At least 10 of the Israeli civilians released by Hamas, both men and women, were sexually assaulted or abused while in captivity, the Associated Press reported Wednesday.

In a report detailing allegations of severe and widespread sexual abuse by Hamas terrorists during their October 7 onslaught and later against hostages, a doctor who treated some of the 110 hostages released from captivity told the AP that at least 10 men and women among those freed were sexually assaulted or abused.

Original AP article that reports this where it’s buried in the last section right before the end of the article.

49 points

The only people who are suffering are the civilians who don’t give a shit about this holy-land-grab-war, and are dying because two insane factions are being sold weapons.

permalink
report
reply
50 points
*

These two were sitting right next to each other this morning:

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

”The common people pray for rain, healthy children, and a summer that never ends," Ser Jorah told her. “It is no matter to them if the high lords play their game of thrones, so long as they are left in peace.” He gave a shrug. "They never are.”

Life imitates art, sadly

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

More like JRRM captured a fundamental reality

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

JRRM? Is this a gif joke?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah that’s fair. Good art holds up a mirror in our faces.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I wish this were true - that most people don’t care about this and just want peace - but I think evidence is continuing to show that the reality is a bit messier. Here’s some recent polling data from Gaza and the West Bank (though it should be strongly noted that polling in these places is very hard)

https://www.awrad.org/files/server/polls/polls2023/Public%20Opinion%20Poll%20-%20Gaza%20War%202023.pdf

the majority of (59%) strongly supported or (16%) supported to some extent the October 7 attacks carried by the Hamas-led factions, while 16% supported to some extent [sic]. 11% reported that they neither supported nor opposed the attack, while 13% expressed opposition to the attacks. Strong support for the attacks was notably higher among Palestinians in the West Bank (68%) as compared to Gaza (47%).

The most positively appraised of all actors were the Al Qassam Brigades, Islamic Jihad, Al Aqsa Brigades, and Hamas.

It does feel disturbing to me that such a small number of Palestinians looked at the October 7th massacres and felt that they were wrong. It’s tempting to believe that most people abhor violence and support non-violent paths towards peace, but I don’t think the evidence really shows that.

I don’t know what polling looks like in Israel, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s equally depressing. I think the main takeaway is that no one is really interested in moving towards peace.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sharing images of the polling for more context:

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Thanks for that. Looking again, there’s one interesting stat there that I missed the first time, that only 14% support a Hamas-led government after the war, while most support a coalition with the Palestinian Authority. The PA is largely useless, but what they are not is terrorists, so that’s a small hopeful sign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Interesting stats 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If the two countries had parity and equality, that polling would suggest that the Palestinian citizens are awful.

But I’m our reality where Palestine is an open air person where the majority of people are children because the life expectancy is so poor, that kinda changes things, doesn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

I’d personally say no. Perhaps this is a privileged mindset, but I don’t think there are any circumstances that justify the intentional murder, torture, and rape of random civilians.

I can certainly understand how that mindset would evolve given the circumstances - living your whole life oppressed by a foreign government with no real opportunities could easily lead you to dehumanize anyone associated with that nation - but it doesn’t excuse it. I’m sure plenty of Jews after the Holocaust wanted to murder every German they saw, and again, while I would understand that mindset, it wouldn’t excuse the behavior.

And even on a pragmatic level, devolving down into our baser instincts just means that whoever has the most guns wins, and that certainly isn’t the Palestinians. Whether it’s just or not - and I’d generally say it’s not - there exists no path of violent resistance that leads to an independent thriving Palestine, no matter or fair or unfair one might think that is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

If I put a gun to your head, you’ll “poll” however I want you to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The pollster is an Palestinian group based in Ramallah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
0 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
-17 points

Hamas and IDF are one and the same.

permalink
report
reply
-6 points
*

I’d love to see your evidence that the IDF regularly employs sexual abuse as a tactic. I’ll wait.

Edit: I’m interpreting each downvote as an admission that you couldn’t find evidence, but I’d love to be proven wrong! We do care about facts and the truth here, no?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Does this count? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67581915 https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/un-rights-office-seriously-concerned-about-israels-increased-arrest-palestinians-2023-12-01/

It obviously isn’t necessarily a battlefield tactic but I don’t care. No one with an adult’s understanding of the world who has condemned Israel’s response didn’t also condemn Hamas after Oct 7. This war is not Hamas v. Israel to most people. It’s far right nationalists fighting each other again and again v. Civilians trying to live there lives.

Hamas and Likud/settlers should go out to some empty desert somewhere and kill each other there so normal, sane people can work towards peace.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

No one with an adult’s understanding of the world who has condemned Israel’s response didn’t also condemn Hamas after Oct 7.

This doesn’t appear to actually be true, unless you mean to imply that a majority of Palestinians don’t have an adult’s understanding of the word. Don’t get me wrong though, this in no ways provides just cause to target civilians.

https://www.awrad.org/files/server/polls/polls2023/Public%20Opinion%20Poll%20-%20Gaza%20War%202023.pdf

The majority of (59%) strongly supported or (16%) supported to some extent the October 7 attacks carried by the Hamas-led factions, while 16% supported to some extent [sic]. 11% reported that they neither supported nor opposed the attack, while 13% expressed opposition to the attacks. Strong support for the attacks was notably higher among Palestinians in the West Bank (68%) as compared to Gaza (47%).

That said, I’m not surprised conditions in Israeli prisons are very poor, though they’re unfortunately not remotely alone in the global context in that. It’s also worth noting that the Israel Prison Service is independent from the IDF and operates under a completely different ministry. I’m not saying that it’s not horrendous, because it is, but it doesn’t rise to the same severity in my mind. I do genuinely appreciate you providing an actual source though; I certainly don’t think Israel is any angel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The IDF’s chief Rabbi literally issued a statement directing soldiers to do it but ok bub

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In 2002, which he then retracted.

He is a piece of shit, to be clear, but his words also have exactly zero legal relevance in the IDF, so, while certainly objectionable, that isn’t what I actually asked for, which was evidence the IDF actually regularly performs sexual violence.

I’m sure Hamas’ religious authorities aren’t exactly spreading love love peace peace either, not that that matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The propaganda teams on here are pretty prolific. There’s about 10 accounts that brigade anything not worshipping Hamas.

You’ll find once actual people see your comments it will creep back up

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
2 points

That is sickening, but I’d point you to what’s right below that headline.

The army has removed the commanding officer of the unit and opened an investigation

So some asshole commander committed atrocities and is facing consequences for it, because this is not an accepted practice in the IDF, which was the claim I’m asking for evidence of. Do you think Hamas officials punished anyone involved in the October 7th attacks who committed sexual assault or attacked civilians?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Why are you only asking for evidence about the IDF?

All I’ve seen were testimonies from Israelis about Hamas. History has shown that Israelis have no problem lying to make their enemies look bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because the parent comment explicitly mentioned the IDF?

If you’re going to discard any evidence coming from Israelis, you’re not actually open to any evidence that might challenge your views at all. Which is fine, but don’t pretend to be looking for a rational discussion then.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 283K

    Comments