cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/13355449

Capitalism is a game where only a few people get to win.

We have also seen time and time again that it is a game that is able to manipulate and change whatever ideology or behaviour you have to work towards its own benefit.

So the only way to actually “win” is to not play the game.

Right now that seems impossible because it is a massive collective action problem, however this whole platform is a testament to show that it’s possible to overcome that kind of problem.

Reddit is a dominant platform that is starting to destroy itself. People are in turn finding alternatives such as Lemmy to satisfy the need that Reddit once did.

I view capitalism in the same way. It will never truly completely cease to exist (the same way Digg never truly died), but it can become irrelevant over time if we collectively decide to just use another system to satisfy the same needs that capitalism is satisfying today.

The one example that I can think of that tries to tackle this problem is the idea of free stores that are based on a gift economy. If more people decided to use this system instead of capitalism then capitalism will have less sway over people’s lives.

And in the end it doesn’t have to be specifically a free store that needs to be adopted by wider society but whatever it is does need to satisfy the same basic need that capitalism does in our current society.

25 points

So the only way to actually “win” is to not play the game.

Start an employee-owned socialist company and get to it! It’s been done before, somewhat successfully. So get on it!

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Sadly you often need a lot of capital, a resource available largely to the wealthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Details matter, but there are low capital businesses. Ice cream and pizza shops as examples.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Also, this is a website with a lot of tech professionals. You can get together a few fellow professionals and set up a coop. Law offices are kinda like that with partners being owners. You can follow the partner model which is very bougieoise or you can include even your cleaning staff as coowners. It’s not like starting a factory

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Isn’t the “company” part of what you mentioned still playing the game?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Capitalism isn’t “organizations involved in work” or even the idea of trading goods and services for others or currency.

Capitalism is the idea that there’s people who own the land, buildings, machines, and materials, hire labour, and pay them as little as they can convince them to work for while taking profit for just being the boss of that stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ok I agree with that definition, but the suggestion that you were making, at least how I interpreted it, was to start a socialist company to try and be successful within that same exploitative system which I think sort of misses the point of what I was trying to say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not all models or definitions of Capitalism even follow that, go read Henry George. You can represent collective ownership of land through taxing the shit out of those that own it, and since it’s the one resource you can’t make more of its the best way to eliminate the landlord parasite problem because no one will own land they don’t intend to use to fulfill a use case. Supply for housing, for example, would even out as landlords start seeing holding unimproved land as a huge red check on their balance sheets. They would be incentivized to sell or build something that people need on said land.

Trickle down economics was a joke because the more wealthy people become, the more they want with that wealth, and the more they’re desires influence what the market creates. So we spend resources making diamond studded hand bags and mega yachts when the market wouldn’t even create those things if the richest among us (always land owners in the end) actually got taxed on the one thing they can’t tax dodge, land holdings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The only way to move beyond capitalism is to find the source of free energy that will enable post-scarcity. Until then humans will continue to compete for resources.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Or move to circular economy and accept that GDP doesn’t measure prosperity. We already have free energy from the Sun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You know we have enough food for everyone. Scarcity is created and would be if we had free energy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We may technically have enough food for everyone, but we don’t have teleporters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We have boats and planes though, but besides that teleporting isn’t a factor when people are starving right next to a taco bell which is the point I was trying to make.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is a commonly held belief and one that I had for most of my life. I don’t know what finally did it for me, but the book Trekonomics definitely gave me a push.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We are already post scarcity. Most energy use is just a complete waste.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Most of our energy is used wastefully in the pursuit of infinite growth on a finite planet. We have enough energy to provide for every person. We do not have enough energy to provide for capital

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This.

This is why investment in fusion is so important. For one thing all energy markets will become null and void. But secondly, the point where we have no more energy scarcity is a point when we finally have replicators.

I can taste the raktakino now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
3 points

That is sort of my point. If you play the game you are going to lose (in this case get co-opted) so you need to be able to not play the same game that they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

free stores that are based on a gift economy.

How do those who gift the stores the free goods get those goods to gift?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Yeah it is through capitalism at the moment. My point is that it doesn’t have to be.

I was pointing out free stores as a model.

permalink
report
parent
reply

if I can’t win I’ll get a printer and ruin every economy possible

permalink
report
reply

General Discussion

!general@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don’t seem to fit in any other community, or don’t have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World

🧭 Finding Communities

Feel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:

Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.
  1. See: Rules for Users.
  2. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  3. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  4. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  5. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  6. Posts concerning other instances’ activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  7. No Ads/Spamming.
  8. No NSFW content.

Community stats

  • 872

    Monthly active users

  • 563

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments