84 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
17 points

lol how much ram does that need when they’re shipping every bit of data on your computer to their servers to do processing on there?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Why not outsource the power usage and hardware costs to the consumer and just reap the end result?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Meh, Windows itself, even with all the bloat still active, doesn’t need more than 2 Gigs. That’s one of the few issues microsoft isn’t responsible for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Try using it on a 2 or 4 GB machine. It’s pretty much impossible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

If Microsoft wants more RAM just to do AI shit on my computer, I’d rather have even less just to make sure they cant.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Be careful with what you wish for… if they can’t do it on your computer, then they’ll send your data to the cloud to do it there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You now understand why I constantly run at 10 bytes below my OS drive’s limit. They cant take consent away if what they want to do is physically impossible. Sure you can delete some temporary files but that’s only going to net you 1GB max. Good fucking luck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

My next OS will be some kind of Linux. I just had to reinstall Windows 11 because it corrupted it’s install after some time. I had to uninstall so much crap and regedit so many thinks just to get it back to where I was before. I don’t want Bing search in my windows search results. I don’t want your stupid widgets and I don’t want your browser or 90% of your default apps. And no I don’t want office 360 or onedrive. So stop forcing it into my face. When Linux gets Plasma 6 and HDR support there is only holding me back my Nvidia GPUs Linux compatibility. While I hah to install windows 11 again I played a lot of games on my Steam Deck! It’s is awesome and only some games with obscure anti cheat don’t run. (well some times they don’t run on windows too)

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

nvidia opensourced their drivers because of that lapsus kid.

the community is already building a state of the art open driver for nvidia 2xxxx and above.

only a matter of time, but even then nvidia is pretty usable with the proprietary drivers nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just saying, but tweaking stuff via regedit is a surefire way to get your Windows install corrupted sooner or later.

dism, sfc… and disabling the preview update channel, are your friends to have a stable Windows install.

If you don’t want Bing results in your search, then use something like Everything to search for files. It’s faster, and will only show you files, all of them.

The widgets you can disable, and with Powertoys even bypass the start menu completely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I love to bash MS, but this feels like an industry-wide trend to /never/ care about optimizing beyond the bar of “typical specs of new devices in rich countries”. I’m guessing it’s just to limit labor costs, and computers are less-rapidly-improving than the 90s/00s?

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Code optimization has pretty much fallen by the way side since ram prices keep going down and cpu performance keeps improving.

Why spend the time if you don’t have to?

Browsers are some of the worst culprits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Browser canvas is one of the worst culprits: it has to keep a buffer with an uncompressed bitmap several screens in size.

Old browsers used to keep a single screen worth of canvas buffer, then redraw stuff as you scrolled… which made it a horrible experience. You can still find some of that with “clever” web designs where they replace fonts or move things dynamically as you scroll.

Then you have websites with “infinite scroll” that just keep increasing the canvas buffer size more and more and more, to infinity and beyond… and people wonder why their Facebook or Reddit tabs use so much RAM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Just for the sake of a beautiful audited and blazingly fast codebase that tuns qo good that Raspberry Pi user can run your stuff too.

I love optimisation!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

premature optimization is the root of all evil - Donald Knuth

which does not excuse a total lack of optimization, but gotta hit those kpi’s

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

if it remember it correctly it was said in relation to algorithm optimization > code optimization

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

It already should have that. 8 GB is the absolute bare fucking minimum for most computers these days, but unless you have 16, it’s a generally unpleasant experience.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

For windows, yes. For Linux and OSx, 8gb si still ok for most usecase

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

While 8GB is typically enough for Linux today, it may not be enough a few years from now. Buying a laptop with 8GB of soldered in RAM would limit the useful life of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It will probably depend on distro. Some distros might get more bloated, but I think most won’t do anything that makes them unusable on lower-spec hardware, especially those that specifically have low system requirements as one of their core tenets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

With 8G oom killer will kill my Firefox process.

I was evaluating Linux desktop prior to switching my work pc to Linux with an 8G VM and it wasn’t enough for just browsing and general tinkering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yep, browsing, developing, listening to music all alright on 8GB, could probably run on even 4.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

My memory idles on around 3341MiB with a browser and just a few basic daemons like Syncthing used in mint cinnamaon. 4GB is pretty tight unless you are willing to make some behavioural changes or use a less friendly distro. But 8GB is more than enough.

Different story trying to run VMs on my server, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I have 8 and am able to play 4x games at high settings w/o significant lag until late game lol. People really tend to blow this one out of proportion. Unless you’re an incredibly heavy user you probably don’t need more than 8 and 16 still feels luxurious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

“Incredibly heavy user” here, my Windows 11 boots into 9GB thanks to a few tools and a LibreOffice preloader… then gets close to 16GB the moment I start a few VMs and some dev containers in VSCode.

Fortunately, when I got this laptop on a -50% sale with just 8GB, I made sure that I’d be able to add a 32GB memory stick… so now it keeps running with up to 20GB of cache, and it flies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Compared to the average person, yes, you are a very heavy user. Most people use their laptop for little more than browsing the internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

8 GB is the absolute bare fucking minimum for most computers these days

I keep seeing this statement all around the web but it is still amazing that we need that much RAM even for today.

Don’t get me wrong, I know 8 GB is becoming the standard even for mobile phones, so it is only logical to assume to bump this number for PCs (why no 12 GBS of RAM? IDK) and I have been using 16 GBs of RAM for 10 years now, it is a MacBook Pro and for me Apple does not make it clear to see how much of that RAM I’m actually using… Regardless RAM has never been a problem for me, with casual usage, and I always thought 8 GBs should work the same for even a lighter usage, why do I say that? Because before moving to such a Mac I used a laptop with 4 GBs of RAM around 2011-2014 and it was a pain in the ass to use (the processor was shit as well) for simple navigation for my thesis… So yeah if you think 8 GBs is bad, try 4 GBs.

Another reason I think 8 GBs is “a high amount for casual usage” is that my work PC had also 4 GBs of RAM, but there was not a reason to hoard tabs and such, so it was very manageable (also the processor wasn’t shit, but it was like a Core i5 or something like that, the usual office PCs you see and know), if we are talking about bottlenecks it would be the shitty HDD speeds LMAO.

What I think you guys all mean with 8 GBs of RAM is the bare minimum for nowadays standard is if you use it for IT related topics or you like to hoard stuff in it (which ain’t bad, unused RAM is wasted RAM after all) or simply depend on heavy programs which ain’t the web browser, for casuals I’d say 6 GBs would be a fair number, although it is not usual, and fuck 4 GBs of RAM in 2024, for any kind of device lol (I bet offices still use that dog shit).

Anyway I’d personally aim for 16 GBs of RAM or more regardless, for any of my future purchases, because I like to keep my stuff for years to come.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I am on the poorer side and living in one of the central European countries (yeah I’m a teen)

I only have a core 2 duo desktop with 3 GB of ram and a laptop with a i5 also with 3gb of ram, both only HDD machines

The desktop now runs Linux, but because it has components even Intel doesn’t want to list on their website (the mobo) it runs it pretty poorly (also I bricked it somehow not run windows or any other usb install media, which is a big problem), the laptop runs windows 7 (it literally refuses to open the update utility I downloaded from MS’s website, so that’s that, two obsolete machines, that are absolutely horrendous to do anything with (not to mention my shitty 350$ phone is more powerful than both of them combined)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

why no 12 GBS of RAM? IDK

Because computing architecture is based around powers of 2, and having memory that follows that pattern is more efficient.

What I think you guys all mean with 8 GBs of RAM is the bare minimum for nowadays standard is if you use it for IT related topics or you like to hoard stuff in it (which ain’t bad, unused RAM is wasted RAM after all) or simply depend on heavy programs which ain’t the web browser,

I would disagree. Even casual usage these days is much more demanding than it once was. Try having Chrome, Spotify, and Discord open all at once. You’re going to start pushing that 8 GB further than you’d imagine. Plus, look at the new apple silicon macbooks. They put 8 GB in as the baseline saying shit like “since we designed it to all work together, it’s more efficient”, and real world test have shown that to be complete nonsense.

4 GB is completely unacceptable for deskop/laptop usage and would be a miserable, if not nearly unusable experience.

16 GB right now is definitely the baseline any new machine should have. I have a MacBook Pro from 2015 that has 16 GB and it still feels reasonably comfortable to use.

I do agree with your central premise here that it’s absurd that we need so much. But it’s just what happens as hardware advances, software developers push the limits of what the hardware can handle. Either that, or they’re just lazy and don’t bother optimizing since they think the machine can handle it (looking at you Chrome devs, and anyone who uses Electron).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because computing architecture is based around powers of 2, and having memory that follows that pattern is more efficient.

But what about Android phones? I see there are not many issues on that side with that amount.

Try having Chrome, Spotify, and Discord open all at once. You’re going to start pushing that 8 GB further than you’d imagine.

Yeah, I see a pattern here, all of that is Chrome lol.

My former work PC (which I mentioned before) that had 4 GBs of RAM required to be running always Windows 11 with Chrome, Microsoft Dynamics, Outlook, Microsoft Word, Excel, Sumatra PDF and some other few apps, so yeah I agree it was miserable, but I remember I could have Spotify as well, and AFAIK there are still Chromebooks shipped with 4 GBs of RAM? Granted they are more alike to a phone than a PC.

(looking at you Chrome devs, and anyone who uses Electron).

Definitely, my girlfriend uses a lot Notion on my Mac, and while the RAM isn’t an issue there we can see the fans spinning non stop when it is in use lol, I told her to open it on a Firefox tab and it was much much quieter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My Win10 PC with just my default apps open, which is mainly Firefox, Steam, a few other Launchers, Obsidian and Messaging clients - 8GB definitly doesn’t cut it today anymore. Running a newer game smashes the 16GB border easily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

why no 12 GBS of RAM?

Because there were no 6 or 12 GB modules. But that changes with DDR5

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

8GB was the bare minimum in 2010. It’s amazing how the increase of memory just stopped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Didn’t memory get heaps expensive for a while there?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I seem to remember that, for a couple years after DDR4 became the standard, it was significantly more expensive than DDR3.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s the thing. WHY should it need that? What is the OS doing that could possibly justify that level of memory use?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
  • The browser
  • Electron apps
  • Prefetching
  • AI shit/telemetry

Other than a browser, I had none of these on my Linux machine and I could comfortably run on 4GB of RAM

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 78K

    Comments