Have you heard about the president who received money from China and other foreign countries? No, not the current president. The former one.

House Republicans recently launched an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden, premised on the claim that he is hiding, in the words of Speaker Mike Johnson, “millions of dollars in payments from America’s foreign adversaries.” As yet, they have produced no evidence to back up the idea that Biden profited. (The payments they have flagged involve the business interests of his son Hunter Biden, who is facing two separate federal indictments at the moment, and his brother James.)

Meanwhile, House Democrats on Thursday released a report detailing how former President Donald Trump received, and then tried to hide, millions in payments from America’s foreign adversaries. Unlike in the impeachment inquiry, which is premised on a suspicion that Republicans hope will turn up evidence, the receipts are here.

The saga of the foreign payments is a good case study in how Trump has taught Americans to tolerate brazen corruption—so long as it’s his. To do this, Trump relies on two tactics. First, he does much of it out in the open, recognizing that voters tend to assume that only hidden deeds are nefarious. Second, he finds ways to slow-walk the release of the most damaging information, so that by the time the full picture is clear, the public has become almost inoculated—as though it had been out in the open all along.

Non-paywall link

30 points

Going out on a limb here… we don’t tolerate it. There isn’t much stopping them though, esp with a stacked SCOTUS and GQP.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Naaah we tolerate it. Remember when Reagan sold arms to the country that held American hostages during his predecessor’s term. You know the country he illegally colluded with to beat the incumbent president. Selling them weapons to circumvent a US embargo. To fund international terrorism like the contras in South America. And then when he and his VP were caught red handed. They passed it off to a patsy. Ollie North! The criminal president at his term limit retiring comfortably as Republican Messiah. The criminal VP going on to be president. Who then pardoned the former president and Ollie North of their crimes. And America collectively yawned. So much so that cartoons do a better job covering it than most history books people are exposed to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Sorry. I’m still not tolerating corrupt governing. If you do, that’s okay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nowhere did I ever say I tolerated it. I’m just asking who this We is you think you’re talking about. Because America clearly tolerates it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

like weeds in your garden, corruption breeds more corruption… Trump spread weeds everywhere he went…

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Johnny Knotweed Seed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Donny Nettleseed

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

America was already tolerating a ton of corruption, though, just much less brazen.

Basically, bribing a politicians is completely legal as long as you don’t tell the world what you’re bribing them to do.

Blackmailing them with threats of supporting their opponents if they don’t say or do what you want is completely fine too, apparently.

The trick is to not be too blatant about it, brag about it, deny it and then brag about it some more like the Mango Mussolini does.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Yeah. Every single time there’s an op-ed accusing Trump of inventing something, inevitably it’s just something he exploited and dialed up to 11. The only people more confident of Trump’s abilities than his supporters are his detractors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Yeah. He’s an especially malignant tumor, not the underlying cancer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“It’S not bribEry It’S LObbyiNG!!“

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not much sane people can do. The people who could do something don’t…or haven’t so far.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Didn’t. They /didn’t/.

Its too late now.

Trump, nearly single handedly, normalized so much absolute insanity that we are now more on par with what we were taught to call Banana Republics for their economic systems that do not function well for the vast majority of people, unstable politics and unstable political and social institutions and norms, oh and domestic terrorism.

That shit takes /decades/ to recover from, on average, if you look at the works of academic political scientists (which are very different from politicians espousing ideologies or rhetoric or talking points).

This is not going to just all be nicely fixed in another Presidential term or two, us millenials will be dealing with this until we reach retirement age.

If we reach retirement age.

Climate Change aint slowing down amd thats gonna make everything even more dire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

we are now more on par with what we were taught to call Banana Republics for their economic systems that do not function well for the vast majority of people, unstable politics and unstable political and social institutions and norms, oh and domestic terrorism.

Now that’s some irony! We call them “Banana Republics” because of how they were dominated and exploited by American fruit companies, with support from the US government, up to and including building private armies and calling in the CIA to do coup d’etats. The only thing new here is that the Republicans are normalizing doing the corruption to ourselves instead of just to others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ah, grue. We meet again.

+1 on the history here. The history of Dole Corporation in Hawaii is also a fascinating read.

My only riposte is, Republicans have not.merely.exploited corruption, but openly embraced it and invited Common Americans to ride along on the adventure. If we survive this, it will take a century at.keast to unfurl and air out in the social realm. It’s not even clear at this point whether the environmental damage could be undone.

Sadly we’ll be at war with Canada in 15 years to literate their fresh water and oil sands from Godless Socialism, because they won’t be charging fealty or usury for insulin and aspirin. The US.will export Freedom at gunpoint, as we do.

But! 50 hears hence, well have arable land and a Northwest Passage! Wouldn’t that be a feat?

/s, times being what they are. Dense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You are more technically correct, but in common parlance for those who do not seek out to become more informed about history and politics beyond high school, the vast majority of I guess ‘laypeople’ just think that terms like banana republic and third world country just mean a poor country with unstable government, despite those terms not really actually meaning that.

The reasons why this happens are hilariously also basically the Republicans fault:

Anti Intellectualism is a big thing for most of them culturally, and Republican policies demonstrably have seriously worsened the quality of a K-12 education all across the country, and kept many families poor and unable to access higher education.

… and it is nearly always Republican talking heads and political figures which spent decades being the most prolific users of those terms incorrectly, while televised and in print or later online journalism, contributing largely to normalizing the incorrect usage of these and other similar terms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He is still free, stirring up shit, and running for president again. This is ongoing. I really don’t understand why he isn’t hanging for treason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because he “won” an election, and holding him to account means holding others with elected power to account (even when it doesn’t benefit other people in their party in other elections).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Partly because the idea of himself having to face any real consequences for his actions is, at this point in his life, actually literally inconceivable at many levels to him, having spent essentially his entire life conning people and breaking all kinds of laws all the time and never really suffering any serious drawback from this due to his enormous wealth and social privilege.

Also, partly due to him seriously believing that he has so much influence and so many fanatical supporters that he can rely on being easily able to whip them up into a frenzy to, you know, just do a coup for him and install him as dictator.

On a societal level, why isnt he hanging for treason yet?

He stacked many government positions that would be likely to be important in the actual legal mechanics of a treason conviction with his own corrupt cronies, and also has so many ardent supporters of himself personally that many of these supporters were elected to other powerful positions of government, and again he generally has so many violent and stupid supporters that an extremely credible threat of mass domestic terrorist violence exists should anything bad happen to dear leader.

We are talking about a person whose legal team recently argued, in court, that Trump, having been president, is actually legally able to order a special forces team to assassinate his domestic political rivals, and this is ok because there is a check and balance in the American political system of a president doing this, of being able to be tried and convicted by congress.

You know, congress, which is also comprised of many of his political rivals, who he is allowed to order assassinations of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s plenty sane people can do. They just don’t because it’s too hard to show up to the polls once or twice a year, apparently. Or too hard to vote pragmatically instead of idealistically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You mean he taught the “liberal media” and the cons this. Normal people hate this brazen corruption and want to see it severely punished.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Liberal media… Like the website this article is hosted on? Or CNN covering it regularly? Reuters?

How would you define liberal media?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s in quotation marks, it’s most likely tongue in cheek.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was about to say Whoosh… but I don’t get the first sentence then. Liberal media as in Fox News since even that’s liberal to MAGA now? Cons being conservatives yeah?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 472K

    Comments