https://yewtu.be/watch?v=UiQzvCU_ygM&

Communism is some GOOD SHIT

Capitalism is the Benzodiazepines of the masses

permalink
report
reply

benzodiazepines is the carnivore diet of the masses

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points
*

Communism is psilocybin. It grows from humble places. It brings out hard truths through intense dialogue and self-examination. It gives the ability to see patterns in things.

permalink
report
reply

And sometimes it makes you panic because you see how sinister the ordinary world can be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

From shrooms or communism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean, that’s just a bad trip

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

- You heard the man! Get as much of that communism meth in you as fast as possible, tonight you’re going to have the mother of all highs… And you’re going to do it with COMMUNISM!

permalink
report
reply

Nevertheless, another reading can be made of Marx. The often cited phrase–“religion is the opium of the people”–is truncated. What follows this remark lets it be understood that human beings need opium, because they are metaphysical animals who cannot avoid asking themselves questions about the meaning of life. They give what answers they can, either adopting those offered by religion or inventing new ones, or else they avoid worrying about them.

You know, he could have bothered to actually read Marx before saying dumb shit.

The full quote from Marx, in context, is:

Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.

The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Also what comes immediately before:

For Germany, the criticism of religion has been essentially completed, and the criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism.

The profane existence of error is compromised as soon as its heavenly oratio pro aris et focis [“speech for the altars and hearths,” i.e., for God and country] has been refuted. Man, who has found only the reflection of himself in the fantastic reality of heaven, where he sought a superman, will no longer feel disposed to find the mere appearance of himself, the non-man [Unmensch], where he seeks and must seek his true reality.

The foundation of irreligious criticism is: Man makes religion, religion does not make man. Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world.

You see Peterson cannot elaborate on this because he’s a religious person who hates modernity, so this short circuits his entire belief system and ideology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I doubt he even read it at all. Didn’t he once got owned in a debate by Zizek and it came out he barely skimmed though Manifesto and that was all about marxism he ever had read?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Why bother reading when your hordes of impressionable twitter followers aren’t going to read either? He gets paid either way.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Free adderall for everyone so we meet the five year plan!

permalink
report
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.5K

    Posts

  • 94K

    Comments