Google decides to delete any account that has two years of inactivity. See how they decide to go about it.

I hope this doesn’t mean they will be opening up the email addresses for use after they delete/clear them

permalink
report
reply
6 points

When deleting a Google account, they warn you about your username won’t be reclaimable. So I assume this will be the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I think that would be a security nightmare, so they probably won’t (and they’ll probably be forced to not do it if they try)

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

an inactive Google account is one that has not been used for a continuous period of two years. Google defines “activity” as actions such as signing in to read or send emails, using Google Drive, watching YouTube videos, sharing photos, or downloading apps.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Oof. What do I do with all those websites referring to my other gmail account I never use… I don’t want my main gmail to receive these messages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sign into it at least once a year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That feels okay to me?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It is, though 2 years is a little short. I just got back into my very first Yahoo e-mail not long ago and that wouldn’t have been possible with a policy like this.

But, they have so many that have been stagnant for so long so I’m not really faulting them for this particular move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Microsoft killed off my pre-MS Hotmail account years back. Google’s got lots of company with the 2 years rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Signing in to what, though?

I have one account that only ever gets used via a third party email client. When I check my email, am I “signing in” by Google’s definition or not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Yes, your 3rd party email client uses your username and password to SIGN IN, which constitutes as signing in for Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Are you sure? I’ve had accounts before where only signing in to the official web UI or client counted (because that’s where they showed ads and grabbed telemetry).

So while WE would consider using third party clients to be signing in, THEY may define it differently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I thought they had already done it. I got the notification months ago.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

yes, they did, but the actual pruning starts from december.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ah that explains it. Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

It’s not the first time. Besides, they won’t even let you log into old accounts that don’t have recovery emails and real names set. I lost a couple of really good usernames from the beta era after they rolled out all of their account protection practices. A password isn’t good enough for Google.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

They’ve got a “real names” rule?

They haven’t applied it against the online pseudonyms I’ve been using for the past 30 years. Thankfully.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They wouldn’t let me log into a couple of accounts despite having the password, saying that I hadn’t used it for awhile and they couldn’t verify I was the account owner. Since there was no recovery email set, which was intentional because it was supposed to be an anonymous account, and none of the other information I set was real, they said they can’t verify me and won’t let me log in. They’re pretty insistent that passwords alone aren’t acceptable, even when you use all of your real information. Go try to log into Google on a new device from a new location and see what a huge PITA it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ah; that explains it; I have multiple accounts cross-linked as recovery accounts. Sounds like I’ll be fine as long as I don’t run afoul of their “inactive” rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They can leverage these terms if they want to. For example you’re also only allowed to have one account per person.

Wasn’t it the Terraria dev who got his account locked and they used that as an excuse as to why he was locked out of his account? They said he had too many accounts or something?

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/02/terraria-developer-cancels-google-stadia-port-after-youtube-account-ban/

They can enforce arbitrary rules when they need to if they wanna fuck you over; just like cops.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I do only have one account with them now. They’re a terrible platform these days if you want an anonymous spam account. They were good back in the day because they offered 10x the storage as everyone else, and we hadn’t fully comprehended the scope of their snooping. My only email address with them now is used as a corporate spam address, since it’s completely overrun with spam anyways, after 20+ years of use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Stop threatening me with a good time.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 78K

    Comments