3 points

Chromebooks are nothing but junk thin clients Schools need to invest in real laptops on a rolling maintenance and replacement schedule

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Chromebooks are just budget-spec laptops. Hardware-wise, they ought to be fine for anything a K-12 student needs to do on a day-to-day basis (and for anything they can’t do on it, it’s probably a good teaching point for them to learn how to use a server or VM or cloud instance).

This is a business decision on Google’s part because they sold the machines at low or negative profit in order to build what they thought would be an ongoing revenue stream for them, which has not seemed to materialize.

OTOH, the real questions should not be aimed at Google, as much as it was local schools who signed the contracts with them without considering the e-waste and other downstream effects of what they were signing up for. That’s the sort of thing that I think needs to be factored into municipal and corporate purchasing: it’s all focused on the immediate spend, not on the long-term cost (and in the case especially of a municipality, that should be the cost to the community at large).

But hey… I bet a lot of them are going to turn up on eBay. As in the 90s when corporations were turning over hardware every 18-24 months, someone else’s poor decisionmaking can be a great subsidy for hobbyists. Not good for the planet, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I want to get my kid a new Chromebook, but the naming convention is super fucked

I have no idea if one I’m looking at is the same as the one I bought, 1 year newer, last year, even older, who the fuck knows

2 core CPU before, 4 slower cores, 4 faster cores of a different architecture/company…

Why can’t it just be like anything else. Thinkpad 420. Next year, 430. Next year, 440. Cool, but Chromebooks are a pain in the ass

permalink
report
reply
4 points

It’s astonishing how much time and money my school must have spent on repairing, replacing, and performing software/IT maintenance on these piece of shit computers instead of just using brands that work.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Back in 2008 my school were throwing away about 200 workstations, with monitors. We asked if we could buy some, but they told us no; they were being donated to a charity which ships them to Uganda.

I’m hoping these Chromebooks aren’t “recycled” but instead have a similar fate as those desktops from my school. I’m in Indonesia right now and could give away thousands of Chromebooks in a heartbeat.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Eh, how so, you can just install Linux on them last I heard.

Why would you just throw out something you can put an up to date OS on?

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Yeah, but you cant expect your average teacher to know how to install or use Linux.

Really they should be selling them on or donating them to people in need?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They don’t need to have the teachers to install Linux (though that’d be welcome to do as part of classes). Just hand them over to a reputable IT that will get them ready and going with a good distro.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Please Teachers are some of the most highly educated dumb people we have During the COVID Remote Learning they didn’t even know what streaming was much less were competent enough to do it Their students know more about streaming and how to broadcast a stream A greatly wasted resource The Smart Board my district has in every classroom are capable and setup for remote learning then sat there unused

permalink
report
parent
reply

Sustainable Tech

!sustainabletech@lemmy.sdf.org

Create post

Sabaidee, Welcome!

This is a community for promoting sustainability in tech and computing. This includes: understanding the impact that our tech/computing choices have on the environment; purchasing or re-using devices that are sustainable and repairable; how to properly recycle or dispose of old devices when it is beyond use; and promoting software and services that allow us to reduce our environmental impact in the long term, both at work and in our personal lives.

This isn’t a competition, it’s a reminder to stay grounded when making your decisions. Remember: The most sustainable device is the one that you are already using.

Rules:

  1. Stay on-topic. Everything from sustainable smartphones to data centers and the green energy that powers them is fair game.
  2. Be excellent to each other.

Note: This is hosted on Lemmy at SDF. If you are browsing from the larger Fediverse, search for

!sustainabletech@lemmy.sdf.org

and hit the Subscribe button.

Community stats

  • 33

    Monthly active users

  • 34

    Posts

  • 131

    Comments