North Korea’s defence minister has warned the United States that the deployment of nuclear assets in South Korea could meet the conditions for its use of nuclear arms, according to state media.

Kang Sun Nam’s comments, reported on Thursday by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), came in response to the US sending a submarine with nuclear-armed ballistic missiles to South Korea this week for the first time in decades.

“The ever-increasing visibility of the deployment of the strategic nuclear submarine and other strategic assets may fall under the conditions of the use of nuclear weapons specified in the DPRK law,” Kang said in a statement, referring to his country by its official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

Tensions between the US and North Korea have been on the rise in recent weeks with Pyongyang increasing its ballistic missile testing in defiance of Washington and international sanctions.

Late last week, the US, South Korea and Japan released a joint statement condemning the launch of a North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile days earlier.

“The United States reiterated that its commitments to defend the ROK [Republic of Korea, or South Korea] and Japan are ironclad and backed by the full range of capabilities, including nuclear,” the statement said.

The three allies went on to hold a joint military drill on Sunday.

On Wednesday, South Korea and Japan reported that North Korea had launched two more ballistic missiles.

The US and South Korea also held their first so-called Nuclear Consultative Group meeting this week. The White House said it provided a chance for the US to reaffirm its commitment to provide “extended deterrence” to South Korea.

“Any nuclear attack by North Korea against the United States or its allies is unacceptable and will result in the end of that regime, and the US and ROK sides highlighted that any nuclear attack by the DPRK against the ROK will be met with a swift, overwhelming, and decisive response,” the White House said in a statement after the talks.

On Thursday, North Korea slammed the nuclear meeting. “The phase of a military clash on the Korean Peninsula has surfaced as a dangerous reality,” the KCNA report said.

24 points

Do they need food aid again?

permalink
report
reply
-1 points
*

Do we need nukes in every country on earth?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

No?

I’m not sure how this is a proper response to my comment.

North Korea is known for creating conflict to obtain food aid for their citizens (captives).

I was asking if this was the case again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“The United States reiterated that its commitments to defend the ROK [Republic of Korea, or South Korea] and Japan are ironclad and backed by the full range of capabilities, including nuclear,” the statement said.

nukes launched that close to China would mean WW3

permalink
report
reply
1 point

At least we could all collectively stop worrying about the climate stuff, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nah, I’d rather keep on living for as long as I can

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I bet there is at least a 4% chance you would be in the group that wishes they had died in the initial blasts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

When are we going stop fucking around with North Korea and just flat out stomp that dictatorship to dust?

Sick of the threats time to end the bullshit before they do just that and use a nuke.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

The US tried that, it was called the Korean War. China got involved and it got messy. China still doesn’t want a US ally on their border, so they would likely get involved again if conflict did resume. Given they have nuclear capability well beyond Nork’s, see how that’s a problem?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Laughs in geopolitical alliances

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

When are we going stop fucking around with North Korea and just flat out stomp that dictatorship to dust?

Think this through. The population under the Kim regime is severely impoverished with few skills, little arable land, and nearly nonexistent health care for its population. It borders both China and Russia.

You’re proposing we take out the Kim regime. Okay, lets say that’s done. Now what? You broke the country with you deposing the leadership. Now you’re the leadership. Be prepared to take on 40-100 years of rebuilding an entire country where it doesn’t have the resources to do that all the while boarding the other countries in the world in the top 3 of “most number of nuclear weapons”.

Oh, don’t forget to bring you wallet. You’re going to be paying for ALL of it for 100 years in cash
or you can mostly ignore them and throw some bags of food at them to shut them up now and then. Which do you chose to do, World Leader?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I mean Germany did it. I think S Korea could handle it. Russia and china wouldn’t like US bases on their borders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If we glass them Russia or China might pop off. That’s curtains for the human race. One man with a 308 is a better solution, but we don’t do that sort of thing, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments