7 points

Content!

permalink
report
reply
-21 points

Turns out Skyrim in space doesn’t work

permalink
report
reply
36 points

It’s not though. There was way less loading screens in skyrim

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

If only we had gotten Skyrim in space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You already have it. Skyrim takes place on a planet in space.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Outer space excludes it tho. That’s like calling “Playing indoors” outdoors

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

mind=blown

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Joly Moly

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Ackshully, Mundus is a collaborative construct in the void of Oblivion, not our universe’s outer space.

God, I wish I’d dedicated that memory space to something useful in highschool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Its not though. Skyrim in space would have been cool. But Bethesda fucked it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

The real issue is that it’s not Skyrim in space. Skyrim in space would’ve been better. What we got was a hollow husk of a game. There’s no substance or charm, because it’s all procedurally generated hills and cliffs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

procedurally generated ain’t all bad, but for this game it was not the move. As soon as I heard about “100+ planets” i kinda lost hope in the game. What they should’ve done instead was make A Solar System. 8 or so planets to land in, explore, and do quests in, and go absolutely ham on those 8 planets to make them as intesting and diverse from each other as possible. The rest would be moons or space stations you’d find exploring space. IDK, this could just be me, but i feel doing this alone would have improved the game significantly

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah that sounds fun af. Procedural generation has a place, but devs need to stop assuming every game should have it. Quality over quantity.

Or to steal an argument about AI writing “if you couldn’t be bothered to make the levels, why do you think it can hold my attention in an exploration game”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s a completely different game and genre, but that’s exactly what made the space exploration Outer Wilds so great: One seamless solar system, fully handcrafted with literally zero filler content. Not even a single location. No matter what you find, it’s always meaningful and connected to other things in the game.

Of course, that doesn’t mean it’s the only way, but it really highlights the limits of procedural generation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s not the procedural generation that’s the problem.

It’s that they are building on top of a shit engine and so they only procedurally generated the landscapes and don’t procedurally generate the actual content.

So you will go to 25 different generated planets and then do the exact same output 25 different times. The exact same outpost. With the same crap in each room. The same exact layout.

The most extreme example of this ridiculousness is the temples with the exact same minigame hundreds of times on hundreds of plants in different playthroughs.

It’s not that it has procedural generation.

It’s that it doesn’t have enough of it to execute on the concept of a full and varied universe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They need to pick a direction, and they didn’t. Either commit to procedural generation and make it good, or don’t bother and make a really good Skyrim-type experience.

I don’t think Starfield devs knew which they wanted so they kinda did both… poorly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I was punished for exploring. I ended up finding something that is not useful until the scripted event allows you to make it relevant. It’s the opposite of Skyrim where you can explore so much you can end up in Blackreach.

With Starfield you should stick to the script and never explore on your own. Only explore planets the main storylines have asked you to visit and never before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
126 points

Huh, so this is what happens when you passive-aggressively diss your customers’ reviews and tell them “no, it isn’t our fault our game feels dated and like a step down from what we had before, you guys are just playing the game wrong”…

permalink
report
reply
79 points

permalink
report
reply
36 points

it’s like poetry

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What client are you using to get ads?

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

It isn’t an ad. I just linked to the store page itself and I don’t post affiliate ads and those aren’t possible on steam anyway. It’s just resolving the link and there just happens to be a sale for that garbage shaped game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

garbage shaped game.

Game shaped garbage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s bad

permalink
report
reply

Games

!games@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc…
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

Community stats

  • 6.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 74K

    Comments

Community moderators