There is an illustrated flowchart for various pathways to legal immigration in the U.S.

43 points

short answer: by design

permalink
report
reply
37 points

This doesn’t appear to even touch on the topic of cost for the process. The fees on paper may only be a couple hundred dollars, but if you want any chance of actually getting through the process correctly without missing paperwork or deadlines resulting in a denial from the bureaucratic machine, you’ll essentially need an immigration attorney, and they are not cheap.

When my dad married a woman from the Phillipines about 9 years ago, it ended up costing around $20k for her and one child. That process took almost 5 years to complete… and this was after they’d already been in the US via a Visa and decided to get married here. So ostensibly a bunch of relevant requirements had to have been already verified with the previously approved Visa.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

That’s worse than my story, sorry they had to go through that.

I married my wife while I was living in her country, Georgia. Then I came back to the U.S. and started the process for her to come. It took 17 months. I didn’t need a lawyer for it. We did later try to get a visitor visa for my mother-in-law and it got denied. I always say that if I had it to do over again, it would have probably been cheaper and quicker to fly them both to Mexico and then cross the border.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

See also, “why does the tax system work for wealthy businesses but not for people with $1000 in Etsy sales or people who wanted their child tax credits”

Businesses can somehow always find all the immigrants labor they need, but the tired poor yearning suckers have to wait outside and hope the cartels find someone else to pick on

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Obligatory fuck Cato.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

The take-home is that the US immigration procedure is so inhumane that even the fucking Cato institute thinks it’s a bit much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s what I was thinking. Cato is awful, and as the other person replying to you was saying how fucked is our immigration system that Cato, of all places, wrote an intelligent article that I mostly agree with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I got a headache at the flow chart.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 437K

    Comments