Apple has decided to remove Progressive web apps from iOS in EU. If you have a business in the EU or serve EU users via Web App/PWA, we must hear from you in the next 48 hours!

37 points

Didn’t Firefox kill PWA support too.

What was Mozilla’s reason behind this?

permalink
report
reply
49 points

Only on the desktop. PWAs still exist on the mobile version of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Thank you. Wasn’t sure about mobile myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do they? I haven’t been able to figure it how to save a shortcut for a PWA, so all the PWAs on my phone use Chrome :/

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Tap the three dots on bottom left, install.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Reasons were basically too much maintenance for little benefit on the desktop they could see

Meanwhile, they remove GTK and Qt theming from Thunderbird

(n.b.: I actually agree that PWAs have little more benefit on the desktop than a bookmark, but still)

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
44 points

Money. They don’t get a cut of a pwa app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I don’t understand the question. Mozilla, or Firefox rather supports pwa on android, they dropped it from desktop Firefox for reasons that aren’t clear to me. I’m not sure how it would play out on iOS. I guess we’ll find out here soon enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Nothing is wrong with PWA. This is nothing but petty backlash from Apple for the EU trying to force them to allow competition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
4 points

Yeah, good luck with that mate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

I have literally never used a web app from the 3gs to this day. No idea why people think this is such a huge deal?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

The lemmy app Voyager for iOS, one of the most popular as it behaves like Apollo from Reddit, is a PWA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There is a native app for voyager though which is also pretty dope. Can recommend, am using it to type this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Interesting. Personally I’ve been using Mlem with great success on iOS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The big deal is this was the only way you could bypass Apple’s app store tax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Because for 90% of the time, you couldn’t. It was only implemented in iOS 16 or 17 I believe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m using Android but I can give you a few personal examples on why I still prefer mobile websites to apps.

  1. The place where I take weather has a shitty app full of ads and always sending notifications. They don’t have PWA offered on their site but just going through a browser instead of the app is significantly better.

  2. YouTube’s app is also full of ads. So I use the mobile website in Firefox with uBlock Origin.

  3. Again with awful apps full of ads. Twitter is also much more tolerable through the mobile website. There’s no autoplay on FF and again, ads blocked.

  4. I still use IRC and my client is web based, so that I can see pictures and videos in my chats. The web based IRC client (The Lounge) offers PWA and it’s very nice to have the thing in a “clean” browser.

Again, I don’t use Apple for reasons like this, but Firefox is already pretty bad with PWA and having those possibilities mangled or removed wouldn’t be acceptable to me.

Maybe you don’t use a browser on mobile and just do everything through terrible apps. Maybe most people do the same. But if you don’t use it, why do you care if those using it want to retain the possibility to do so?

I personally don’t watch TV so nobody watches TV anymore, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For YouTube, I’ve found NewPipe (and probably others) offers a much better experience than YouTube in the web.

The real reason I want PWAs to be a thing is because I don’t want to always use iOS and Android, and PWAs allow me to use an alternative. I really want to use a Linux phone like Pinephone, and PWAs will be a big part of that transition. PWAs are the only truly cross-platform development option, so they offer value to web devs as well as users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Interesting. I do visit a few websites regularly but I guess I’ve always just kept the tabs open in Safari and called it a day. (And Safari just stays in permanent Privacy mode so that as much tracking data is flushed as possible each time I close a tab.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

They’re removing pwa from the desktop, not stopping them from functioning entirely.

You can still have a cobbled together insecure piece of trash but you gotta go to its url in the browser instead of clicking the app.

Hell, you can still have a shortcut to it on the desktop.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

insecure piece of trash

Websites are more tightly sandboxed and more secure than native apps.

you gotta go to its url in the browser instead of clicking the app.

PWAs are more than just an app icon. “PWA” also means usage of particular APIs such as allowing the web app to work offline.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not gonna get into a back and forth over pwa security. It’s worth noting that offline pwa hasn’t worked on iOS for at least a year and two major versions of the os.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

PWAs has a bunch of other features too. Either way apple should fix the offline part instead of being assholes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How is it more insecure than a website?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@kilgore_trout @bloodfart apple wants people to jump through THEIR hoops to run anything on their phone, so they can get a 30% cut of the money. That’s why they’re so rich. PWAs bypass that. Apple would kill off web browsers too if they had the power - just like they did kill off Flash, which made the web too powerful for Apple at the time, giving not enough incentive to install their walled garden apps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

How is a piece of software that runs in the browser instead of directly in the os, uses a million little libraries and became popular as a way to avoid scrutiny on the distribution platform less secure than a website?

Let’s assume you have great answers for all that and I’m made to look like a fool: when someone goes to a website, their guard is up. When they click on an app their guard is down.

If nothing else pwas bypass user distrust of weird crap on the internet and that’s a bad thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

@bloodfart @kilgore_trout
“when someone goes to a website, their guard is up. When they click on an app their guard is down.”

???

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

@bloodfart @kilgore_trout
“How is a piece of software that runs in the browser instead of directly in the os… less secure than a website?”

The question answered itself 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 880

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments

Community moderators