In launch event on Friday, agency shared plans to test over US cities to see if it’s quiet enough by engaging ‘the people below’

Nasa has unveiled a one-of-a-kind quiet supersonic aircraft as part of the US space agency’s mission to make commercial supersonic flight possible.

In a joint ceremony with Lockheed Martin Skunk Works in Palmdale, California, on Friday, Nasa revealed the X-59, an experimental aircraft that is expected to fly at 1.4 times the speed of sound – or 925mph (1,488 km/h).

The aircraft, which stands at 99.7ft (30.4 metres) long and 29.5ft wide, has a thin, tapered nose that comprises nearly a third of the aircraft’s full length – a feature designed to disperse shock waves that would typically surround supersonic aircraft and result in sonic booms.

40 points

pretty neat that the image of the plane for the article is shot from so close that you can only see 1/3 of it, but to be fair it does include the screens of people’s phones as they take a picture of the thing. kind of like going to a concert.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Haha I wonder about the ungodly amount of fuel it burns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
1 point

Old news now. The evil in the hearts of humans will be our collective undoing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The website blasted me in the ass with ads, while simultaneously begging for donations

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah but with the pictures on the phones, we actually end up with more picture per picture with this method.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yo dawg, I heard you like pictures

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

It’s proportions make it hard to frame it for an article headline picture. This is cropped to show a colorful array of the fun parts: cockpit, landing gear engine intake with a clear X-59. It’s like trying to make a cover picture feature a pencil.

This other article uses a dramatic background to fill the space. It’s from NASA though, so they’re not limited to the conference. They don’t have to have their own picture to say “I was there”

https://kbin.social/m/technology@lemmy.world/t/758938

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Please don’t. We need to be reducing air travel, not increasing it. Go invent a quiet supersonic train or something.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

the transatlantic railway is feeling less and less like a funny absurdist joke by the hour

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Let’s get started on the Snowpiercer too

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What is your plan for intercontinental travel? Increased ship travel, taking a week and burning massive amounts of crude fuel oil? Just cut off the Americas and Australia from Europe, Africa and Asia for non-commercial purposes? The supersonics have mostly been used for trans-atlantic and trans-pacific travel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Less and more efficient airplanes. Supersonic aircraft will consume more fuel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Let’s get weird with blimps

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

These kinds of comments only say it’s wrong; they never make a valid contribution to finding a solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The guy you’re replying to or the nonce suggesting we shelve all transportation technology and only use trains?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

sailing and solar power exists, and i’m pretty dang certain we could get an ocean liner to cross the atlantic in less than a week with modern tech. Also probably still less emissions than air travel considering how absurly much fuel that uses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There is a reason the tall masted rigged ships disappeared for regular travel; most people don’t want to take a month to cross the ocean in close quarters. Cruise ships are the closest analog to a long haul jet, and are no better to twice as CO2 producing than the airline travel, and the fuel they burn is the lowest grade fuel oil with the worst additional pollution. If you are moving across the ocean, or even just traveling, most people won’t be able to pilot their own sailing yacht and take 15-30 days to do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That is not said often enough, thank you !

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m trying to fight the downvoters, you were on -3 when I saw your comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Looks like it worked, thanks ! My turn now ^^

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

That’s called a hyperloop, nobody liked the idea.

I think the next innovation will be slow electric powered lighter than air travel. Airships may be the future.

That and these new supersonic planes, they’re already happening. Boom supersonic is currently testing their demonstration plane based on this nasa project.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s called a hyperloop, nobody liked the idea.

I think the next innovation will be slow electric powered lighter than air travel. Airships may be the future.

That and these new supersonic planes, they’re already happening. Boom supersonic is currently testing their demonstration plane based on this nasa project. Their next step is to build a supersonic business class jet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Oh bug off! We need faster travel for a long time now!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Being self centered like this is why we’re screwing up our planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

The planet is fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

need

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

i agree, we need to invest in more high speed railways

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We need faster travel?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Now the fuel efficiency problem needs to be reckened with. The sonic boom was the main reason why supersonic planes were shelved but poor fuel efficiency was the other 800 pound gorilla in the room.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

That’s what we really need right now. Faster air travel for fewer people.

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

But how else will the ultra-wealthy jet over to their summer homes in new Zealand when wet bulb temperatures exceed human survival in the Northern Hemisphere?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Pierce said the X-59’s job would be to “collect data from the people below, determine if that sonic thump is acceptable and then turn the data over to US and international regulatory authorities in hopes to then lift that ban”.

Why can’t commercial airlines fund the project, then? Why is NASA investing public money to deregulate private industry?

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Huh? NASA is providing thought leadership to expand the possibilities of human travel, but has no interest in running a commercial airline.

Many technologies you use every day started as NASA research

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Why are tax dollars going to something that will only benefit a small percentage of people and will cause relatively bad environmental damage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Are you aware what NASA stands for?

I personally am happy some of my tax dollars go towards advancing science.

The reason we have issues in society…homeless people, lack of universal healthcare, etc is not because we find NASA, it’s via mismanagement of the funds we have, and bad politics, etc. None of which are NASAs fault or purpose.

NASA does a huge amount of environmental research as well. But part of their team focuses on experimental flight, and this is a product of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nasa is always researching supersonic/hypersonic travel, that’s what a space agency does.

It would be hard to list ALL of the ways that research benefits you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The first A in NASA is aeronautics. They just do the science. I would say deregulation is a fairly strong word here. It’s more like they’d be updating the laws to reflect modern tech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This is literally how every expensive R&D project gets done. Private companies won’t dump this kind of money into good R&D, but the government will because they don’t care about ROI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Except this ignores the existence of bell labs, you know the private R&D lab with ten Nobel prizes and a laundry list of inventions that quite literally shaped our modern world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Deregulate is not the same as engineering a solution to solve the problem that was previously solved by regulations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The assumption that all regulations are good now, and in perpetuity, is the issue here. Deregulation of shite or outdated regs is a good thing ffs.

It’s insane to me that the word seems so opaque to people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is probably defense spending, tbh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

American is a Socialist country for those wealthy enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

This is outsourced to Lockheed Martin so it’s basically just using Nasa to fund the military even more. There is nothing commercially interesting about this. It’s all military planes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, this might be missile research.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<— rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments