What does “insurrection” even mean?
That’s the question top Republican lawmakers — including Mitch McConnell, who previously held Donald Trump responsible for the riot on January 6, 2021 — are asking the Supreme Court in a brief defending him from being disqualified in the 2024 election.
In a legal brief filed Thursday, 179 Republican politicians urged the court to overturn a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that kicked Trump off the 2024 ballot because it found he violated the 14th Amendment’s Section 3, which bans those who “engaged in” insurrection from running.
Both Trump and Biden partisans could try to disqualify each other under Section 3, in tit-for-tat retaliation that has already been threatened," the Republicans wrote.
They forgot to add “by us” at the end of that sentence.
It’s bad enough when Neoliberals make these slippery slope fallacies when it comes to holding fascists accountable, but Republicans‽
Didn’t McConnell himself say it was a “violent insurrection”? So he could probably define it.
We all were here. We saw what happened. It was a violent insurrection for the purpose of trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power after a legitimately certified election, from one administration to the next. That’s what it was
This is the best summary I could come up with:
That’s the question top Republican lawmakers — including Mitch McConnell, who previously held Donald Trump responsible for the riot on January 6, 2021 — are asking the Supreme Court in a brief defending him from being disqualified in the 2024 election.
Trump appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, which agreed to take up the pivotal case in the coming weeks.
In their legal brief, the lawmakers argued Congress should enforce the 14th Amendment and that loose definitions of “insurrection” would allow “widespread abuse of Section 3 against political opponents.”
“Both Trump and Biden partisans could try to disqualify each other under Section 3, in tit-for-tat retaliation that has already been threatened,” the Republicans wrote.
“But once ‘engage in’ is defined so broadly, even significant countervailing evidence can simply be labeled as a ruse, as insufficient, or even as an implied recognition and praise of ongoing violence.”
A recent report by ABC News cited sources that claim Trump himself was reluctant to post the message and that one of his aides had to do it instead.
The original article contains 391 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Jan 6 was a big nothing burger. Filling a room with people is all it takes to take over a country these days??
They don’t want the supporters going after them.
I don’t get it. Why does McConnell not simply retreat into his shell at the first sign of danger?
He does. The GOP just had a special aide who will coax him out of there with slices of pizza. Each time he defends trump, he’ll get a whole pizza just for himself. Can’t blame the guy really. What else is he going to do when all his friends leave him to go play ninja with that stupid bearded rat?
