Tankie’s original use was for British communists who supported Soviet military expansion. In the modern sense, it is used to describe communists who are authoritarian-apologists. For example, a communist who romanticizes the Soviet Union or makes excuses for the Uyghur genocide is a tankie. I’ve also seen it stretched to include militant anti-capitalists, or more commonly, “militant,” anti-capitalists who call for violent resistance to capitalism from the safety of a keyboard.
Democratic-Socialists are not tankies. Socialists are not tankies. I don’t even think most communists qualify as tankies. Criticizing Democrats does not make you a tankie. Condemning Israel’s human rights violations does not make you a tankie. Voting third party doesn’t make you a tankie. I see this term used here every day, but never correctly.
Fat chance. Liberals’ understanding of a term only extends to how useful it is to their political agenda (maintaining the status quo).
It’s the same reason they mindlessly equate the term “radical” with extremism (usually the right-wing kind).
I was called a tankie 2 days ago. I’m an anarchist who occasionally is known to get gets into flame wars with the tankies…
There is a simple rule to seperate tankies from the left;
if they call for nuking an entire hemisphere of the planet or openly call for genocide, that’s a tankie.
I’m sorry sir have you considered going back to China and/or Russia?
True, however equally true
