56 points

Wouldn’t that imply that the federal government needs to do something to prevent similar events in the future? Like actually doing something to reduce CO2 emissions in the US?

permalink
report
reply
28 points

It would activate the FEMA fund and allow for a pool of executive spending for disaster relief, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Oh you mean, oh no, big oil and legacy auto are struggling with the switch to EV… they need relief money so they can destroy the ecosystem and come up with a 0 emission plan by 2050…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, I mean that our dear president and his cabinet get to decide to continue with BP’s BS and lose 2024, or prove that he’s tackling climate change earnestly and with all due seriousness over the next 5 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

"Oh, haha, now that I am personally getting inconvenienced by climate change, I demand the government take action to assist me."

You know, we could have worked to prevent this all together decades ago for everyone when we were told this would happen over and over. Man we’re a shitty species. Maybe the heat will teach some of those who need it some much needed humility.

Nah.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

More than a century ago in fact;

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I usually don’t like this type of stuff, but this made me laugh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=wCo3XwTRg9o

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

It’s been over 100°F for two or three weeks here. Of course I live in a redhat reichwing state and people are quick to point out “yeah, it’s always 104° in July” the problem is its been over 100° every day since June. That’s unusual. Or it was unusual.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

This article didn’t even mention deadly wet bulb conditions (ie, humidity so high that sweating no longer cools a person down).

We’ll be hearing more and more about that as climate change progresses. Talk about a disaster… combine that with a power failure, and you’ll start seeing a true catastrophe.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

It was 95F and 98% humidity at my house the other day. I thought I was going to die every time my dogs had to go out to pee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This prompted me to look up how humidity percentages work. It’s the amount of water in the air relative to it’s current maximum based on temperature and pressure. Going above 100% is possible above 25000 ft due to the purity of the air. Clouds formed when impurities are introduced or pressure and temperature allow. (This is all just my cursory pleb ‘knowledge’ and may be partially or entirely wrong)

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

How about we compromise and just declare the oil industry itself a federal disaster and nationalize it?

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments