36 points
*

Saw this in a news article: The monthly principal payments on a $1M note at 3% is equal to the monthly payments of a $500,000 note at 9%.

So a 6% jump in interest rate effectively halves your buying power. Of course people aren’t going to sell their houses if they don’t have to.

Edit: got my percentages 1 point off.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

which is precisely what needs to happen to bring housing costs down.

3% mortgages vastly inflated home prices. the people who bought at the top of the market should be feeling the hurt just like they did in 2008.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

2008 saw the unprecedented approval of loans, but also there were a LOT of adjustable or variable rate mortgages. So as rates increased sharply, people all of a sudden were deep under water. At least here they still have low rates. even if it is on a higher priced house, their payments won’t be getting worse.

But yes housing prices are out of control. People are starting to feel it, and it could very quickly go wrong for people. People even have crazy high loans on used cars. Going to be very interesting how it plays out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i rent an affordable apartment and have a paid off car.

3/4 people i have met in the past 5 years thinks I’m crazy for not being leveraged up the wazoo like they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The monthly principal payments on a $1M note at 3% is equal to the monthly payments of a $500,000 note at 8%.

Running the numbers through an online mortgage calculator, I’m not seeing it quite that bad. Though, there are more variables than just the interest rate which need to be considered. I’m using the calculator at:
https://www.bankrate.com/mortgages/mortgage-calculator/
for those who want to follow along.

A $1,000,000 mortgage at 3% over 30 years, with no down payment has a Principal and Interest payment of $4,216
A $500,000 mortgage at 8% over 30 years with no down payment has a Principal and Interest payment of $3,668

So, not equal. If we assume a 20% down payment for each loan, leaving all other variables unchanged, we get $3,372 and $2,935 respectively. If we assume a constant $100,000 down payment (10% of the $1M mortgage and 20% of the $500k mortgage), the numbers are $3,794 and $2,935 respectively (there was no change for the $500k loan).

Overall, the claim seems to be incorrect. That said, if you look at the $500k loan, with a 20% down payment and drop the interest rate from 8% to 3%, the monthly payment drops from $2,935 to $1,686 and the total cost of the loan drops from $1,056,687 to $607,202, a rather significant drop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Using basic mathematics isn’t allowed in housing market discussion.

the only acceptable position is that mortgage rates must be forever low, so housing values can continue to rise!

anything else is unacceptable!

housing values can never fall! it’s not allowed!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I miscalculated at 9% which is $4,023. Which is within $200 of the value. Regardless though my statement still stands. 6 interest points yields almost a 50% cut in buying power. Any of the other levers can tweak it but the core of the premise remains the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

In a clash of opposing forces, the U.S. housing market finds itself embroiled in a fierce battle. On one side, deteriorated affordability resulting from a spike in mortgage rates from 3% to over 6% in 2022, just after national home prices surged by more than 40% during the Pandemic Housing Boom, is exerting downward pressure on home prices. On the other side, the scarcity of existing inventory, exacerbated by the “lock-in effect,” as many homeowners are reluctant to sell and buy anew, fearing the tradeoff from a 2% or 3% mortgage rate to one in the 6% to 7% range, is exerting upward pressure on home prices.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

I feel like there’s also a “locked out” effect… As in I’m locked out of the housing market entirely now. It’s insanely frustrating as I was just working on a promotion that would leave me comfortably affording the cheaper houses, then covid screwed everything… Now I’d be paycheck to paycheck in a dilapidated shithole in the worst parts of the worst towns around and the way housing seems to work, it’s just infinite growth forever so it’s never going back down…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is going to have an interesting effect on the labor market. With people being ‘locked-in’ it will ultimately reduce worker mobility. Combine with the emphasis on ‘back to the office’, this will reduce the labor pool available to employers.

The good news is that new build costs are coming down and builders are starting to ramp up again.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

History has shown the working middle class owning a home is good for the economy because of upward mobility. I think you have it spot on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Settle down mate. This is all far too complex and there are all together too many words up in your shit.

It’s far simpler to just blame AirBnB like we usually do.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

History has shown the working middle class owning a home is good for the economy because of upward mobility.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments