191 points

I’d like to see a law where this immediately dissolves the company.

permalink
report
reply
94 points

Yep, there needs to be real consequences. In addition, no member of that board or executive team should be able to act in those positions in any company for like 5 yrs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

They should be in prison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

That would be a very effective way to keep them out of those positions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

The rich and powerful don’t live by the same set of laws, so there won’t be. Best they can do is a slap on the wrist with no further impact.

Amazon has remained untouched from their price fixing, AmazonBasic product rip offs, union busting, poor worker conditions, etc.

This too shall pass uneventfully

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Corporation - n.

An ingenious method for securing individual profit without individual responsibility.

  • Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Damn you for being exactly right!

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

Honestly, I don’t think the company needs to be dissolved, but I think that accountability for the law should exist at director level and up. For a company the size of Amazon, that’s probably around 100 people that should face the consequences - and that’s only the retail org.

The best description of Amazon is that it is a management company. It’s not a retailer, or a tech company. It’s output is its management process, and it’s this that it uses to build products in different markets.

So, remove the source of those processes. Let people move up to higher roles, and let someone not breaking the law take the senior positions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Hold everyone who works at amazon and every shareholder responsible. Because they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Are the dudes moving packages in warehouses responsible?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah but then how would I be able to get that napkin holder that I ordered in my underwear delivered tomorrow! You don’t understand how much I need this thing right now even though I can’t be bothered to get dressed and drive my ass to the store.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

How about if the company is so large and sewn into the fabric of the modern world then instead of dissolving the company it instantly becomes a public utility, turn the shares into treasury bonds, and jail the executives?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

I don’t really see any other company building massive warehouses that employs millions of underserved people and providing them with decent paying jobs with good benefits. I don’t think 1.6million Americans should be unemployed because of shady actions of the execs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yeah because Amazon kills off all the competition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It wasn’t necessarily Amazon that killed of the competition, it’s the tech behind Amazon (e-commerce) that killed retail stores. Just like UBER demolished the taxi industry, just like cars replaced horse carriages, and just like AI’s about to make knowledge workers completely obsolete. Amazon still has a great deal of competition from Walmart, Target, and lots of retailers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

People are still fling to buy shit. Maybe they have to do it locally instead? Probably some other company would step up to replace their monopoly. It’s only be an improvement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

So we should just make almost 2 million Americans unemployed because some execs shredded some papers. I don’t know if you know anything about retail work, but they pay less than Amazon does, very few actually pay over $15 an hour, Walmart starts you out at $12 an hour.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t think forcing people to work in inhumane conditions while paying them close to nothing, so that they still need to use food stamps, counts as employing. It sounds more like exploiting the most vulnerable people, which have no other employment option, because big monopolies like Amazon killed all the competition

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

No one’s forced to work at Amazon. For unskilled uneducated Americans $16 an hour is higher than what you can make in retail or fast food, which are some of the only options left especially for Americans in the rust belt. It’s not monopolies that killed jobs that used to provide livable wages like manufacturing it’s globalization. I’m not mad at your ignorance because I didn’t realize how bad parts of America were until I moved to the rust belt. If you want to blame anyone for the lack of quality employment for undeducated Americans blame the politicians and greedy companies that let high paying jobs go overseas to China and Mexico.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s a myth that corporations are job creators. Their very premise is that they can do the same job for less because they have fewer labor costs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
134 points

wow, turns out that telling criminals that youre going to be looking for evidence in a few months isn’t actually a good idea. who could have guessed?

permalink
report
reply
33 points
*

If you have the list of all documents before and after, you let the defendant do the discovery for you

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If you have some drugs in your home, police will do a no-knock raid.

If you steal billions, they let you know months in advance and also adapt to your schedule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points

of course they did, the penalty for getting caught destroying evidence is far, far less than the penalty for the price fixing they’re accused of. the law is designed to incentivize them to do this.

we could make it so that the penalty for destroying evidence in a court case once its been subpoenaed is twice the penalty of the original case, but we don’t. we could make CEOs responsible for the actions of their employees (after all, they’re quick to claim responsibility for the actions of their employees when those actions generate money), but we don’t.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

It’s not though. It usually laxed but generally rules of procedure allow a judge to accept spoliation as proof of the crime they’re accused of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not going to stop until we start holding executives physically responsible for their crimes in disfiguring ways. “Why is the right half of your face missing, Bob?” “Insider trading” he writes on an index card because he’s been debarked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

I will only be surprised if someone actually ends up going to prison. More likely, the company will just get hit with a fine that’s just the cost of doing business.

Although Romney said, “Corporations are people too, my friend” you can’t throw Amazon in jail.

Closest they can do is a forced break up. A “Ma Bell” so to speak 🔔

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I am sure they hired a fall guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Amazon now has to direct all managers watch a data retention video every year for the next five years, is allowed two years to roll this out, and can appeal in 3 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Just behead them all and be done with it, we know they’re guilty.

permalink
report
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments