95 points

Using Steve Harvey for this is an interesting choice…

permalink
report
reply
8 points

It’s just a meme

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Not if you’re familiar with him

Example

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

It’s an interesting choice because Steve is a right-wing nutjob himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I think that is the punchline, isn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean, of all the things you could pull out about Steve Harvey, this is about the tamest.

This reads like a manager who’s stressing out about being too busy at work, and his therapist told him to write a letter and not hit send, and then he hit send.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Steve Harvey, a wealthy person who wants for nothing steps all over other people’s feelings? How unexpected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

Use this moment. Keep leading them on, and then when the moment is right say “that’s why I’m an anarchist”

permalink
report
reply
40 points

And they hit back with, “I’m a sovereign citizen too!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

💀

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

“Anarcho-capitalist, right?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

“That depends, is capitalism still intrinsically hierarchical?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

legit question not for any argumentative reason but also when/if you respond I may also have a response that pushes back. No harm tho.

When it comes to being an anarchist what do you actually imagine the end game being? I also agree the powers that be are shit. But anarchy in my mind will lead to small collectives of people like feudal socialism or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Anarchists are rarely the “no government” people the media portrays them as. Generally it’s an understanding that hierarchy is inharently bad, though still sometimes required. From there it can go any number of directions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I appreciate you want to understand. For a bit more research for yourself, I’m actually an anarcho-syndicalist. I’m also pretty unique even within that ideology, fwiw. What I imagine is a socialist library economy, in which the librarians are elected and the library is the primary method of distributing goods. The librarians are also responsible for managing and automating work and food production. I imagine a solarpunk society where communities are mostly self sustaining but also interdependent. I imagine a world that has no need for money.

I also imagine that unions represent both their communities and the workers within the community and that all managers within workplaces are elected. When the many various dealings happen between communities, I imagine something similar to haudenosaunee council meetings. Each community sends a proportional bargaining committee of their population, and the largest communities must reach consensus between and with each other before being decided on by and between consensus from the smaller communities. Tentative agreements must then be voted and ratified through simple majority by all communities to be considered participants in the contracts. I’m sure people will say “that’s too slow”. To that I say, you’ve never seen how quick a union can turn around an emergency meeting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Come join us at slrpnk.net, you’ll find like-minded people there interested in prefiguring such systems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Very interesting, thank you for the write-up! Out of curiosity, how does a moneyless society work?

Just I do you solids, you do me solids? How does a moneyless society allow trade if one party doesn’t have any goods the other party wants?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Remove your hand from my shoulder before I remove it from your wrist.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

“⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️” five star meme

—Peter Travers <Rolling Stone>

permalink
report
reply
0 points

This happened in Germany in the early forties…

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

Not really. It was more that conservatives thought they could controll the far right and made appeasement their main doctrine.

The left (that was a lot more left than nowadays) was always against the Nazis.

Edit: and that was in the mid 30s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I might be too ignorant to put this in the proper context, but what do you make of the so-called Beefsteak Nazis (i.e. leftists who joined the Nazis)? Not to say the Nazis were in any way authentically leftist, but they did use leftist rhetoric (see Strasserism) to get left-wing, working class support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

First time I hear that term, it is not used in German. Yeah, there was a minority wing in the NSDAP who had some socialists views. The NSDAP was not a monolithic group, unlike many might believe. They also had a lot of esoteric people. Edit: all of them were fascists though, not communists nor liberals.

But they are not the ones who brought Hitler to power. That was Paul von Hindenburg, Franz von Papen, a group of industrialists (Industrielleneingabe) and, of course, the people, that voted for him.

It is all pretty well documented.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.1K

    Posts

  • 138K

    Comments