55 points

oh boy more domestic terrorism, i wonder if it’s a right winger aaaaaaaaagaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaain

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Yeah, but you gotta love that these people are so stupid they think they can just walk into federal buildings with a rifle as if they were the entire mob of January 6th insurrectionists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Nah, has to be BLaMtifa. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

When can we add conservatives to the terrorist watch list?

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

Just as SCOTUS was deciding a gun case across the street

permalink
report
reply
9 points

The fact that they keep getting away with this means it’s already over

permalink
report
reply
-18 points

It’s always interesting that there is a right to bear arms but not here or there. Maybe the only place to bear arms is in the closet.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Based on pics it looks like a rifle that’s not legal in DC due to it having too many features, and probably the named/clone ban.

Being from Atlanta I presume the fellow did not take the 16 hour class to put in for a DC carry permit, which doesn’t let you open carry or carry on the mall.

That’s a felony for the firearm, carrying it, one for each bullet, and each magazine over 10 rounds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Tell that to the founders who were quite fine with them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You can see my reply to SeaJ which gives more context I think.

The area this person was in is already an area where your rights are severely curtailed. You can be searched at any time, for instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Hopefully not in the classroom closet where all the children are hiding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, you certainly aren’t going to be bothered by the police for an hour or two if it means they might get hurt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The best place for bear arms is on a bear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Or against a bear. You won’t win that fight without a gun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Probably won’t win that fight with one either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bear mace has been shown time and time again to be more effective and safer for yourself and the bear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Same reason you can yell fire in the middle of a field but not in a movie theater.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s actually not true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Semantics. You’re allowed to yell fire if there is a fire, for example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded_theater

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

Schenck v. United States in 1919, which held that the defendant’s speech in opposition to the draft during World War I was not protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).

The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not 1-to-1, but yes, it’s already a limited-rights area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Maybe not on a field either if it’s a soccer pitch midgame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 392K

    Comments