78 points

Can i borrow a billion dollars please i promise I’ll do economy stuff or whatever

permalink
report
reply
62 points

taking the bank’s money and turning it into stuff on a scale that makes them afraid to foreclose on you just sounds like winning at capitalism

permalink
report
reply
54 points

like, sure, call in the loan, good luck repossessing all of my hidden buried treasure

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

the loan was the friends they made along the way

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Taking out a $100 million loan only to reveal the actual use of that cash was training and arming Maoists in the mountains.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points
*

Kiyosaki also based the “poor dad” on his own dad. The book states the poor dad is an unsuccessful person because he decided to work in an actual job, paid his debt and never teach his child the grind.

In actuality his dad was a school teacher who at the end of life is well respected within his community and plays a role in Hawaiian politics.

permalink
report
reply

If you’re a thousand dollars in debt you have a problem, if you’re a billion dollars in debt they have a problem.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

How the fuck does that even happen? Who was loaning this man money? Why? Was no one looking at anything before giving him more money? No one asked how much debt he already had?

Why can’t I get a loan for $1,200,000,000? Hell no one would even give me a loan for $500k to buy a house. And my net worth is apparently much higher than this dude with it being slightly above $0 rather than negative $1.2 billion.

I feel like there should be a limit on individuals that you can have like, let’s say $1 million of debt total. Any more than that and everyone tells you “Nope, pay up.”

Also shouldn’t having more loans mean no one will loan you money? The person most deserving of a multi million dollar loan is certainly not the guy with millions of dollars in debt, it’s someone who’s never had a loan in their life. For some reason having more debt makes banks seemingly more willing to give you money and I cannot comprehend it.

permalink
report
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply

Exactly though; Why on earth would any bank ever lend that kind of money, given this is the case? The banks are creating their own problem by giving “rich” people money seemingly without even bothering to check their finances

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Also shouldn’t having more loans mean no one will loan you money?

That rule only applies to us poors

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Loans are given out for 1 reason, to receive interest payments.

If he’s making the interest payments, then they’re going to keep loaning him money.

Lenders often make stupid decisions and risky loans but at its core, a loan is determined by two(three) things.

  1. Does the lender believe the borrower has enough income to pay the minimum monthly payments?

  2. Does the lender believe the borrower has enough assets, which if liquidated could pay off the remaining debt?

  3. Is it worth the risk?

I’m no finance expert and there’s a lot of specifics between different types of loans that have different reasons. Like a personal loan, mortgage, car loan, business loan. Way more than that idk.

There’s also reasons banks will or will not loan money that are a little more vibe based, ie racism, classism.

But the lenders, either correctly or incorrectly, have determined he has the income streams and the assets(sounds like he owns lots of property), that risking 1.2 bil made financial sense. A lot of thst probably is tied to real estate.

Having said all that holy shit that’s a lot of money. Assuming he’s paying only the interest at 3% apr that’s $36,000,000 a year. Fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 5K

    Posts

  • 140K

    Comments