Legal analysts say Trump admitted that the intent in financial representations he made was to convince lenders to loan him money.

128 points

Imagine being this genius’ lawyer

permalink
report
reply
72 points

A plausible sounding article I read stated that his lawyers knew from the start that they didn’t have a chance of winning anyway. This whole thing is just theater to try and stall as long as possible to buy time until the election.

I’m sure they’ve already got plans to cheat their way to a “victory” on that front as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

But also taking time to give him a proper trial ensures that the final ruling is constitutional and can’t risk being declared a mistrial later on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

His own lawyers declined to question him lmao Knew he’d just make things even worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Isn’t it pretty typical for defendents to not take the stand?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This is a civil, not criminal trial. Can’t self incriminate if it’s not a criminal trial, so the 5th amendment doesn’t apply (not sure how it works if there’s other trials ongoing with cross interest in testimony).

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Hope they got paid up front…

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

Narrator: “they didn’t.”

(Which really goes to show how incompetent they are.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Only people Trump ever paid on time, or at all, was businesses connected to the Russian Mob.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nah, they got paid in “exposure” (to ridicule, sanctions, and indictments!)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

People keep saying this but honesty if you dont have anything going for you… Why not do it for free?

I know bugger all about law but surely everyone will know you in the profession, and if you mange to do anything close to a good job, then you get some kind of credibility from it?

Seems like a yolo opportunity for anyone wanting to make a name for themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Ahh the good old “exposure “ argument.

It’s refreshing seeing it applied to lawyers instead of artists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

At this level there is much more to lose than gain. Trump can literally threaten your law license. The exposure isn’t worth the risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m beginning to think MAGA stands for make attorneys get aneurisms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Make Attorneys Get Attorneys

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Sure, that’s already happened. Watching Trump jeopardize Chris Kise’s legal career with games on the stand tho… This may be the first time a defense attorney just pops a blood vessel wanting to scream “SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU’RE MAKING IT WORSE YOU RIDICULOUS FUCKNUT”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

His lawyer went to a law school that doesn’t require LSAT scores 😆

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yale or Harvard?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

She’s been auditioning for a spot on Fox the entire time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

Great quote from a Slate op-ed: “You can often protect your client against the government, but you can never protect him against himself.”

permalink
report
reply
96 points

The thing I love most about this article is this one throw-away little line right here:

He … claims that all of his legal troubles amount to “election interference” as he campaigns in the 2024 presidential election.

It just illustrates who Trump is so well. First, he hears a term that he doesn’t understand, like: “election interference”. Like what he did when he incited his cult of morons to attack the capitol during January 6th to prevent Congress from certifying the election. Then, he takes that term that he doesn’t understand and uses it improperly to insinuate that that’s what’s being done to him. This is either because he’s too dumb to know what it means and too stubborn to look it up, or because he believes that about his cultists.

This is the exact same playbook he used for “puppet” during his debates with Hillary, “Fake news” when he was campaigning, “witch hunt” when he was being investigated for impeachable offenses, etc.

The man is a complete god damned moron, and yet somehow, he’s managed to figure out that a significant number of Americans are even dumber than he is, and he has become their messiah. It’s awe-inducing.

permalink
report
reply

This is what fascists do. They co-opt the language of their political opponents, and divorce any meaning from the word.

The strategy is to deny their opponents the vocabulary they need to organize. This is part of the same strategy as burning books that teach black history and banning students from saying the word gay.

They never taught their slaves how to read either

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What’s the counter to this strategy of theirs, is there one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

To not focus on the semantics but the main point. It’s obvious whoever is doing it is being childish and immature so the counter tactic is to be the adult in the room and to talk to them as if they were a child you were disciplining.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

That’s not Trump not understanding what things mean, that’s modern Republican messaging strategy. MTG literally just called a protest Tlaib led “an insurrection” last week. They water down words until they have no meaning anymore, and explicitly accuse the other side of what they’re doing to feed the “both sides” narrative, and take weight off genuine accusations from Democrats or the media. They’ve been doing it for a while. They’ve also done it with “weaponization of government” recently and a few other words and phrases I can’t think of right now. This is why people talk about Republicans being hypocrites and “projecting”. They do it very much on purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

He’s watering down the terms. “Fake news” is a perfect example. He completely stole the term and directed attention away from all the literally fake news websites created to help his election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Can’t attribute that to Trump, news themselves watered down “fake news” when they started putting up fact checks that weren’t very factfull

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

You don’t have to be smart to be a conman. And being not the brightest bulb in any room, might actually help Trump doing what he does best (conning people): ethical or non gullible people are very quickly put off by him, leaving him surrounded by unethical people who have no qualms enabling him (as long as they believe that they stand to gain from it) + gullible people that can be milked for all their worth. This is why it was such a smart move for Trump to leave the democratic party and become a republican: the republican party loves gullible voters + unethical fellow travellers. Basically the same reasoning as to why spam phishing mail is so obvious usually: scammers don’t want to waste their time on non gullible people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

This is why Jerry Falwell approached Ronald Reagan: they both loved money, power, and authority that those provide. Falwell provided Reagan with millions of followers who had been brainwashed from birth to blindly obey a male authority figure. Hence, the modern Republican Party: millions of “Christians” whose beliefs are diametrically opposed to the teachings of their God. Cognitive dissonance at it’s finest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

He’s a moron’s idea of an intelligent man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

He’s genius is in his ability to market himself. the fact that he is a moron just means he’s often stumbling on stupid shit that will resonate with morons, and he has that keen sense to take advantage of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Trump’s defense strategy: “No, YOU!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points
*

Why is this colossal? The judge already ruled he committed fraud, are we pretending that he lied about his finances to convince ponies to let him brush their hair? What other intent could there be besides getting more money?

permalink
report
reply
64 points

Now they don’t have to prove his intent. It just makes the case that much easier; no way the defense can raise questions about errors or revisions.

Not that it would matter much, but it basically eliminates any possibility of arguments around it, futile as they may be. Which means there’ll be no time wasted on it (or at most, less time wasted on it).

Just because something seems obvious doesn’t mean it isn’t necessary to prove it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Fair enough, time certainly is of the essence in these cases. We got about a year to put this man somewhere he can’t hurt anyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not gonna happen. No matter how this trial goes. I know I sound cynical, I want to be wrong. I don’t think he sees a cell, and if somehow he does I bet he runs for president from there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ianal but I expect this admission also materially harms any relief Trump may seek on appeal…

Hard to claim it’s a witch hunt when you admit guilt of the accused fraud under oath.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It proves the element of intent for the remaining six charges, including conspiracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hunter neither holds nor is seeking public office, so who cares?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Stable genius strikes again.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 522K

    Comments