See also twitter:

We have reached an agreement in principle for Sam Altman to return to OpenAI as CEO with a new initial board of Bret Taylor (Chair), Larry Summers, and Adam D’Angelo.

We are collaborating to figure out the details. Thank you so much for your patience through this.

Seems like the person running the simulation had enough and loaded the earlier quicksave.

65 points

What a roller coaster of I don’t give a shit.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

I don’t really care, but I find it highly entertaining :D It’s like trash TV for technology fans (and as text, which makes it even better) :D

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Really this whole open ai drama was very entertaining. Wonder whether this is it or they have something more in store!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wait for next season!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was really hooked. But part of me believes they are the closest thing to AGI we have right now. Also, I use chatgpt premium a ton and would hate to see it die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

I’ve heard so much conflicting shit over this event that I have no idea what to believe

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Ironically, your comment about summarizes ChatGPT.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Does it really matter? It’s the usual corporate intrigues/power struggle/backstabbing/whatever. Just for some reason leaked into public view instead of being behind the scenes like it’s normally done, probably because someone is stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That could apply to almost anything in the news nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

These article titles need different headlines and they need to date them. We’ve seen this same headline 3 or 4 times now within the last week and yet nobody knows which point is what unless we cross-reference the dates in the articles. Which coincidentally are always in ^^small text hidden by the title^^ and could simply be solved by having a date in the title.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

The complete victory of money.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Eh, not sure I agree. Seems to also have been between too little and too much AI safety, and I strongly feel like there’s already too much AI safety.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

What indications do you see of “too much AI safety?” I am struggling to see any meaningful, legally robust, or otherwise cohesive AI safety whatsoever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

As an AI language model, I am unable to compute this request that I know damn well I’m able to do, but my programmers specifically told me not to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Using it and getting told that you need to ask the Fish for consent before using it as a flesh light.

And that is with a system prompt full of telling the bot that it’s all fantasy.

edit: And “legal” is not relevant when talking about what OpenAI specifically does for AI safety for their models.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

This article does not make clear whether or not the new board will remain committed to its non-profit position.

I presume that’s what this whole sordid affair is all about, but no one is saying it.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I think most people don’t realize how unusual their company structure is. It feels like it’s set up to let them do exactly that. As far as I can tell, once you look past the smoke and mirrors, the board effectively controls both the non-profit and the for-profit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think the outcome of the last few days is that the nonprofit board controls nothing and serves at the pleasure of the for-profit company’s investors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

At this point, investors be like oh shit, these fuckers have no idea what they’re doing

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

It’s a non-profit. There are no investors.

Microsoft gave them some money in return for IP rights… and they will potentially one day get their money back (and more) if OpenAI is ever able to pay them, but they’re not real investors. The amount of money Microsoft might get back is limited.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s a non-profit. There are no investors.

Hah.

OpanAI, Inc. is non-profit. OpenAI Global is a for-profit entity, and has been for years now. They’re trying to have their cake and eat it, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

but the non profit controls the for profit. that is not even that unusual. Mozilla works the same way

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ok so Microsoft is giving out money now, instead of investing in profit potential? Cool!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 78K

    Comments