69 points

A PhD is not the only way to expand human knowledge. This is disregarding a lot of work done by a lot of hard working people.

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

Yes but how will I feel good that I spent 140k on a piece of paper if I don’t brag about it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Imagine having to pay for education

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’ve been making six figures while getting my PhD. There are plenty of opportunities to get your PhD funded if you are a US citizen. There are plenty more valid places to poke fun at pursuing a PhD but it is very common to have funding and thus no debt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

wtf kind of university are you studying at? We get minimum wage here

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

most PhDs are paid a salary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

As their specialised knowledge reaches the edge of the circle, their general knowledge updating should retract.

Everyone has met a PhD that is almost entirely clueless in other areas. Not their fault though, don’t get me wrong.

Edit: The person that downvoted must be Dr. Climate Change Denier. Dr. Covid Denier has joined the fray.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s funny but you see the same thing in sports, or I see it specifically in hockey. Phenom kid gets drafted and at 18 has the social skills of the hockey puck he’s playing with. By the time he’s 36 he’s not the player he once was but is a more well rounded individual with age and experience. When you focus all your energy to become the best at something, like a PhD, athlete, musician, whatever, you sacrifice some things along the way for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I feel so called out. I’m alright in my field but completely clueless outside of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

When u look at most people I feel like the trending alternative at 18-50 y is personality of a hockey puck and also skills of a hockey puck, with the reasoning ability of the hockey puck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s not universally true. I know several people with PhD who have encyclopedic knowledge completely outside their specialisation. Some people are just super intelligent, talented and have enormous memory. The world is not fair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Good luck expanding the fields of math and science without a PhD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Like the guy who found this somehow important new shape not to long ago? I don’t think he has a PhD. But he did contribute. Not saying that it’s easy though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have no idea what you’re talking about, but I expected someone to bring up some shit like that. My point still stands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t think it’s meant to do that. Also if we substitute PhD for learning both will be true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

You might be surprised to learn it doesn’t actually suggest a PhD is the only way to expand human knowledge. No one was disregarded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

No one says it was the only way? But one of the requirements of getting that PhD is to expand knowledge so it’s 100% applicable

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Presumably you could meet the boundary with “a dollah fifty in late fees at the public library” and find a way to push through from there. You’d have to find a way to publish or share your new knowledge. Studying at uni gives you access to experts in their own thing that likely have knowledge that could help you with your thing as well as a system designed to churn out these papers when you eventually find your thing.

Every day people discover new things but it takes attention, effort, and will to PROVE it’s a new thing and more yet to share that with the world. Too bad you can’t get an honorary PhD for doing that, at least not reliably.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Wait, how bad are bachelors’ degrees in the US/anglosphere? I was contirbuting to research projects and had a specialization by the time I was done with my five year bachelors’ equivalent.

In fairness, I think the system has since been reformatted so that the fifth year is now a (paid for) master’s, but still. That graph makes it seem like it’s high school with benefits.

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

College is what you put into it. A lot of people don’t get into the networking side of it because it’s never really introduced to them. Mostly professors look for those who are “turned on” to bring onto projects like that, that is, those that are engaged and asking questions and curious.

Youngins, lpt: talk to your professors and let them know you are interested and ask questions. It’s what you are there for- access to brains.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, not really over here. You do have to do a bunch of hands-on stuff for credits. Can’t even replace those with more standard subjects.

You can absolutely wing it past all five years, depending on your degree, but between mandatory projects and internships you have to try really hard to not get some level of expertise in the field.

Plus, university curriculums have specializations here, so you get mandatory courses on pretty narrow subjects whether you like it or not. So… I guess there are some differences, maybe? I was pissed when they announced they’d do that masters’ thing here because the price of tuition for that year goes from being a couple hundred to a few thousand for basically the same curriculum, but this is definitely not the first time I notice that the anglosphere assumes there’s a huge difference between the two things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The UK system is a bit better about those kinds of things, courses tend to be modular with required internships etc. The American system is a lot different and scheduled like high school, but that may have changed since I was in it. It really was dependent on the course, though. I like the UK setup much better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can do a bachelor’s in college? Not here. College is typically only two year programs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

College and university are relatively interchangable colloquially in American English. Associate’s Degrees are 2 years. Colleges in Europe etc. are different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It depends on the course. For my course, the bachelor’s year included a project that was more design based, while the master’s year had a project that was research based, however I ended up working with a PhD student assisting in his research project for my bachelor’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It definitely sounds that our system was a bit more standardized than that, which checks out and is both a strenght and a weakness depending on how you look at it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

five year bachelors’ equivalent

In Germany (and Europe, I believe, since the Bologna reforms), a bachelor’s is (usually) 3 years and a master’s is 5 years. That might be why you got to do research and I didn’t. How long are your master’s courses?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

One year, typically. Some could be two or have a big chunk of on-the-job training/internship.

We used to have a more prominent 3 year degree, but it went semi-extinct in favor of other intermediate education, leaving our Bachelor’s equivalent being 4-5 years, depending on which degree you’re going for. And yeah, I think now they made them all 4 year and have more of a master’s offering.

The thing is that internationally those 4-5 year degrees are still the thing immediately under a masters’ degree, so there is a bit of a mismatch there. That goes some ways towards clarifying that, thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

I kind of hate this image. Its like a way to discredit all the learning done in the formative elementary/high school years. If I would guess, 60-70% of everything I have learned was in high school and thats with me having several published papers.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Why do you think it discredis it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

To be fair, most of “all human knowledge” is stuff like when the last time was that each person on the planet pooped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I would read that paper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Go make your little bump in the circle of human knowledge then!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

For your paper, I’m pooping right now. You can add that to your data points

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nobody knows when I pooped last. It was some time today, but I don’t remember when, and no one else ever knew.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You only THINK we don’t know

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Right, but the image says it’s a small part of all of human knowledge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is the exact same concept that hentai artists use because they don’t know how women’s anatomy works

permalink
report
reply
52 points

Frustrating to say the least. I feel my PhD accelerated learning in all directions. Not from the program content itself, but the skills involved in the ingestion of high volumes of dense information. This idea that the borders of my world don’t extend past some yadda yadda about some tiny subclass of a field is some silly goosery.

Can those “skills involved” be learned elsewhere? Sure, this is just the path I took. Can phDoctors be single minded or general idiots? Sure, I’m an idiot. Do we need some single minded people? Sure, amazing things can be accomplished by singular focus.

But it isn’t a mandatory condition or experience of a floppy hat assed (sword in some countries) recipient of this degree.

permalink
report
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 84K

    Comments