13 points

Sexual?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Website has too many ads, not clicking.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

and isn’t GDPR compliant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The best part is it was just copied from another site, at least it was cited. I sent to the site and it said the article is based on an article from another source.

Here’s the true source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06633-0.pdf

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How do you know if you didn’t click

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Because I’ve clicked on it many times before and it is wicked toxic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I see wired and my immidiate thought is, whatever the article is, it’s not worth it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

How tf you going to be on lemmy and not know to use Firefox with uBlock Origin?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

“How does it work?” - ICP

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Violent J in shambles rn

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

The headline is a straight up lie. As per the article itself, it was conceived of in 1966 and experimentally confirmed in 2020.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Not quite. If I understood correctly, Nagaoka predicted magnetism in a thin material with electron deficiency. This happened in a thin material with 50% excess of electrons, which arguably is different or at least something Nagaoka didn’t exactly predict.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I get what you’re saying, but you also wouldn’t say it was discovered in 1966 as it was simply theorized without any direct evidence. A lot of things are theorized before they are actually discovered to exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s what discovery is: realizing that something exists and describing it.

You’re talking about creating, using, verifying, observing, etc. There are lots of things Einstein discovered that we are still verifying. It doesn’t mean he didn’t “discover” general relativity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

“ Within scientific disciplines, discovery is the observation of new phenomena, actions, or events which help explain the knowledge gathered through previously acquired scientific evidence.”
Straight from wikipedia (page on discovery).
“ In science, the term “theory” refers to “a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.” Straight from wikipedia page on Theory.
So if something is theorised to exist, it is neither a theory or discovery. Both cases need evidence and this has only now been presented.
Within science, someone can not “realize” something exist and claim discovery.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren’t liked generally. I’ve posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don’t screen everything, lrn2scroll

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments