84 points

“Make google search suck less” is something that they didn’t consider.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Defeat the competition by making a good product yourself?? I don’t think so! Stifling innovation is the only way to succeed!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s the best reason to have a monopoly, other than money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Anyone who never got a chance to use Google Now back in the day really missed out! One of Google’s most useful products to date. It would provide you with the most useful/timely information before you even knew you needed it. Word is, it was so useful that people stopped needing to actively use Google’s services to get the info they needed so they scrapped it. Bastards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes, I remember that! I recall thinking, imagine how good this will get in the future. Sadly it didn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I remember when you could find what you were looking for by googling it. Those were good days. Seriously though, google search, google maps and many other google products simply do not work anymore. They deliberately removed functionality for short term monetary gain and have lost the dominance they once had simply due to their products not working the way they did 10 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They have no interest in making search better. When 2 out of every 3 searches go through your platform either way, good results lead to fewer page loads which results in lost ad revenue. How are they going to afford to pay Apple $18 billion/year if everyone is getting the info they need?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Google is still the best in my experience, at least for stuff I search for. As long as they’re just slightly better what reason do they have to improve?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah this is the issue. I’ve been trying DDG and while it’s got less bloat it’s either the same as Google or less accurate 99% of the time. There are times I was searching for something I had found before and had to switch back to Google because it wasn’t coming up in DDG

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Trying to get back to Google after a few years on DDG then Qwant felt really off. Kagi was the real deal for me but it is still to expensive for the average consumer 😕

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My first few experiences with Kagi were good, on par with Google, but my latest weren’t. Especially in my local language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

$5 is too expensive? People have $1,200 phones on financing, buy $5 coffee on the way to work, still drive gasoline vehicles when fuel is $4-6 (in the states) to go ~20 miles, pay $16 for Netflix… like whut? Shit, I’m disabled and living off social security and I still found room in my budget for $5.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My last experiences with Google were non-trivial privacy policy consent request popups that made me leave.

The one before was having to clean up my mother’s laptop after she installed a popular FOSS program from a search result ad infested with ad and malware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah there was just an article on ars about malware from an ad pretending to be keepass.

https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/10/google-hosted-malvertising-leads-to-fake-keepass-site-that-looks-genuine/

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

would be nice if somebody was serious about search considering Google has all but abandoned it

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I agree. However Apple might be trading evil for evil. I wish the Wikimedia Foundation or similar would take on search.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is my concern. That Apple just forcefully uses its dominance while it still argues its “smaller” than the necessary theeshold for competititive dominance or at least that it remains smaller than like Google and Microsoft in terms of its market share of whatever category()

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If they were to enter search, they would exploit their dominant iPhone market position (at least in the US).

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Eh, wiki has its own skeletons and is too politically motivated to provide actual search results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Plenty people and products are serious about search.

It’s just that Google is so dominant and established, it’s not gonna just disappear or be replaced on a grand scale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

It’s kinda hard imagining Apple getting into search with how squeaky clean they tend to be about things. Like… picture an Apple search engine returning porn results. Just doesn’t really compute.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Apple got into search years ago, though. If you search in Safari, Apple will provide a single top result (if it has one) above your selected search engine results. Search for a famous person from history and you’ll most likely get a Wikipedia link at the top with the picture and small excerpt. This is powered by Apple’s own search engine. It’s not limited to Wikipedia either but is powered by their Applebot web crawler. If you want to be able to see more than one result, you can use the Spotlight search by swiping down on the home screen. Depending on your search term you’ll have a Websites section with multiple results from their search engine.

What Apple doesn’t offer is a web page for you to access their search engine. Even without it, though, many millions of people have been using Apple’s search engine for years now, clicking on the results usually without even realizing that’s where it came from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Interesting I hadn’t heard that before. I wonder how sanitized, if at all, those search results are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Just for you I did a couple of quick searches and discovered something extraordinary. I’ll leave out most of the specific terms I tried but basically anything for an explicit topic just doesn’t have web results at all. It merely offers to search in the browser using your default search engine.

“Masturbation” also had no Apple web results but pulled up a Shortcuts result with the option to turn on the “Do Not Disturb Focus”!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Go change your default search engine on Apple. It’s real easy, I have mine set to DuckDuckGo but they have tons of options that I’ve never heard of.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I was hoping NYT dug up something actually sketchy, but the contents of this article are a nothingburger.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 538K

    Comments