1 point

The president should have nothing except an unofficial advisory role, at best, about any strike unless it is a total war situation. It is not a proscribed power.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I don’t think Biden will intervene in this case. It’s one company that’s going on strike, not a whole system of transportation. The economic impact will be significant but limited, as there are others that will pick up what slack they can.

Of course, this means that to preserve the right to strike we need to break companies up so they’re not too big to fail.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I can tell you right now no can pick up the slack fedex maybe can take an extra 600k in the their system. Put it in perspective that’s the normal for the memphis night sort. It going to be very ugly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

If they do interfere I hope the Teamsters go full Teamster on the government.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Why would they? They’re a private company, the government has absolutely zero business interfering in a labor dispute with private companies, unless of course they want to acknowledge that they do have power over private businesses like these to regulate them. In which case they should fucking nationalize them and throw the execute board in jail.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

They interfered when the rail workers went on strike, why wouldn’t they interfere with UPS? They’re both logistics corporations, and the whole point with the rail strike interference was to keep goods moving to where they need to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

You mean like when they intervened when the rail workers tried to go on strike?

https://inthesetimes.com/article/biden-rail-workers-strike-bernie-sanders-congress-paid-leave

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yup, they should have nationalized those assholes for continuing to drive railroads into the ground. They’re run by bsolute total incompetents

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah I think the outcome and follow up from the administration should definitely be noted with the rail workers situation.

Conservatives fight against progress at every possible turn and we blame everyone else for not getting past the roadblocks those fuckers have put up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

They better not intervene m, unless they’re going to compel UPS to meet the union’s demands

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Nah just like they did with the railroad workers dispute. They will side with the corporate boards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They kept working on it. Railroad workers got paid sick leave 6 weeks ago.

Biden was trying to appease corpos, he was trying not to have inflation explode and kick of a recession. Restricted supply was one of the big drivers of inflation, and more of that had every economist freaked out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

and more of that had every economist freaked out.

And? It isn’t like economics is a science or that economists are on our side. Almost all of them pushed for and apologize for the bailouts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I hope they strike anyway. I’m tired of this shit. Corporations are never held accountable

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

LOL if UPS drivers strike I hope fedEx drivers join them and I hope the USPS does too

it’s torches and pitchforks for everyone lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Me too!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 412K

    Comments