186 points

Trump is clearly a moron with some kind of clinical brain dysfunction, but this is just like 2 seconds of fumbling with words, which pretty much anyone who does public speaking can do. I was expecting more than like 2 second’s worth based on how big a deal the story sounded like.

IDK, maybe Newsweek is trying to run cover for him by running a big non-story about something innocuous to distract from the Nikki Haley / Nancy Pelosi thing.

permalink
report
reply
36 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I really don’t understand Newsweek.

Right, it’s one or two words he fumbles. His cognitive decline has been observed since 2016, nothing new here.

The article first says the video “is stoking concern among social media users” which, if you ask me, is not something news worthy. But then it goes on to point out how this was re-posted by the Biden campaign. Which does seems a little more of interest than just a bunch of yahoos on twitter pointing fingers.

Newsweek seems to always have a bullshit story above the fold and something somewhat relevant below it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This clip is pretty much on par with everything that tumbles out of his mouth. “Until you’re vetted and everything else” is what I heard. I’m so sick of non-stories about Trump when there are so so so many credible things to attack him for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I found your comment by searching for “Until you’re vetted”. It was easy enough to understand what he was saying that I was able to just search for the words I heard and find them here.

It’s easy to hear what he’s saying, sure he’s “slurring the words”, but it’s not like a drunk slurring the words, or like he’s had a stroke. He’s just speaking in a sloppy way, not enunciating his words. There’s a clear difference from earlier speeches where the words he was speaking were gibberish, but his enunciation was better. But, so what? What does that prove?

The Nikky Haley thing was a bigger gaffe, and more likely to indicate his not thinking correctly. But, again, it’s just a gaffe. Biden also made plenty of gaffes, even when he was much younger.

None of this matters though. What matters is what will happen if Trump becomes president again. His first term resulted in all kinds of damage, and that’s despite the fact that he didn’t really have the Republican establishment behind him, and that so many of his staff were inexperienced. This time the main reason he’s running is to be able to pardon himself from various crimes. He’s going to have the new republican party behind him pushing extreme ideas, and he’s going to be out for vengeance for all his enemies.

I really hope that going after him for “slurring his words” isn’t actually an effective strategy for the Biden team, because if it’s the kind of thing that actually sways votes, it shows how bad things really are in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The Nikki/Pelosi thing is more than a gaffe. It’s not like he said one name when he meant the other, a mixup anyone can make. No, he actually confused the people the way a person with Alzheimer’s does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
6 points

I KNEW IT

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Your take seems the most plausible to me, especially considering the clip they link to is super super short and removes any context.

I immediately wondered why this was a story given that clip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The last time Newsweek reported on him 🙄

You have a twice-impeached president but focus on this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah. I’m becoming more and more convinced that Newsweek is blowing up non-stories about Trump to dilute genuine criticism of him by creating a “stupid criticism of Trump that has no merit” bucket in people’s minds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

For-profit media doing whatever is most profitable, which is clickbait and gossip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Could assume their viewership only reads headlines and conservatives ignore it anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean they are both old as hell. I actually have been really pleased and surprised with what Biden’s done but he’s definitely old, and he doesn’t have Trump’s animating meanness energy to keep him sustained.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You aren’t wrong about any of this, but let’s not forget that a split second “BYAAAAAH” (Howard Dean) can tank an entire presidential run if it gets media attention.

With that said, Trump has had dozens of these blunders over the years. It means nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points

It would be hilarious if Trump just keeled over. Not only would his fans go nuts with insane theories but it would save the country a lot of trouble.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

Arguably, it’s the best thing that could happen for this country right now, that’s also in the realm of possibility. Like, a meteor conveniently taking out the more corrupt half of the supreme Court would obviously be better, but not realistic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I keep thinking someone might assassinate him. But that makes him some kind of martyr, which is bad. But then I wonder who would be the next demagogue and how would they use that to their advantage?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think his martyrdom is a small price to pay for his lack of existence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A certain archduke comes to mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No, not right now. September or October would be better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Agreed. Make him a martyr now and someone will take the mantle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I get a little bit excited every time there’s a Breaking News alert on my phone. Unfortunately the definition of breaking news is now such that it basically means someone retweeted something stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

GAME OVER: [Person with center-left politics/retired GOP politician with no skin in the game] TOTALLY HUMILIATES [Trump/MTG/any GOP demagogue] with argument

…it’s a just a tweet into the void that nobody with any stake in said argument will ever read

Thanks, HuffPost, MSNBC, et al, for basically all being MeidasTouch

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

all the “[person] slammed by [person]” headlines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You know they will wait for 3 days outside Maralago for the third cumming of christ.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And then Jesus came…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

All those Big Macs and KFC Big Crunch’s have to come back to haunt him eventually. Dude can’t be the only person on Earth immune to cholesterol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Honestly, I think him keeling over before the primaries are finished will harm the country. One of his opponents could run basically unopposed, and they’re all pretty shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And the moderate conservatives that are sitting it out because trump will gladly show up and check the ® box for pretty much anyone else. Don’t know why it’s so tough to get people to show up and vote on the democratic side, the conservatives will show up and vote for roadkill.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Part of dagma and zealotry is undying faith in the cause despite everything in the face of it. Democrats merely act in self interests and with basic minimum empathy, we have no allegiance to anybody and we do not idolize our politicians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Trump kneeling over and dying would be arguably the worse outcome. We all saw what happened when Dear Leader took a L, with the culmination being January 6.

In Trump land, unless Dear Leader dies in a golden light and ascends to heaven. The autopsy could be conducted live with the most unbiased person and it still wouldn’t matter. There will be massive conspiracy theories about the “Biden Crime Family”/Deep state/Hunter Biden’s laptop etc. assassinated Trump and that revenge needs to be taken.

Trump needs to be made irrelevant first. No one is going to storm a building over someone who is irrelevant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points
*

In 2013, IBT Media acquired Newsweek from IAC; the acquisition included the Newsweek brand and its online publication, but did not include The Daily Beast.[11] IBT Media, which also owns the International Business Times, rebranded itself as Newsweek Media Group, and in 2014, relaunched Newsweek in both print and digital form.

In 2018, IBT Media split into two companies, Newsweek Publishing and IBT Media. The split was accomplished one day before the District Attorney of Manhattan indicted Etienne Uzac, the co-owner of IBT Media, on fraud charges.[12][13][14]

IBT Media is an American global digital news organization with over 90 million monthly readers, owned by followers of religious leader David Jang.[1][2]

Long story short, one of the more savvy outlets of the Evangelical right.

edit for formatting

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Does that mean they’re turning on Trump? Because this sure isn’t a positive story about him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

They tend to try to seem centrist. They’re savvy about it, so they’re not necessarily interested in being caught out at being a straight-up, purist, propaganda rag.

That said, I’m not sure if they support Trump or not. Not all evangelicals do, since he’s not very Jesus-like. I’ve been trying to remind people of that myself recently, despite not personally being a very religious person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

From what I see of the Evangelicals from the outside, their relation to Jesus seems to be fairly tenuous at best.

The maze of US Christian sects is fairly confusing when seen from abroad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Sounds like Aphasia, maybe the 2 brain cells collided and caused a stroke.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphasia

But I’m not an expert, it would have been nice to have the rest of the speech.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Trump’s picture has been my mnemonic for dysarthria which is a bit more of a precise term for what we’re talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

There’s also the possibility of tertiary syphilis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Personally, I hope it’s a carnivorous brain worm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

deleted by creator

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have no idea what that is but it implies primary and secondary syphilis…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

That might be more plausible, I’ve just seen Aphasia a few times, dysarthria is new to me, but it fits better with an earlier incident, where they claimed it was dry mouth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

If racial slurs did tank his candidacy, regular old slurring probably won’t.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments