in China or India.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

The “it could always be worse” fallacy. I’ll remember to ignore the chronic pain in my leg from a catastrophic injury because that guy over there is dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

It always can be worse. Perspective is important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I didn’t expect to see such opinion outside of village Бухалово. This is why our countries are fucked. Keep saying “it could always be worse” each time new bottom is penetrated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Yes

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

What do we call 200 people who sit together with 20 Fascists?

permalink
report
reply
48 points
  1. Nazis
  2. Republicans

They’re the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
  1. United Russia
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m just surprised the space bar allowed me to put so much distance between them tbh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

220 fascists

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They need 220 Volts and 220 Amperes

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments