16 points

The man that should stop Donald Trump is Donald Trump.

It’s stunning that he can say and do so much… terribleness… and still even have a chance at the presidency (again).

permalink
report
reply
-5 points

it’s a race to the bottom, and liberals are so attached to biden for some reason they seem to actively want him despite the fact that some random state senator would be a safer bet. if we get fascism I’m putting some of the blame on bidenbros

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

It’s the two party system and electoral college that causes the “lessor evil” effect. We’ll have to address that better next time.

Edit: autocorrect gave us an electric college!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Electric Collage would be a great band name.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

We’ll have to address that better next time.

is what we’re told every single time for decades and this is the result. maybe it’s time to break out plan b (before it’s banned in texas)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Has there ever been a current president that the party has not put up for re-election after their first term? The decision isn’t really up to me as a pleb Democrat, it’s up to the party in Washington D.C. on who they want to represent the party in the election. When given the choice, I’ll vote for anyone over Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I just haven’t seen the evidence that some random state sentator would be a safer bet.

The unfortunate reality is that there are still too many voters who will vote for a centrist old white man over Trump, but would not vote for a young progressive over Trump.

I didn’t like it in 2020 either, but the Democrats did what they needed to do to beat Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

the dems seem as helpless to run this geriatric conservative as the gop are to prevent an actual fascist dictator wannabe from successfully running for office.

how can both these massive parties suck so fucking hard

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Because voting in the primaries seems anathema to the young progressives who want to change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That’s a comforting story but completely unsupported by reality. Look at the exit polls from whatever state you like. The under 30 crowd gets outvoted by 2-1, sometimes a 3-1 margin!

(This gets even more embarrassing when you realize that while the two groups are about the same size of the electorate, the elderly are less likely to vote Democratic, so as a share of potential Democratic voters the 65+ is beating the brakes off the under 30s.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They voted in the early 2016 primaries too. And the same thing happened.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“Buh… buh… Biden won South Carolina!”

Yeah… and how did that work out?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_South_Carolina

Trump - 1,385,103, 55.11%
Biden - 1,091,541, 43.43%

I couldn’t believe people using the South Carolina primary as the reason Biden should be the candidate. Since when do we let red states decide who the Democratic candidate should be?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

These are the same people telling us Demcoracy is on the line

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m glad I’m a progressive that votes in the primary. I plan to vote in more progressives myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thank you! Please keep doing it, and if possible, asking your friends to!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And you are proposing what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

i dont… i kinda think were all fucked. the only action possible here is to just keep voting lesser evil.

i used to hope, but that runs out after the first few decades

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They way to fix things is voting reform. But it can’t be just any reform.

We have to ditch Ordinal voting systems. Every single one of them leads to some degree of two party dominance, with voters having to prioritize strategy over their own needs, because not doing so means they will be actively punished.

Cardinal systems are the only way to escape. Strategic voting becomes less necessary and less impactful.

My current favorite system is STAR. It takes all the great ideas of the best cardinal voting system (Score) and adds in an automatic runoff that greatly reduces the impact of clone candidate attacks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

A no holds barred Yu-Gi-Oh match. Winner becomes president, loser cleans the white house bathrooms for the next 4 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Will there be some kid competing while possessed by an ancient pharoah?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I believe you’re under the mistaken impression that u/originalucifer is actually running one or both of these parties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I never said this nor do I believe it. But engaging in doomscrolling and screaming into the void is not going to do much so I’m looking for ideas. Yes they are all way too old, there’s no denying that. The question is: now what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

bOtH SIdeS

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The Democrats are generally a fairly ineffective ally on good days. The Republicans are an effective enemy every day. It’s not an equivocation to say those are both crappy options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

indeed. what we really need to do is political action outside of just voting, because voting for genocide joe or donald “hitler” trump isn’t gonna work very well

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

uhhh no.

“both sides” is pretending both suffer from the same issue… i have clearly not made that case

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

uhhh yes.

“both sides” is presenting them both as equally bad… you have clearly made that case

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Because the electorate is doing little to nothing at the local scale to change voting methodology. Until that happens in a broad fashion, the two parties will continue to be a problem.

Edit: you can downvote all you want, it doesn’t change reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’m pretty old. Biden is hands down the best president in my lifetime.

He’s way older than I am, which is a problem, but he’s also a national hero for beating Trump in 2020 and making the win stick, which was more difficult than it seemed.

Since then he’s been great on jobs, infrastructure, defense, and a host of other issues. Not that I agree with him on everything, but to call him a run of the mill conservative Dem, as some do in these comments, is almost slander. He’s an old-school Democrat who survived all the way through the Reagan revolution. The old-school Dems ran the country for almost 50 years from about 1933 to 1980, and did a pretty good job.

In 2020 I was 100% behind Liz Warren and disliked Biden. I thought he’d lose, but this year I’ll gladly vote for him. If he beats Trump for good, they’ll be making statues of him.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I have never approved of the person I voted for president

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Voting isn’t a valentine. It’s a chess move. —Rebecca Solnit

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Except the chess piece doesn’t honestly care what you think and a couple thousand people in flyover country can put you in checkmate regardless of how you move.

Voting is more like beating your head against a wall. If enough people join you then you might just move the building. But don’t expect it to feel good afterwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I fundamentally disagree. If this was at all true, Republicans wouldn’t still be working so hard to make it difficult to vote in red states.

The point isn’t for your vote to feel good; if that’s your end goal, you are naive. The point is that it’s strategic to an end, something the Fascists understand quite well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Forfeiting is a chess move, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

but the people who say this keep losing, so it doesn’t work in reality

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Untrue. Look at the midterms, where we were supposed to have a “red wave,” which wound up with places like Michigan having a Dem majority in all three chambers and Republicans getting only a very thin majority in the US House, or all the people who voted for “not-Trump.”

Strategic voting absolutely works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yes, welcome to politics.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments