8 points

A 42 minute read to prove that someone doesn’t get correlation vs causation as well as a junior college stats class.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Paraphrasing from the comments ‘sure IQ values are bad, but they are the best measures of IQ we have’ Oof. That is pulling an battle winning argument that will lose you the entire war if you think about it.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

It’s also, probably wrong. Modern views of intelligence (see Multiple realizability of cognition and Multi-level competency collective intelligence and Free Energy Principle models) suggest you are better of measuring intelligence by measuring it’s metabolism or through perturbation and interactions.

Which isn’t reductive enough for these people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

In 2002, psychologist Richard Lynn and political scientist Tatu Vanhanen published their seminal book

Ah, “seminal” in the sense of “cum-bucket”

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Their methodology gave conclusive and unquestionable evidence that people with caucasoid skull shape are innately and genetically predisposed towards knowing what a “regatta” is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

tfw it is in you material interest to be hostile to any kind of sociological insight

permalink
report
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 182

    Monthly active users

  • 332

    Posts

  • 7.9K

    Comments