6 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Newly elected House Speaker Mike Johnson is a hardcore Christian nationalist who has a history of spouting extreme right-wing views — including on mass shootings.

The Louisiana Republican’s record on guns has come under scrutiny in the wake of a shooter killing at least 18 people in Maine on Wednesday, and in addition to opposing gun control legislation, the man who is now second in line for the presidency has blamed mass shootings on both teaching evolution and abortion.

When you break up the nuclear family, when you tell a generation of people that life has no value, no meaning, that it’s expendable, then you do wind up with school shooters.”

He’s advocated for the return of prayer in public schools, derided the “so-called separation of church and state” on the House floor, and argued that the nation’s founders did not establish the separation to prevent religion from influencing government, but rather to impede the government from restricting the influence and free exercise of religion.

The new House Speaker is also a diehard Trump supporter who worked to overturn the 2020 election, and so it shouldn’t come as a huge surprise that he doesn’t view the United States as a democracy.

It’s not just majority rule, it’s a constitutional republic, and the founders set that up because they followed the biblical definition of what a civil society is supposed to look like.”


The original article contains 590 words, the summary contains 232 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
115 points

American politicians blaming school shootings on anything other than easy access to guns (any%)

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Love this speedrun! Can’t wait for the 100% run!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

[Summoning Salt theme is playing]

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

They’d much rather disolve the education system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Can we just disolve as a nation already? Start an auction state by state to different countries?

Clearly we cannot manage the simple act of self governance. The experiment is over and we failed.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I call dibs on Norway

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You mean norway calls dibs on you

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They don’t want you. 😁

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Choices, choices! I think we can only take one or two states. Which ones should we pick?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Honestly I’m here for a CA/OR/WA Western seaboard alliance. Hawaii can go back to being governed by natives but can ally with us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

3.6t + .3t + .73t = 4.63t using 2022 nom GDP

Which would make the Western Seaboard the #3 economy in the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_GDP
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m all for this too. The Western landlocked states would be screwed not having access to the Pacific ports as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nah they can have access… for a price.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Laughs in Colorado

That’s a nice Imperial Valley agricultural industry you got there, it’d be a shame if we just dammed the Colorado at the Utah border.

Unless CA could convince OR/WA to give them more water, the inland states are critical for freshwater here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Cascadia, my dream is Cascadia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think some of the northeastern states could likely form a similarly powerful and cohesive country.

Alberta can join Montana and the Dakotas if they hate Canada so much.

Maybe BC could join the Western Seaboard, too.

It’ll probably never happen… but who knows? The relative stability of countries and international borders is a recent phenomenon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
1 point

As always

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Hell no. Give it back to the rightful owners. Most of the east coast goes back to Britain. The Netherlands can have New York and Pensylvania back. There probably something for Germany as well, I’m don’t know the exact histories of all states. The French and the spanish can divide the south. California can become a free nation, because it can support itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Your second and third sentences directly contradict each other so badly, I am shocked they do not destroy one another via touch akin to anti matter and matter touching one another

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s weird. Both seconds of research I did, were very conclusive!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

> rightful owners

> European countries

Hmmm…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The experiment “self-government for the colonies” has been declared a failure. We’re coming back!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Britain enters the chat

Typing …

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Mate we can’t afford it right now. Maybe if Florida ends up in the bargain bin?

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

“Christian nationalist”…So no surprise.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Oh fun already huh.

permalink
report
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 6K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 125K

    Comments