283 points

How is it these laws can get passed but our legislatures can’t do anything that’s actually important for society? 

permalink
report
reply
288 points

It’s so much worse than that. North Carolina House Bill 8 was created a year ago to add Computer Science to middle school and high school curriculums. Throughout it’s 3 edits over the year, all 10 pages of the bill were about teaching kids computer science. Then, ONE WEEK before the bill was passed, a paragraph on the last page was added including the text requiring age verification for adult websites. https://www.ncleg.gov/BillLookup/2023/H8

At that point it was too late, and anyone against the bill would be called out for being against teaching kids computer science. The cowards writing these bills know that they would be shot down immediately if they were public about what they were doing, so they tack it on to a children’s education bill and hope no one notices until it’s too late.

permalink
report
parent
reply
202 points

That kind of shit should really be illegal

permalink
report
parent
reply
123 points

It is illegal where I live. I imagine it’s illegal in most developed countries. Bills can only have one purpose, they can’t combine unrelated things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Thank goodness it’s illegal in New York

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Fucking Amy Galey. I hate that I have to be I around her and pretend that she’s the best thing since sliced bread. I wish people got to hear more about her talking at length about how great her family treated their slaves and less about her GOP silly season power moves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

the politicians were the naughty ones all along

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well, why not vote against it and defend yourself when accused of voting against education?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes.” - Jonathon Swift

So now you’re investing time and effort to publicize why this bill was broken. Your political opposition successfully got you on the defensive. These strategies play a part of why fascism and authoritarianism are succeeding in the USA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Simply put, the attack is shorter and easier to understand than the nuanced defense.

Politicians can put “you’re against education!” in a 15 second attack ad on the radio/TV/a poster. It takes a short media appearance to explain the nuance. Which isn’t worth the time or money typically, since so few people will see it.

Especially since a huge section of our population gets 100% of its news from Fox, Newsmax, and other right wing media. That interview will never air there. In fact, those sources will repeat the party line of “you’re against education!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Judging from what they said, it took a year to come to fruition and a week to poison the apple. The current kindergarteners are gonna be grown and graduated by the time the red tape lets way for another vote on the matter. Why not just make bills strictly about the thing they are proposing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve always been confused about how they can legally be like “here’s a hundred page bill about this great thing, but buried at the end is this horrible thing we went to push though but no one will see it”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Well, why not vote against it and defend yourself when accused of voting against education?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t count on the average American voter to understand nuance

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Because they don’t actually give a shit about society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The legislators passing these laws are interested only in hurting people, getting bribes, and getting reelected so they can continue. Doing something important for society doesn’t even factor into their decision making.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

but like… instantly forgiving all student loans… or Forgiving all medical debt… or immediately begin building high-speed rail across the entire country spending like $10 trillion etc. to do so… like… that kind of shit - something that the most rural red state right wing fucker can’t ignore.

Hey this might help ya

https://youtu.be/OgVKvqTItto?si=u_cubR7B2h7r25Co

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
177 points
*

Republicans doing a real good job giving a peek into what voting Red will do for them this year

permalink
report
reply
42 points

The children are saved and wont see porn ever /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Voting red, not voting, or voting third party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Sad part is people will still vote for them in droves

permalink
report
parent
reply
159 points

Christian taliban

permalink
report
reply
155 points
*

Yeah bruh, I try to avoid porn. Personal decision. PERSONAL. Stay the fuck out of everyone’s goddamn lives. Fucking fascist republican swine.

permalink
report
reply
-269 points

its not facist to try to stop kids from accessing porn

permalink
report
parent
reply
116 points
*

Parents jobs. And TONS of ways to do it without punishing everyone and collecting PII.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

How would you as a parent prevent your kids from accessing porn?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-124 points

Parents have proven they are not capable of managing it themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points
*

As you’re here on Lemmy, a site that has pornographic content, we’re going to need you to post a picture of your government ID, next to your face, with your username on a piece of paper, as a reply to this comment. You know, to prevent kids accessing porn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

We scan your balls

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

If you actually believe this is about protecting children then I have a bridge to sell you

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Fuck a bridge. Let’s sell em some “antiporn software” that is subscription based.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Putting age gates on the Internet is indeed pretty authoritarian though, and starting with porn is only the beginning

permalink
report
parent
reply
-95 points

Not authoitarian at all. Its the bare minimum

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

How shitty a parent are you to either not know how to work parental controls or better… to talk to your kids about healthy attitudes towards sex?*

*besides abstinence

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, my parents had the talk with me when they found my physical, irl folder of printed hentai art (this was like, 2002ish and I didn’t have my own PC and I didn’t have a Pornstation Portable sadly (PSP))

The “talk” was my parents sitting me down, telling me what my mom found, and then my mom getting up and telling my dad to talk to me about it, and she left, and then my dad just told me not to look at it until I was older and that was it -__-

Boomer parenting hell yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Parental controls are easy to get around in most cases, and kids are generally smarter than (most) adults when it comes to tech. I remember back in the days of AOL my dad enabled Parental Controls on my account. Pissed that my tween self couldn’t look at low resolution pictures of naked women I figured out quickly how to remedy that: I downloaded a keylogger which ran in the background of Windows all the time and when I heard the famous “Welcome! You’ve got mail!” I waited until he signed off, jumped on the PC, opened the keylog file, found a string of text that looked like a password (no one was using complex passwords back then, usually just a word or two), signed on to his account, and then re-enabled full access on my account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

But I bet you think it is fascist to pass laws which stop kids from getting shot at school?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Yes and let’s put ID verification on anything that might have curses too. Can’t risk a parent not sheltering their child hard enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Actually, can we get ID verification for voice chat in online shooters?

Shit would sound like a church in COD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

They are going to access it anyway

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

This. It’s like, do these people think kids aren’t interested in that stuff? Like, I remember getting an abstinence talk during my freshman year. I remember being told how awesome sex was, but also to wait. And even still, nearly everyone was fucking everyone else in my graduating class. Like, how willfully ignorant do you have to be to think that kids don’t hook up?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

wildly understated too…

like… middle school kids today navigated mobile devices with ease when they were toddlers…

they’re gonna know what a vpn is before they leave high school.

we’re just better off addressing the issue head on than trying to band-aid it… it won’t work

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

The world isn’t made for children, where are their fucking parents?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-70 points

Their parents are not doing a good enough job. Its time for the law to step in

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

yes it is; that’s exactly what it is. kids is the go-to reason fascists give to censor, ban, burn books, discriminate against people and control people’s bodies and lives. it’s not a coincidence that “children” is one of the 14 words.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

i dont know what you mean by 14 words. Like 14 protected classes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

BuT mUh GuNz!!!11!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Speaking as a “muh gunz” person that person is fucking stupid

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Idiot

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It is, though

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s not stopping anybody. If you are a horny enough 13 year old you’ll find it on any platform. Speaking from experience YouTube, Instagram, Reddit (obviously lemmy as well) and in short the rest of them can be pretty easily used to access porn. It’s not allowed on for example YouTube but it’s still there or it manages to be technically allowed through being “educational content”. Obviously we aren’t talking about like Brazzers or whatever being directly uploaded but there’s definitely naked people doing proactive things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
153 points

Once again, a vice is blamed for its own sake, “for the children”, instead of the thing people are running from, or the hole they are filling. It’s the Right’s version of virtue signaling.

Porn addiction is just an addiction, and removing porn will not remove addiction in people. Thirst can’t be cured by drying up the well. Saying nothing about the constitutionality of this, restricting potentially addictive content through nanny state ID systems is worthless… check history. South Korea plan was dropped, UK plans for the same thing were dropped. It’s not only ineffective, as kids will always find a way through the cracks, but it also extremely difficult to implement and erodes the bedrock of privacy. We’re not solving addiction, we’re just building a surveillance state under the guise of protection. Solutions are in addressing the root causes of addiction and fostering resilience, not in this game of whack-a-mole that sacrifices our privacy.

permalink
report
reply
85 points

I get wanting to keep porn away from children, but on the flipside I don’t trust governments with a history of criminalizing homosexuality with my porn history. Looking up, it seems that these states even kept laws against sodomy in their books.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I had to look this up, and this is so nuts, but there are currently 12 states that stilll have sodomy laws as of late 2023: Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.

I think a lot of people might not realize that sodomy is often legally defined as anything that is not PIV intercourse. So most foreplay and obviously any sex practiced by homosexual couples. I absolutely don’t get why there isn’t a stronger push to get rid of this and other dumb laws against offenses that are widely committed and/or are hard to enforce.

Well I guess this one kind of makes sense in this current state of political turmoil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Because they’re all federally illegal (until they aren’t) by Lawrence v. Texas. And of those 12, 2 definitely would overturn if Thomas has his way (Lawrence was one of the decisions he said he wants reviewed) and 2 are iffy. Texas would gladly enforce anti sodomy laws today if they could.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I just looked it up to confirm because I’ve only known it to mean butt sex, but the Wikipedia article on it agrees with you.

I don’t think any of those states actually enforce those laws though, most likely because it would be difficult to get evidence of such acts. Just because the law exists in the books doesn’t mean it’s still upheld, tons of states have “dumb laws” that aren’t enforced (you can’t keep an alligator in a bath tub, you can’t beat your wife with a stick thicker than your thumb, you can’t drive on Sundays, etc…) but we’re never removed because the process is too arduous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

We were all kids once, we found a way. I did, other kids will. Sure we can make it harder to access, but blocking it isn’t the solution that republicans think it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

It’s not a solution to the problem they say they’re looking to solve. It’s more government control, it’s big brother, it’s everything they say they don’t want, so it’s obviously exactly what they wanted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly, additionally I don’t trust governments that consistently fail to understand artistic merit in sexually graphic art and sought to ban it to maintain free expression.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I see you Mr dildo haver.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

or the hole they are filling.

Heh

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You gotta pay the troll toll, if you wanna get into that boy’s hole!

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

If you believe that laws forbidding gambling, sale of liquor, sale of contraceptives, requiring definite closing hours, enforcing the Sabbath, or any such, are necessary to the welfare of your community, that is your right and I do not ask you to surrender your beliefs or give up your efforts to put over such laws. But remember that such laws are, at most, a preliminary step in doing away with the evils they indict. Moral evils can never be solved by anything as easy as passing laws alone. If you aid in passing such laws without bothering to follow through by digging in to the involved questions of sociology, economics, and psychology which underlie the causes of the evils you are gunning for, you will not only fail to correct the evils you sought to prohibit but will create a dozen new evils as well.

–Robert A. Heinlein, Take Back Your Government

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

This isn’t even about porn addiction, it’s definitely a “think of the children!” scenario by the right-wing pearl clutchers. Meanwhile, there’s tons of horrible shit on the Internet freely available that they don’t seem to care about, along with nudity in movies. Also I love how that article claims that “residents will have to go to the deep dark corners of the internet to get their porn once pornhub is blocked” as if hundreds of other porn sites not owned by that company don’t exist 🤣 The Internet and tech improvements are literally driven by porn consumption. IDK what the number is now, but like 5-10 years ago it was “40% of all internet traffic is porn related”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s literally virtue signalling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We’re not solving addiction, we’re just building a surveillance state under the guise of protection.

That’s a feature of all of these types of schemes, not a bug.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Hey I agree with you but might want to use a different metaphor in the future. Drying the well won’t stop thirst, but neither will anything else, except well, death I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 555K

    Comments