155 points

Honestly, it doesn’t matter at this point. The debates are only useful for sound bites and headlines.

The other Republicans have no actual shot at winning; 82% still want Trump and don’t care about the Hitler larping or whether he’s a convicted criminal, a rapist, a fraudster, etc. He’s their guy, the monster they always wanted who will exact vengeance upon their always-nebulous “enemy” for a litany of misdirected and mostly-fictitious transgressions.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

Even if people watched the debate, Trump will just ramble on incoherently as Haley tries in vain to get out talking points and the whole thing will be absolute nonsensical babble.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

And his cult will cheer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Back when there were four TV channels debates made sense. It allowed candidates to respond in real time to each other, and to address the American people directly.

But thanks to social media they can respond to each other in real time right now, or let everyone know they’re chillin’ in Cedar Rapids without needing to appear on prime time.

tl;dr - Unless the League of Women Voters is running the debate I honestly don’t care about them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

I think you underestimate some of those things. People know about the stuff you listed and they still want him.

Keep in mind I’m not saying this to be pro Democrat or Biden.

What I’ve learned in school growing up in NH is that everything I was taught about the world being a secure good place was a lie. From what I’ve seen, a lot of people stay naive to reality. I went my own way and have seen a ton of fucked up shit in my life. Meanwhile there’s people just taking the narrow life path acting as if evil isn’t just as equal in amount to the good in life. A lot of the adult I knew as a kid… Aren’t the image that they portrayed. A lot of people just fake their social life. It’s really surreal and bizarre here.

If you see reality for what it is… Life sucks. I wish I could have just been one of those average narrow-pathed people.

Not trying to say that in an offensive way or to one up you or whatever…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think you underestimate some of those things. People know about the stuff you listed and they still want him.

But…that’s what they said

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I could have been drunk. 🤏

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You could have saved so much typing by ranting about red pills and blue pills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m grew up in NH too. He’s right, it’s weirdly sheltered place.

  • There are almost no black people, so people here don’t think they’re racist, but it’s largely because they have few opportunities to be.

  • They think Manchester, NH is a big scary city. Where you need to carry a gun or you’ll be killed by a homeless drifter.

  • There are surprisingly few pan handlers besides at tourist spots in the summer and along the MA border.

  • You still don’t have to wear a seatbelt or even insure your car. Because they think everyone will do the right thing in an accident. Unless you’re in Manchester (or maybe Nashua).

  • it has a numb nut Republican governor, but all Democrat federal representation.

It’s a weird ass place if you’ve lived here long enough to experience it. I blame the radon (which decays to lead btw) and arsenic in the drinking water.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I guess these twerking cretins don’t realize that Trump already considers them as his enemies because they ‘stood against him’. And that they will be some of the first facing his proverbial firing squad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

The other Republicans have no actual shot at winning

I mean, it’s not zero, Trump could have a heart attack or something tomorrow and it wouldn’t surprise me that much.

Same goes for Biden, too, not sure VP Harris would make a compelling canidate. Maybe I’m wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Having VP Harris safely in the shadows like Mr Cheney was hasn’t been good for her exposure and for building cred. But they needed to do that to appease the racist rednecks … who weren’t going to vote for her anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Who will they nominate if the Supreme Court decides he’s ineligible to run?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They won’t. The SC has no obligation to rule fairly or impartially, or ethically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

unfortunately trump wins either this selection or the next guaranteed. he packed the SUPREME court he can appeal ANY ruling to that court.

Also the Democrats will run Hillary or Kamala so they can loose in 2028 for financials

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I bet it would be Nikki Haley. Vivek is annoying and not a Christian, and Ron is really weird and only liked in Florida.

And despite being just as unhinged and authoritarian as her comrades, she has some appeal among the moderates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Didn’t Vivek drop out and endorse Trump?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Very well said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

I would bet that Trump refuses to debate when he gets the nomination. Hey, no one seems to care.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

His people don’t want a debate, they want a rally, something to entertain their vanishingly small minds. The rest of us just want him to shut the fuck up and go away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

He Can have a rally anytime he wants one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Tell Trump that Biden will be at the debate whether he decides to appear or not. And that Biden will get a free public town hall / softball interview if Trump isn’t there. And then follow through with it if he doesn’t appear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Trump will just schedule a counter-town hall on Fox News. He 100% won’t meet anyone on stage between now and November.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

He literally did that in 2020, and what the other responder said, happened. He scheduled his own town hall on another network, and Biden spoke for an hour at the agreed upon debate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

So… exactly like 2020.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Kinda starting to show that it’s not about policy and all about cult of personality

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We all know this

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well, Trump did say that he’s “eager” to debate Biden in 2024. But, remembering back to the debate(s) with Biden in the previous campaign, it was absolutely useless and I had to turn it off. Trump would not stop shouting over Biden and everyone else.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-debates-biden-commission-presidential-debates-428216dc2a0e9692a64dfde800753f72

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

NH is extremely pro Trump unless you’re rich. Its really weird here. People are very defensive, even if you’re not pro Democrat. Also people think all gay people here prance around acting like girls. It’s really strange here. It’s kind of addicting trying to figure why people think like that. There’s a whole movement to get people to move here to create sovereignty.

I honestly think the civil war already started here.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

NH went for Biden by 52.71% to Trump’s 45.36%. And while the governor is a Republican, all representatives and senators are Democrats. So I’m not sure you’re right here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m not really sure what theyre talking about tbh. I’ve lived here my whole life – my entire family is conservative catholic – and I still know plenty of poor and rich democrats. It’s different in the more rural areas though – they tend to run red. Southern NH probably helps outweigh the red rural areas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I was about to contradict you but I realized I kinda agree with what you’re saying – although calling my friends up there “rich” is a bit of a stretch. They are not exactly wealthy but they make good salaries doing interesting work with companies based in Boston or remote. Hell, I’m buying land either there or Maine. Got a Starlink and everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s a very purple state. I travel there often from a red state and it’s very different. The trump supporters just tend to be way louder than most, he does after all seem to capture the most unhinged people in society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Debates require you to enter in good faith as if your perspective can be changed.

If you can’t commit to changing your mind you can’t debate.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Perhaps sway the audience, but I’ve never seen a debate where the participants ever changed their mind. Debates are about showcasing ideas and then seeing if those ideas stand up to the critiques of your opponent.

Honestly, if a participant ever changed their mind during a debate, I’d think they were a poor representative of that idea. By the time you’re on stage at a formal debate you should have already thoroughly considered your opinion from every angle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m arguing that the principal of debate requires that you have a mind that can be changed. I’m not actually suggesting that one does, necessarily, change their mind over the course of a debate. However, it can be incredibly convincing to show a shift in thinking (taking the audience with you) where you do cede some caveats, but use them to further your argument and make it more convincing.

I listen to intelligence squared, and I wish that debates were formally moderated and scored.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m arguing that the principal of debate requires that you have a mind that can be changed.

Having an open mind that can be changed if provided with sufficient evidence is fantastic, something we should all strive for.

That being said, I don’t think it is necessarily needed for a debate. If you’re in a formally structured debate I would hope that you have fully considered all aspects, the pros and the cons. During the debate they should be making their points and critiquing the opposing viewpoint. Changing their mind would, in my opinion, be a disservice to the audience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re not, though. The opponents are scripted, using tested talking points, and are tightly rehearsed in what to say in response to which questions. If caught flat footed, they simply repeat an established talking point, and the time limits on the debate as well as the agreed upon format prevents any followup from the hosts.

Debates are purely about charisma. They’re about projecting an air of knowledge and authority, whether or not you actually possess such knowledge. That’s why Trump does well - he simply lies with great conviction and excessive language. People who actually try to argue with him intellectually will lose, because he’s not doing that. He imitates Dwight Schrute imitating Mussolini.

If you want to know where a candidate stands, read the policy papers they post. Watch the one on one interviews but keep in mind they’re not confrontational - they’re designed to be a forum for the candidate to state their position, not to get them to explain or justify them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was speaking about debates more broadly, not just political debates but also scholarly debates. I don’t think the participants changing their minds would be a virtue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Nothing to gain, everything to lose…

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-primary-r/2024/new-hampshire/

Haley 40%
Trump 40%
DeSantis 4%
Ramaswamy 4%
Hutchinson 1%

With Ramaswamy out, that could change.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 477K

    Comments