318 points

Sir, a second sex video has been found.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

I only opened the comments to see if anyone posted this yet lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I only opened comments to see if someone had made this comment

lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I only opened comments lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Appropriate use, haha.

permalink
report
parent
reply
316 points

Bridget, you deserve to be fired from your job because you are terrible at your job, not because you had sex with a woman,

I love this so hard. Epic burn.

permalink
report
reply
241 points

permalink
report
reply
16 points

I wish I could upvote this twice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I gotchu

permalink
report
parent
reply
206 points

It’s not gay if it’s in a threeway!

Anyways, I don’t care what shenanigans this lady gets up to in private, but can she now stop using hatred as a stepladder for her shitty political career?

permalink
report
reply
71 points

Hatred is the only part of these people’s platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

It’s like a cheat code for winning over stupid people. Us social apes instinctually band together against things we feel threaten us. These douchebags just keep crying wolf, then bear, then cougar, then three headed rattlesnake, and the list goes on, and ride that fear to further their careers. A disappointingly large portion of the population never seems to notice how so many of these issues are entirely fictional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Yeah I feel weird about this one. She’s a self-hating hypocrite and she’s toxic, but attacking her sexuality is extremely not something I’m comfortable with. There is, on the other hand, an allegation that she seuxally assaulted someone, so I guess it makes sense that they’re looking for this stuff.

But maybe stop telling the press about it? Do your investigation in private and get it done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

It’s not (or shouldn’t be) about attacking her sexuality but highlighting the hypocrisy of her position. Sex sells but in principle it’s the same as if she started a group devoted to outlawing tiktok as immoral and then had her tiktok account exposed

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

but attacking her sexuality is extremely not something I’m comfortable with.

She sure is comfortable attacking anyone else’s so why is she off-limits now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Because that was always off-limits. For her and for you, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Principle

If you say you’re against punching people in the face you can’t punch someone to stop them

I guess, who knows

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

It’s the hypocrisy that I dislike so much.

If she were a shit person preaching shit ideas but living by them? I’ll still disagree but it won’t be nearly as insulting as someone saying one thing and doing another.

Do as I say not as I do very much appears to be part of the GOP these days and it seems like every huckster and whore is getting in on the grift. It doesn’t matter how you actually live your life; as long as you can tell certain people how they can live theirs that shadowy PAC money will trickle down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Pointing out her hypocrisy and making her feel bad about being a judgemental cunt is not attacking her sexuality. It’s attacking the front she’s trying to sell, don’t confuse these two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If you’re not seeing the homophobia every time one of these is posted, you’re not looking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I thought the allegation involved her husband assaulting the woman they had threesomes with. However, I haven’t made any special effort to keep track of this situation, so I could be missing something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

She used the ‘no homo’ loophole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
115 points

i haven’t even been able to find the first one yet

permalink
report
reply
87 points
*

Good and let’s hope it stays that way, because the rape victim filmed without consent is also one of the people in that video.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

gross ok. i’ll watch something else

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

And even if there was no rape victim in the video, there’s an internet full of porn out there and there’s probably already something you’ll accept as masturbatory material that was meant for the general adult population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

meant for the general adult population

meaning this one wasn’t?

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Commenting just in case there’s an update to this breaking news story

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments