9 points

Line goes up, so the Amerikkkan economic system is still working as intended. Ignore the other line, just look at the upward line. The only important line. /j

permalink
report
reply
12 points

how did they categorise the middle class

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

Center 60% of the middle income earners, is the standard definition

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Put another way: 3.5 million people control more wealth than 210 million people. Each individual of those 3.5 million owns as much as 60 “middle classers” combined.

Lastly, according to this graphic, the top 1% and 60% of middle income earners account for only ~51% of the nation’s wealth? There’s no way the bottom 39% control 49% of the wealth, so where tf is it? Something’s fucky

permalink
report
reply

They defined middle class as the top 80% that are not in the top 20%, not “60% of middle income earners”.

I’m guessing your missing wealth is in the top 20% that aren’t in the top 1%

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Ah ok, so top income earners from 2-19% would account for that 39%. Seems right.

https://youtu.be/QPKKQnijnsM?si=uX5nOhWhyStz7VaB this is my basis for comparison. Still one of the best “income inequality explained” videos of all time

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Wtf is this “middle class” anyway? How do you define it? And where is the line?

The classes I learned from my schools and university is simpler: If you work, you are the worker. If you exploit the worker, you are a capitalist.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Right, middle class is a nebulous idea that doesn’t really have much meaning behind it. I agree that class membership derives its meaning from the relations in society. If majority of the income comes from the capital the individual owns then they’re a member of the capitalist class, and if majority of their income comes from their labour then they’re a member of the working class. These two classes have contradictory interests since capital owners act as employers of the workers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

We never learned about classes in school. My son was taught explicitly that the US was not a class society. Class is a vibe.

Shorthand for middle class is whether someone owns or could “own” a house

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

We never learned about classes either. We did learn about consumer segments, what papers they read and what brands of cigarettes they smoked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Right, its interesting because a class (by this definition) is an affectation. Its a brand identity, it is a level of access that you can aspire to (or lose.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

What two red scares and a cold war does to a curriculum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

“earners from between the 20th and 80th percentile”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I wonder if this correlates with the wealth of the 1% in pre-revolutionary China and Russia? 🤔

permalink
report
reply

US News

!us_news@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

Community stats

  • 436

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 6.2K

    Comments

Community moderators