The Seattle Children’s Hospital filed a lawsuit in Travis County District Court on Dec. 7 against the Texas Office of the Attorney General (OAG), after that agency requested documents related to gender transition policies and any such care provided to Texas children.

111 points

Why in the Kentucky fried fuck is Texas asking Seattle about that.

permalink
report
reply
107 points

We all know why. I’m just surprised the hospital responded with a lawsuit instead of a “go fuck yourself.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

It does bring more attention if they drag out the go fuck yourself bit with a lawsuit but they definitely need a huge go fuck yourself with a rake letter here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I’ve got a nice rusty pitchfork they could use in a pinch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

Both demands include a notice that failure to comply could result in a misdemeanor criminal charge that would carry a $5,000 fine or jail confinement of up to a year.

It sounds like the state could imprison the hospital’s personnel if they ever traveled to Texas (or any other jurisdiction that might jail them on Texas’ behalf).

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Yeah I said that this was the inevitable outcome of RvW being overturned. It’s a matter of time now. The line of the ensuing civil war will be drawn over these state extradition agreements, and if a Republican ever gets the presidency again they will use the feds to forcibly extradite doctors to Texas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I gotta say I figured they’d use interstate extradition to bring back women who’d left for an abortion. I did not think they’d be dumb enough to try and act like their laws apply to hospital staff in other states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

We have a law in Washington which prevents healthcare providers from sharing the information that the Texas attorney general is requesting. I love my state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m reading between the lines a bit, but I think the idea is that Texas thinks SCH is providing care that violated Texas law via telemedicine. That’s why they’re asking about stuff like patients of SCH who had their labs done in Texas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Suck a dick, Texas.

permalink
report
reply
-7 points

Texas government*

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

So the people that elect the asshats that run Texas get a pass?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No, but there’s not as many of them as you might think. TX is gerrymandered to hell, voter suppression abounds, and so many people don’t think beyond the R it’s astounding. The Republicans have created an environment where they almost can’t help but stay in power. If everyone eligible to vote in TX was able to do so properly, the state would look a lot more purple. Source: born in TX & lived 2/3 of my life there before I got out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The people who elect the ass hats aren’t representative of all Texans, and they’re dying off.

Texas is becoming more and more blue every day, which is why the government is doing everything they can to suppress Democrat voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Why do they have to sue? Why do they have to respond at all? Texas isn’t Washington and not only is there no jurisdiction, there’s no standing for the courts either.

https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2023/06/24/how-washingtons-shield-law-protects-abortion-patients-coming-from-other-states/

permalink
report
reply
49 points

Because Texas threatens criminal prosecution for anyone who does not comply. And these people are probably concerned that if they just say no and don’t sue, they will most likely face criminal litigation in Texas that could cause arrest warrants that could affect them if and when they travel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Right but outside of issuing an arrest warrant in the state of Texas, what else could they do? They are not federal and have no greater authority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

So you think it’s totally fine that people just doing their fully legal job in the state they live and work in should be subjected to arrest warrants that prevent them from ever safely entering a completely different state?

“Sorry boss, I can’t go to that conference. It’s hosted in Texas and I’ll be arrested as I exit the plane.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, it would probably land in front of the Supreme Court but they could then attempt to have the hospital workers extradited to Texas. States extradite people as a routine matter but I gotta think Washington would probably refuse this time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s a whole thing about interstate extradition. The same way that Florida is obligated under federal law if NY issues an arrest warrant.

It was discussed in detail a while back when a number of Florida politicians acted like they could protect Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Also, because under Washington state law, it would be illegal for them to comply with the Texas attorney general in this case.

https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2023/06/24/how-washingtons-shield-law-protects-abortion-patients-coming-from-other-states/

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I think the Texas AG has that whole “full faith and credit” thing backwards.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

I continue to be annoyed that texas is wasting all of this time on this. Go solve real problems. Except republicans are seemingly incapable of that, so I guess this is what we get.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments