I’ve never used one but it struck me as odd that people would use a seperate device for smth so easily done on your phone.

Is there smth special about the hardware? Is it better somehow?

2 points
*

The main lure of Kindle or any other e-link device is its screen. E-Link, unlike your standard LED/OLED screens on your phone/computer/tablets has lightbulbs pointed DOWN, there’s a mirror that reflects the lgiht back up, because of this, the light that hits your eyes are much weaker and thus cause less strains (I would imagine Paperwhite and Voyage are worse with eye strains than Keyboard as Keyboard does not have lights). (This actually applies to the LED Kindles, such as Paperwhite and on, rather than the general e-link display)

I have Kindle KB, Kindle Paperwhite and the Kindle Voyage, aside from KB where the battery is dead, both Paperwhite and Voyage are still in service and it is my best purchase to date.

That said, there are still times when I miss the weight of physical book on my hand, so I still borrow physical books from libraries and purchase physical books. Through the years I saw many arguments that tends to pose this “problem” as “either/or” situations, as if having one format is a distain for the other. That is simply not true, I devour ebooks, breathe physical books and seek articles on my computer.

As to why have a dedicated device for one purpose? Because it is the best at what it does. Phone/tablet computers possess too much distractions, even unprovoked I’m bombarded with notification popups. Kindle, just read. No distractions.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Your description of the technology is not quite correct.

E-ink / electronic paper

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Thank you, I knew I was missing something, I was thinking of this when I replied it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s a nice graphic!

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

E-ink screens are amazing, they looks very different to normal displays, they actually look almost like paper, and does not strain you eyes like a phone or computer display.

After understanding that the rest is easy, an ebook reader is small, lightweight, has a battery life of several weeks of active use, and can hold vast ammounts of books.

Books are awesome, but ebooks are more conveniet in the modern world.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My Kindle is more than 10 years old, one of the ones with physical buttons to turn the Pages. No crappy software/spyware, enough storage to hold tons of books, and one of those E ink screens that don’t shine at you. When the battery on this one finally dies I will be performing surgery on it and replacing the battery rather than buying a new one

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

Wow, this post is 5 months ago.

The whole point of kindle and other ebook readers are its screen. All smartphone/tablets shines bright backlit light to your eye and casuing eye strain (most people do it so long that they don’t tend to notice it anymore). First generation e-link screens doesn’t have light, and it tends to be more paperlike than your screen. Also unlike your smart phone/tablets, it is distraction free. The hardware specs are low and you can’t switch to chatting, surfing the web, turn on music or watch a video. Books and only books. Also, with phones, I always need to watch the battery and ebook readers can last months if not weeks on one charge (depends on how much you use it).

Newer readers (like for the last decade), all have frontlit screens, which is unlike the backlit smart devices. Light shines from the top to the bottom, through layers of screen and reflected back at the bottom, thus diminishing its effect and lessen eye strain. Ebook readers strives to achieve the quality of reading on paper with the ease of taking it everywhere (try log around a doorstopper around for few days.

permalink
report
reply

That’s a cool explanation, thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

In essence, ebook reader try to keep reading as close to paper as possible, to avoid/lessen eye strain (front the early lightless ebook readers to newer lighted readers), with the benefit of taking it everywhere (have you tried carrying some doorstoppers around?). Though media tends to portray ebook vs paper as neither / or, while in reality you’ll see many people perfer both. I myselft purchases physical books because I love the smell of paper books, and I devour books on my kindle (I have 3, from kindle keyboard (no light), paperwhite (first gen with light) and voyage).

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

At the risk of making it sound like a cult, I didn’t understand either until I got one (although in my case, I didn’t understand why people would want one instead of an actual book, not instead of a phone).

Honestly it’s really handy. Super lightweight so I don’t get a wrist pain from holding it up at an awkward angle. Battery lasts for months so I can just pick it up and throw it in a bag for a holiday and never think about it. All of my books neatly organised. No notifications interrupting like you would end up with on a phone. Much bigger screen than a phone despite being much lighter, so more text on one page. All of that on top of the reduced eye strain, it’s a no-brainer for me.

I have one of the backlit, touchscreen ones these days and the light is useful I keep it on warm light and the dimmest possible for use at night. But I have to admit the older version with the side buttons was better than the touchscreen, I often find myself accidentally skipping pages with the newer one.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

so I can just pick it up and throw it in a bag for a holiday and never think about it.

I understand some other arguments, but I never understood this as a ‘pro e-reader’ argument. Unless you’re going on a “no-electricity available for days” kind of vacation, how is this even a factor?

I charge my phone every night while I’m sleeping, and I have my phone with me everywhere I go. So I NEVER have to think about whether I need to throw an e-reader into my bag or decide whether to grab it on my way out the door. Wherever I am, if I have time to read, my phone is already right there, so I just read it on my phone.

And as long as I’m not playing 3D video games on my phone, the battery easily lasts all day, even with the screen on while reading, so that’s never been a factor for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not much of a phone person so tend to leave it places or forget to charge it quite often. Would be annoying trying to read myself to sleep only to find out there’s like 10% battery left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Lack of notifications and other distracting apps is a big reason I prefer my ebook over reading on my phone. I have pretty bad ADHD, if what I’m reading doesn’t have me hyperfocused I’ll switch over to another app completely unconsciously.

Reading in the dark is the main reason I prefer my ebook over an actual book. It’s so easy to keep reading after my husband goes to sleep. Mine is old enough to have a power button, but they stupidly put it on the bottom edge so I frequently click it and turn my book off lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

All the things you said are true. I would like to add that along with being lightweight compared to a real book. It’s also uniform in size so no hand cramps like if were reading a big hard cover.

And the newer ones allow to read in full sunlight without any glare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s okay. After the apocalypse you won’t have electricity, but you will have as much time to read books as you like.

Unfortunately, your glasses will break and , unable to zoom in like you would on your kindle, you won’t be able to read anything.

I saw a documentary about this once. Although why the person doesn’t then just walk over to the drug store and pick up some reading glasses, I’ll never understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was the same, I didn’t really see the point of them until I tried out my sister’s eBook reader. Then I was sold!

Also, while I still prefer physical books, I can’t deny that it’s nice to just be able to carry my entire library around in a bag.

permalink
report
parent
reply

literature.cafe chat

!chat@literature.cafe

Create post

Local off topic chat for literature.cafe, any and all are welcome. For discussions of books and beyond! Please follow instance rules. Although focused for literature.cafe users, any and all are welcome!

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

Community stats

  • 9

    Monthly active users

  • 67

    Posts

  • 690

    Comments