Biden administration calls for developers to embrace memory-safe programing languages and move away from those that cause buffer overflows and other memory access vulnerabilities.
Skill issue
I think that’s the point. You can’t trust the average developer to do things safely. And remember, half of all programmers are even worse than average.
The word “average“ can mean many things, for example, mean, median, mode, or even things like “within 1 standard deviation from the mean”.
I was using it strictly as the mean which divides the population exactly in half.
Bell curves don’t work to make this point. A bell curve is symmetrical, so half of developers will always be below average on a bell curve. But yes, it is true that for other types of distributions, more or less than half of the developers could be below average. What the person above you was looking for, in the general case, would be the median.
What? How would you define “average”? His statement is technically correct.
Guys, C++ is gonna be dead in a couple of years now. Remember this comment…
…and read it again in ten years.
Biden administration has fallen into the Rewrite it in Rust agenda.
Pretty crazy to reccomend Java as a secure alternative.
Java’s runtime has had a large number of CVEs in the last few years, so that’s probably a decent reason to be concerned.
Nothing really, the JVM has a pretty troubled history that would really make me hesitate to call it “safe”. It was originally built before anyone gave much thought to security and that fact plauges it to the present day.
As you wish. Time to start learning D and D++
