1 point

Starting up wikis is so easy nowadays that there’s no excuse. I maintain a few Dokuwiki-based ones, it’s my preferred engine for simple wiki stuff, but Mediawiki (the same one that powers Wikipedia) is not bad either and not really too difficult, just a bit more demanding storage-wise. Heck, you can currently fire-and-forget DW-based wikis on SDF’s “one payment” access tier, even! Probably on Neocities too, haven’t checked.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

I’ve always advocated against using Fandom. Not much customization and so many ads it makes the platform downright unusable.

A much better alternative is Wiki.gg, created by some of the original founders of Fandom.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Great suggestion, thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

TLDR; Fandom has a lot of QAnon articles written to make the scams seem legitimate to less computer savvy people.

My mom has fallen in a Qanon conspiracy world. The people from that world write Fandom articles about themselves to make it seem legitimate. I found them when I started investigating these people trying to convince her to steer clear.

I don’t trust a single thing on Fandom anymore.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

no such thing as ethical consumption under capitalism.

we have to use a decentralized open alternative (like lemmy) to take back control, switching to a proprietary solution by yet another company will only delay the problem further.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Or we could just… host our own wikis. There’s plenty of open source software for them. It’s not hard. Not everything needs to be federated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

that was my suggestion, sort of.

it can be bigger than that too ofc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

no such thing as ethical consumption under capitalism.

There was a time, long ago, where companies actually cared about their customers, and wanted to sell them good products while making a profit, and they strived for the win - win, and the “customer is always right” philosophy. They took their fair share, and they didn’t triy to squeeze every last dime out of their customers with crappy products.

Not that that they were saints by any stretch of the imagination (there were definitely bad players back then too) but there used to be a sense of ethics with Capitalism, in America at least, a sense of products being warrantied to work the way they should be and advertised as how they would actually work.

I have no effing idea how to get back to that state, as it seems like the “lunch for wimps” crowd are running the c-suites these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Regulation. Take the money out of governing, both national government and private directors. If someone makes decisions that affect many people, make that person accountable, either through a competitive market or a functioning justice system.

The problem is that the fantastically efficient tool that is capitalism will try to increase it reach as much as possible. Killing competition and undermining laws will always be the end goal, so long as they are in anyway allowed.

The reason companies used to care is because not caring drove customers to the competition. But then there was no competition, and the care evaporated. As long as they are allowed, they will take. Civility can only be guaranteed if profits are on the line.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

No way of going back to that state unless we start from scratch, power is too consolidated as it is. And capitalism would soon evolve back to something like this eventually anyway.

We are on late stage capitalism now, as predicted by Marx.

e: also those better times werent that good either if you werent white/from somewhere rich, not long ago kids were working in coal mines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

decentralized open alternative (like lemmy) to take back control

which unfortunately still require capital to run

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

of course it does.

and better if that capital comes from a network of companies/volunteers instead of one monolithic corporation that can just bully everyone into their will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

food?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nestle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

We can’t just get out of capitalism, but you can work to improve your situation. If you have a yard, grow a garden.

Also, see if there’s a mutual aid group in your area, and if not consider talking with your neighbors about what you can do to help each other out. One person might be good with car Maintanance. Another might be a good gardener. Everyone can contribute something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Gardening will not solve the climate crisis because it won’t offset the millions of tons of co2 being emitted.

It would help, sure, but we have to radically change production to stop it. Currently the rich own those, so the best we can do short of removing them is plead.

Also yes, you can’t just get rid of capitalism, history shows it takes years/decades of planning and organizing. Start as soon as possible because I don’t think we have all that much time.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 8.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.4K

    Posts

  • 92K

    Comments