98 points

They dont. It just happens that natural selection favored flowers that looked vaguely bird like and over time, flowers that looked more and more like a bird outcompeted the ones that looked less like one.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

What’s funny is how absurd this is. Most flowers don’t look like birds and they’re fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

This has nothing to do with natural selection. It’s just a coincidence that the buds very shortly and from a specific angle vaguely look like birds.

Most of the images shared are probably photoshopped to enhance the effect too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

looks at user name

Sounds like something a BIRD would say!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think photoshop is needed to find the right flowers and photograph at the right angle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wow you’re right.

It’s more like “look at this blossom that looks a bit like a bird” rather than “look at this type of tree that makes bird-like blossoms”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It’s about tiny percents.

A bird will land on a flower.

A bird will not land on a bird.

So every one in a million time a bird mistakes a flower for a bird, that’s a flower that survives.

All you have to do is wait a couple million years for the odds to turn in the bird flower’s favor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

…But birds pollinate flowers. How is a bird not landing on this (particular, too) flower going to help it survive?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Right, but what about the mimic plant? It mimicks whatever plant is near it. And it can mimic plastic plants. https://www.vox.com/down-to-earth/2022/11/30/23473062/plant-mimicry-boquila-trifoliolata

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Should be a pretty trivial experiment to replicate

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

“Appear to look like”…

I wonder what they look like if you manage to ignore the appearances.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

My guess would be Yulan magnolia blossoms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Animals are something plants invented to help spread their seeds around.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Know what’s wild? For millions of years nothing around ate trees, so when a tree grew and died and fell it was permanently there because there was no rot. Which is how we got petrified forests.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

From my readings, I don’t think this is the case. Lignin degradation evolved rapidly with terrestrial plants. Coal and petrified wood is more due to geological events and swamps for example. Evolving ligninases is trivial for bacteria and fungi.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Isn’t that more because of the lack of fungi that could break down wood?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Life in general is most likely something the universe invented to speed up entropy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Life is a natural part of entropy for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

There’s a nice theory about how it looks like the goal is actually to produce photons more efficiently.

Edit: my source is French astrophysicists and science popularizer David Elbaz https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:53012702

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

#BirdsArentReal

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Please tell me there is a lemmy community for this

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

birdsarentreal@lemmy.world exists

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

subbed!

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

“…how birds look like…”

Just one of many issues with the English here.

  • what it looks like
  • how it looks

You need to pick a lane.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I typically assume it’s a non-native speaker with things like this, but I’m not sure in this case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I too try to give the benefit of the doubt when reading stilted text that basically conveys the meaning but the syntax is janky.

I’m in southern Ohio so there are quite a few people from the hills and hollers around here.

Methany definitely talks exactly like how that is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I’d read this with commas around ‘like’, rather than with a period after it: “… how birds look, like, I’m afraid” works as a sentence while “… how birds look like. I’m afraid” is both wrong, like you point out, but also sounds much more serious than the jokey tone I’d expect from a message without punctuation and capitalization

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We will never know what the tweet author intended lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Did you understand what was being communicated? Yes? Congratulations!

Because, really, that’s generally all that’s necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
 MY PARSER BROKE
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Multi-track drifting

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

No they’re asking how do birds look like the way they do. In which case the answer is that a bird’s body evolved to be streamlined and lightweight in order to fly more efficiently. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

No one cares mate.

It’s fine to correct the grammar of children in your care, but not really in other circumstances.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 84K

    Comments